Cargando…

Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Standard treatments are not available for hilar nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma (NCC). It is unknown whether combination therapy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) plus systemic chemotherapy is superior to PDT alone. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 68 patients with hilar NCC treate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wentrup, Robert, Winkelmann, Nicola, Mitroshkin, Andrey, Prager, Matthias, Voderholzer, Winfried, Schachschal, Guido, Jürgensen, Christian, Büning, Carsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4849702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26814610
http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl15175
_version_ 1782429582265155584
author Wentrup, Robert
Winkelmann, Nicola
Mitroshkin, Andrey
Prager, Matthias
Voderholzer, Winfried
Schachschal, Guido
Jürgensen, Christian
Büning, Carsten
author_facet Wentrup, Robert
Winkelmann, Nicola
Mitroshkin, Andrey
Prager, Matthias
Voderholzer, Winfried
Schachschal, Guido
Jürgensen, Christian
Büning, Carsten
author_sort Wentrup, Robert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Standard treatments are not available for hilar nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma (NCC). It is unknown whether combination therapy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) plus systemic chemotherapy is superior to PDT alone. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 68 patients with hilar NCC treated with either PDT plus chemotherapy (PTD-C) or PDT monotherapy (PDT-M). The primary endpoint was the mean overall survival rate. Secondary endpoints included the 1-year survival rate, risk of cholangitic complications, and outcomes, which were evaluated according to the chemotherapy protocol. RESULTS: More than 90% of the study population had advanced hilar NCC Bismuth type III or IV. In the PDT-M group (n=35), the mean survival time was 374 days compared with 520 days in the PDT-C group (n=33, p=0.021). The 1-year survival rate was significantly higher in the PDT-C group compared with the PDT-M group (88% vs 58%, p=0.001) with a significant reduction of mortality (hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.07 to 0.58; p=0.003). Gemcitabine monotherapy resulted in a shorter survival time compared with the gemcitabine combination therapy (mean, 395 days vs 566 days; p=0.09). Cholangitic complications were observed at a similar frequency in the PDT-C and PDT-M groups. CONCLUSIONS: Combining repeated PDT with a gemcitabine-based combination therapy might offer a significant survival benefit in patients with hilar NCC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4849702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Editorial Office of Gut and Liver
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48497022016-05-04 Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma Wentrup, Robert Winkelmann, Nicola Mitroshkin, Andrey Prager, Matthias Voderholzer, Winfried Schachschal, Guido Jürgensen, Christian Büning, Carsten Gut Liver Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Standard treatments are not available for hilar nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma (NCC). It is unknown whether combination therapy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) plus systemic chemotherapy is superior to PDT alone. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 68 patients with hilar NCC treated with either PDT plus chemotherapy (PTD-C) or PDT monotherapy (PDT-M). The primary endpoint was the mean overall survival rate. Secondary endpoints included the 1-year survival rate, risk of cholangitic complications, and outcomes, which were evaluated according to the chemotherapy protocol. RESULTS: More than 90% of the study population had advanced hilar NCC Bismuth type III or IV. In the PDT-M group (n=35), the mean survival time was 374 days compared with 520 days in the PDT-C group (n=33, p=0.021). The 1-year survival rate was significantly higher in the PDT-C group compared with the PDT-M group (88% vs 58%, p=0.001) with a significant reduction of mortality (hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.07 to 0.58; p=0.003). Gemcitabine monotherapy resulted in a shorter survival time compared with the gemcitabine combination therapy (mean, 395 days vs 566 days; p=0.09). Cholangitic complications were observed at a similar frequency in the PDT-C and PDT-M groups. CONCLUSIONS: Combining repeated PDT with a gemcitabine-based combination therapy might offer a significant survival benefit in patients with hilar NCC. Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 2016-05 2016-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4849702/ /pubmed/26814610 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl15175 Text en Copyright © 2016 by The Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Korean Association the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wentrup, Robert
Winkelmann, Nicola
Mitroshkin, Andrey
Prager, Matthias
Voderholzer, Winfried
Schachschal, Guido
Jürgensen, Christian
Büning, Carsten
Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma
title Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma
title_full Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma
title_fullStr Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma
title_short Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma
title_sort photodynamic therapy plus chemotherapy compared with photodynamic therapy alone in hilar nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4849702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26814610
http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl15175
work_keys_str_mv AT wentruprobert photodynamictherapypluschemotherapycomparedwithphotodynamictherapyaloneinhilarnonresectablecholangiocarcinoma
AT winkelmannnicola photodynamictherapypluschemotherapycomparedwithphotodynamictherapyaloneinhilarnonresectablecholangiocarcinoma
AT mitroshkinandrey photodynamictherapypluschemotherapycomparedwithphotodynamictherapyaloneinhilarnonresectablecholangiocarcinoma
AT pragermatthias photodynamictherapypluschemotherapycomparedwithphotodynamictherapyaloneinhilarnonresectablecholangiocarcinoma
AT voderholzerwinfried photodynamictherapypluschemotherapycomparedwithphotodynamictherapyaloneinhilarnonresectablecholangiocarcinoma
AT schachschalguido photodynamictherapypluschemotherapycomparedwithphotodynamictherapyaloneinhilarnonresectablecholangiocarcinoma
AT jurgensenchristian photodynamictherapypluschemotherapycomparedwithphotodynamictherapyaloneinhilarnonresectablecholangiocarcinoma
AT buningcarsten photodynamictherapypluschemotherapycomparedwithphotodynamictherapyaloneinhilarnonresectablecholangiocarcinoma