Cargando…
Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Standard treatments are not available for hilar nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma (NCC). It is unknown whether combination therapy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) plus systemic chemotherapy is superior to PDT alone. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 68 patients with hilar NCC treate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Editorial Office of Gut and Liver
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4849702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26814610 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl15175 |
_version_ | 1782429582265155584 |
---|---|
author | Wentrup, Robert Winkelmann, Nicola Mitroshkin, Andrey Prager, Matthias Voderholzer, Winfried Schachschal, Guido Jürgensen, Christian Büning, Carsten |
author_facet | Wentrup, Robert Winkelmann, Nicola Mitroshkin, Andrey Prager, Matthias Voderholzer, Winfried Schachschal, Guido Jürgensen, Christian Büning, Carsten |
author_sort | Wentrup, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Standard treatments are not available for hilar nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma (NCC). It is unknown whether combination therapy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) plus systemic chemotherapy is superior to PDT alone. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 68 patients with hilar NCC treated with either PDT plus chemotherapy (PTD-C) or PDT monotherapy (PDT-M). The primary endpoint was the mean overall survival rate. Secondary endpoints included the 1-year survival rate, risk of cholangitic complications, and outcomes, which were evaluated according to the chemotherapy protocol. RESULTS: More than 90% of the study population had advanced hilar NCC Bismuth type III or IV. In the PDT-M group (n=35), the mean survival time was 374 days compared with 520 days in the PDT-C group (n=33, p=0.021). The 1-year survival rate was significantly higher in the PDT-C group compared with the PDT-M group (88% vs 58%, p=0.001) with a significant reduction of mortality (hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.07 to 0.58; p=0.003). Gemcitabine monotherapy resulted in a shorter survival time compared with the gemcitabine combination therapy (mean, 395 days vs 566 days; p=0.09). Cholangitic complications were observed at a similar frequency in the PDT-C and PDT-M groups. CONCLUSIONS: Combining repeated PDT with a gemcitabine-based combination therapy might offer a significant survival benefit in patients with hilar NCC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4849702 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Editorial Office of Gut and Liver |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48497022016-05-04 Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma Wentrup, Robert Winkelmann, Nicola Mitroshkin, Andrey Prager, Matthias Voderholzer, Winfried Schachschal, Guido Jürgensen, Christian Büning, Carsten Gut Liver Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Standard treatments are not available for hilar nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma (NCC). It is unknown whether combination therapy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) plus systemic chemotherapy is superior to PDT alone. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 68 patients with hilar NCC treated with either PDT plus chemotherapy (PTD-C) or PDT monotherapy (PDT-M). The primary endpoint was the mean overall survival rate. Secondary endpoints included the 1-year survival rate, risk of cholangitic complications, and outcomes, which were evaluated according to the chemotherapy protocol. RESULTS: More than 90% of the study population had advanced hilar NCC Bismuth type III or IV. In the PDT-M group (n=35), the mean survival time was 374 days compared with 520 days in the PDT-C group (n=33, p=0.021). The 1-year survival rate was significantly higher in the PDT-C group compared with the PDT-M group (88% vs 58%, p=0.001) with a significant reduction of mortality (hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.07 to 0.58; p=0.003). Gemcitabine monotherapy resulted in a shorter survival time compared with the gemcitabine combination therapy (mean, 395 days vs 566 days; p=0.09). Cholangitic complications were observed at a similar frequency in the PDT-C and PDT-M groups. CONCLUSIONS: Combining repeated PDT with a gemcitabine-based combination therapy might offer a significant survival benefit in patients with hilar NCC. Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 2016-05 2016-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4849702/ /pubmed/26814610 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl15175 Text en Copyright © 2016 by The Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Korean Association the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wentrup, Robert Winkelmann, Nicola Mitroshkin, Andrey Prager, Matthias Voderholzer, Winfried Schachschal, Guido Jürgensen, Christian Büning, Carsten Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma |
title | Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma |
title_full | Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma |
title_fullStr | Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma |
title_short | Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma |
title_sort | photodynamic therapy plus chemotherapy compared with photodynamic therapy alone in hilar nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4849702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26814610 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl15175 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wentruprobert photodynamictherapypluschemotherapycomparedwithphotodynamictherapyaloneinhilarnonresectablecholangiocarcinoma AT winkelmannnicola photodynamictherapypluschemotherapycomparedwithphotodynamictherapyaloneinhilarnonresectablecholangiocarcinoma AT mitroshkinandrey photodynamictherapypluschemotherapycomparedwithphotodynamictherapyaloneinhilarnonresectablecholangiocarcinoma AT pragermatthias photodynamictherapypluschemotherapycomparedwithphotodynamictherapyaloneinhilarnonresectablecholangiocarcinoma AT voderholzerwinfried photodynamictherapypluschemotherapycomparedwithphotodynamictherapyaloneinhilarnonresectablecholangiocarcinoma AT schachschalguido photodynamictherapypluschemotherapycomparedwithphotodynamictherapyaloneinhilarnonresectablecholangiocarcinoma AT jurgensenchristian photodynamictherapypluschemotherapycomparedwithphotodynamictherapyaloneinhilarnonresectablecholangiocarcinoma AT buningcarsten photodynamictherapypluschemotherapycomparedwithphotodynamictherapyaloneinhilarnonresectablecholangiocarcinoma |