Cargando…

Mechanistically based mapping of human cardiac fibrillation

The mechanisms underpinning human cardiac fibrillation remain elusive. In his 1913 paper ‘On dynamic equilibrium in the heart’, Mines proposed that an activation wave front could propagate repeatedly in a circle, initiated by a stimulus in the vulnerable period. While the dynamics of activation and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Narayan, Sanjiv M., Zaman, Junaid A. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26607671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/JP270513
_version_ 1782429632266502144
author Narayan, Sanjiv M.
Zaman, Junaid A. B.
author_facet Narayan, Sanjiv M.
Zaman, Junaid A. B.
author_sort Narayan, Sanjiv M.
collection PubMed
description The mechanisms underpinning human cardiac fibrillation remain elusive. In his 1913 paper ‘On dynamic equilibrium in the heart’, Mines proposed that an activation wave front could propagate repeatedly in a circle, initiated by a stimulus in the vulnerable period. While the dynamics of activation and recovery are central to cardiac fibrillation, these physiological data are rarely used in clinical mapping. Fibrillation is a rapid irregular rhythm with spatiotemporal disorder resulting from two fundamental mechanisms – sources in preferred cardiac regions or spatially diffuse self‐sustaining activity, i.e. with no preferred source. On close inspection, however, this debate may also reflect mapping technique. Fibrillation is initiated from triggers by regional dispersion in repolarization, slow conduction and wavebreak, then sustained by non‐uniform interactions of these mechanisms. Notably, optical mapping of action potentials in atrial fibrillation (AF) show spiral wave sources (rotors) in nearly all studies including humans, while most traditional electrogram analyses of AF do not. Techniques may diverge in fibrillation because electrograms summate non‐coherent waves within an undefined field whereas optical maps define waves with a visually defined field. Also fibrillation operates at the limits of activation and recovery, which are well represented by action potentials while fibrillatory electrograms poorly represent repolarization. We conclude by suggesting areas for study that may be used, until such time as optical mapping is clinically feasible, to improve mechanistic understanding and therapy of human cardiac fibrillation. [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4850202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48502022016-06-22 Mechanistically based mapping of human cardiac fibrillation Narayan, Sanjiv M. Zaman, Junaid A. B. J Physiol Reviews The mechanisms underpinning human cardiac fibrillation remain elusive. In his 1913 paper ‘On dynamic equilibrium in the heart’, Mines proposed that an activation wave front could propagate repeatedly in a circle, initiated by a stimulus in the vulnerable period. While the dynamics of activation and recovery are central to cardiac fibrillation, these physiological data are rarely used in clinical mapping. Fibrillation is a rapid irregular rhythm with spatiotemporal disorder resulting from two fundamental mechanisms – sources in preferred cardiac regions or spatially diffuse self‐sustaining activity, i.e. with no preferred source. On close inspection, however, this debate may also reflect mapping technique. Fibrillation is initiated from triggers by regional dispersion in repolarization, slow conduction and wavebreak, then sustained by non‐uniform interactions of these mechanisms. Notably, optical mapping of action potentials in atrial fibrillation (AF) show spiral wave sources (rotors) in nearly all studies including humans, while most traditional electrogram analyses of AF do not. Techniques may diverge in fibrillation because electrograms summate non‐coherent waves within an undefined field whereas optical maps define waves with a visually defined field. Also fibrillation operates at the limits of activation and recovery, which are well represented by action potentials while fibrillatory electrograms poorly represent repolarization. We conclude by suggesting areas for study that may be used, until such time as optical mapping is clinically feasible, to improve mechanistic understanding and therapy of human cardiac fibrillation. [Image: see text] John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-01-19 2016-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4850202/ /pubmed/26607671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/JP270513 Text en © 2015 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Physiological Society This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Narayan, Sanjiv M.
Zaman, Junaid A. B.
Mechanistically based mapping of human cardiac fibrillation
title Mechanistically based mapping of human cardiac fibrillation
title_full Mechanistically based mapping of human cardiac fibrillation
title_fullStr Mechanistically based mapping of human cardiac fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Mechanistically based mapping of human cardiac fibrillation
title_short Mechanistically based mapping of human cardiac fibrillation
title_sort mechanistically based mapping of human cardiac fibrillation
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26607671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/JP270513
work_keys_str_mv AT narayansanjivm mechanisticallybasedmappingofhumancardiacfibrillation
AT zamanjunaidab mechanisticallybasedmappingofhumancardiacfibrillation