Cargando…

The Role of Datasets on Scientific Influence within Conflict Research

We inductively tested if a coherent field of inquiry in human conflict research emerged in an analysis of published research involving “conflict” in the Web of Science (WoS) over a 66-year period (1945–2011). We created a citation network that linked the 62,504 WoS records and their cited literature...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Holt, Tracy, Johnson, Jeffery C., Moates, Shiloh, Carley, Kathleen M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4849708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27124569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154148
_version_ 1782429583607332864
author Van Holt, Tracy
Johnson, Jeffery C.
Moates, Shiloh
Carley, Kathleen M.
author_facet Van Holt, Tracy
Johnson, Jeffery C.
Moates, Shiloh
Carley, Kathleen M.
author_sort Van Holt, Tracy
collection PubMed
description We inductively tested if a coherent field of inquiry in human conflict research emerged in an analysis of published research involving “conflict” in the Web of Science (WoS) over a 66-year period (1945–2011). We created a citation network that linked the 62,504 WoS records and their cited literature. We performed a critical path analysis (CPA), a specialized social network analysis on this citation network (~1.5 million works), to highlight the main contributions in conflict research and to test if research on conflict has in fact evolved to represent a coherent field of inquiry. Out of this vast dataset, 49 academic works were highlighted by the CPA suggesting a coherent field of inquiry; which means that researchers in the field acknowledge seminal contributions and share a common knowledge base. Other conflict concepts that were also analyzed—such as interpersonal conflict or conflict among pharmaceuticals, for example, did not form their own CP. A single path formed, meaning that there was a cohesive set of ideas that built upon previous research. This is in contrast to a main path analysis of conflict from 1957–1971 where ideas didn’t persist in that multiple paths existed and died or emerged reflecting lack of scientific coherence (Carley, Hummon, and Harty, 1993). The critical path consisted of a number of key features: 1) Concepts that built throughout include the notion that resource availability drives conflict, which emerged in the 1960s-1990s and continued on until 2011. More recent intrastate studies that focused on inequalities emerged from interstate studies on the democracy of peace earlier on the path. 2) Recent research on the path focused on forecasting conflict, which depends on well-developed metrics and theories to model. 3) We used keyword analysis to independently show how the CP was topically linked (i.e., through democracy, modeling, resources, and geography). Publically available conflict datasets developed early on helped shape the operationalization of conflict. In fact, 94% of the works on the CP that analyzed data either relied on publically available datasets, or they generated a dataset and made it public. These datasets appear to be important in the development of conflict research, allowing for cross-case comparisons, and comparisons to previous works.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4849708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48497082016-05-07 The Role of Datasets on Scientific Influence within Conflict Research Van Holt, Tracy Johnson, Jeffery C. Moates, Shiloh Carley, Kathleen M. PLoS One Research Article We inductively tested if a coherent field of inquiry in human conflict research emerged in an analysis of published research involving “conflict” in the Web of Science (WoS) over a 66-year period (1945–2011). We created a citation network that linked the 62,504 WoS records and their cited literature. We performed a critical path analysis (CPA), a specialized social network analysis on this citation network (~1.5 million works), to highlight the main contributions in conflict research and to test if research on conflict has in fact evolved to represent a coherent field of inquiry. Out of this vast dataset, 49 academic works were highlighted by the CPA suggesting a coherent field of inquiry; which means that researchers in the field acknowledge seminal contributions and share a common knowledge base. Other conflict concepts that were also analyzed—such as interpersonal conflict or conflict among pharmaceuticals, for example, did not form their own CP. A single path formed, meaning that there was a cohesive set of ideas that built upon previous research. This is in contrast to a main path analysis of conflict from 1957–1971 where ideas didn’t persist in that multiple paths existed and died or emerged reflecting lack of scientific coherence (Carley, Hummon, and Harty, 1993). The critical path consisted of a number of key features: 1) Concepts that built throughout include the notion that resource availability drives conflict, which emerged in the 1960s-1990s and continued on until 2011. More recent intrastate studies that focused on inequalities emerged from interstate studies on the democracy of peace earlier on the path. 2) Recent research on the path focused on forecasting conflict, which depends on well-developed metrics and theories to model. 3) We used keyword analysis to independently show how the CP was topically linked (i.e., through democracy, modeling, resources, and geography). Publically available conflict datasets developed early on helped shape the operationalization of conflict. In fact, 94% of the works on the CP that analyzed data either relied on publically available datasets, or they generated a dataset and made it public. These datasets appear to be important in the development of conflict research, allowing for cross-case comparisons, and comparisons to previous works. Public Library of Science 2016-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4849708/ /pubmed/27124569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154148 Text en © 2016 Van Holt et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Van Holt, Tracy
Johnson, Jeffery C.
Moates, Shiloh
Carley, Kathleen M.
The Role of Datasets on Scientific Influence within Conflict Research
title The Role of Datasets on Scientific Influence within Conflict Research
title_full The Role of Datasets on Scientific Influence within Conflict Research
title_fullStr The Role of Datasets on Scientific Influence within Conflict Research
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Datasets on Scientific Influence within Conflict Research
title_short The Role of Datasets on Scientific Influence within Conflict Research
title_sort role of datasets on scientific influence within conflict research
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4849708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27124569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154148
work_keys_str_mv AT vanholttracy theroleofdatasetsonscientificinfluencewithinconflictresearch
AT johnsonjefferyc theroleofdatasetsonscientificinfluencewithinconflictresearch
AT moatesshiloh theroleofdatasetsonscientificinfluencewithinconflictresearch
AT carleykathleenm theroleofdatasetsonscientificinfluencewithinconflictresearch
AT vanholttracy roleofdatasetsonscientificinfluencewithinconflictresearch
AT johnsonjefferyc roleofdatasetsonscientificinfluencewithinconflictresearch
AT moatesshiloh roleofdatasetsonscientificinfluencewithinconflictresearch
AT carleykathleenm roleofdatasetsonscientificinfluencewithinconflictresearch