Cargando…

Cross-sector cooperation in health-enhancing physical activity policymaking: more potential than achievements?

BACKGROUND: The cooperation of actors across policy fields and the need for cross-sector cooperation as well as recommendations on how to implement cross-sector cooperation have been addressed in many national and international policies that seek to solve complex issues within societies. For such a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hämäläinen, Riitta-Maija, Aro, Arja R., Lau, Cathrine Juel, Rus, Diana, Cori, Liliana, Syed, Ahmed M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27129850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0103-6
_version_ 1782429685848735744
author Hämäläinen, Riitta-Maija
Aro, Arja R.
Lau, Cathrine Juel
Rus, Diana
Cori, Liliana
Syed, Ahmed M.
author_facet Hämäläinen, Riitta-Maija
Aro, Arja R.
Lau, Cathrine Juel
Rus, Diana
Cori, Liliana
Syed, Ahmed M.
author_sort Hämäläinen, Riitta-Maija
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The cooperation of actors across policy fields and the need for cross-sector cooperation as well as recommendations on how to implement cross-sector cooperation have been addressed in many national and international policies that seek to solve complex issues within societies. For such a purpose, the relevant governance structure between policy sectors is cross-sector cooperation. Therefore, cross-sector cooperation and its structures need to be better understood for improved implementation. This article reports on the governance structures and processes of cross-sector cooperation in health-enhancing physical activity (HEPA) policies in six European Union (EU) member states. METHODS: Qualitative content analysis of HEPA policies and semi-structured interviews with key policymakers in six European countries. RESULTS: Cross-sector cooperation varied between EU member states within HEPA policies. The main issues of the cross-sector policy process can be divided into stakeholder involvement, governance structures and coordination structures and processes. Stakeholder involvement included citizen hearings and gatherings of stakeholders from various non-governmental organisations and citizen groups. Governance structures with policy and political discussions included committees, working groups and consultations for HEPA policymaking. Coordination structures and processes included administrative processes with various stakeholders, such as ministerial departments, research institutes and private actors for HEPA policymaking. Successful cross-sector cooperation required joint planning and evaluation, financial frameworks, mandates based on laws or agreed methods of work, communication lines, and valued processes of cross-sector cooperation. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sector cooperation required participation with the co-production of goals and sharing of resources between stakeholders, which could, for example, provide mechanisms for collaborative decision-making through citizen hearing. Clearly stated responsibilities, goals, communication, learning and adaptation for cross-sector cooperation improve success. Specific resources allocated for cross-sector cooperation could enhance the empowerment of stakeholders, management of processes and outcomes of cross-sector cooperation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4850638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48506382016-04-30 Cross-sector cooperation in health-enhancing physical activity policymaking: more potential than achievements? Hämäläinen, Riitta-Maija Aro, Arja R. Lau, Cathrine Juel Rus, Diana Cori, Liliana Syed, Ahmed M. Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: The cooperation of actors across policy fields and the need for cross-sector cooperation as well as recommendations on how to implement cross-sector cooperation have been addressed in many national and international policies that seek to solve complex issues within societies. For such a purpose, the relevant governance structure between policy sectors is cross-sector cooperation. Therefore, cross-sector cooperation and its structures need to be better understood for improved implementation. This article reports on the governance structures and processes of cross-sector cooperation in health-enhancing physical activity (HEPA) policies in six European Union (EU) member states. METHODS: Qualitative content analysis of HEPA policies and semi-structured interviews with key policymakers in six European countries. RESULTS: Cross-sector cooperation varied between EU member states within HEPA policies. The main issues of the cross-sector policy process can be divided into stakeholder involvement, governance structures and coordination structures and processes. Stakeholder involvement included citizen hearings and gatherings of stakeholders from various non-governmental organisations and citizen groups. Governance structures with policy and political discussions included committees, working groups and consultations for HEPA policymaking. Coordination structures and processes included administrative processes with various stakeholders, such as ministerial departments, research institutes and private actors for HEPA policymaking. Successful cross-sector cooperation required joint planning and evaluation, financial frameworks, mandates based on laws or agreed methods of work, communication lines, and valued processes of cross-sector cooperation. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sector cooperation required participation with the co-production of goals and sharing of resources between stakeholders, which could, for example, provide mechanisms for collaborative decision-making through citizen hearing. Clearly stated responsibilities, goals, communication, learning and adaptation for cross-sector cooperation improve success. Specific resources allocated for cross-sector cooperation could enhance the empowerment of stakeholders, management of processes and outcomes of cross-sector cooperation. BioMed Central 2016-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4850638/ /pubmed/27129850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0103-6 Text en © Hämäläinen et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hämäläinen, Riitta-Maija
Aro, Arja R.
Lau, Cathrine Juel
Rus, Diana
Cori, Liliana
Syed, Ahmed M.
Cross-sector cooperation in health-enhancing physical activity policymaking: more potential than achievements?
title Cross-sector cooperation in health-enhancing physical activity policymaking: more potential than achievements?
title_full Cross-sector cooperation in health-enhancing physical activity policymaking: more potential than achievements?
title_fullStr Cross-sector cooperation in health-enhancing physical activity policymaking: more potential than achievements?
title_full_unstemmed Cross-sector cooperation in health-enhancing physical activity policymaking: more potential than achievements?
title_short Cross-sector cooperation in health-enhancing physical activity policymaking: more potential than achievements?
title_sort cross-sector cooperation in health-enhancing physical activity policymaking: more potential than achievements?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27129850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0103-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hamalainenriittamaija crosssectorcooperationinhealthenhancingphysicalactivitypolicymakingmorepotentialthanachievements
AT aroarjar crosssectorcooperationinhealthenhancingphysicalactivitypolicymakingmorepotentialthanachievements
AT laucathrinejuel crosssectorcooperationinhealthenhancingphysicalactivitypolicymakingmorepotentialthanachievements
AT rusdiana crosssectorcooperationinhealthenhancingphysicalactivitypolicymakingmorepotentialthanachievements
AT corililiana crosssectorcooperationinhealthenhancingphysicalactivitypolicymakingmorepotentialthanachievements
AT syedahmedm crosssectorcooperationinhealthenhancingphysicalactivitypolicymakingmorepotentialthanachievements
AT crosssectorcooperationinhealthenhancingphysicalactivitypolicymakingmorepotentialthanachievements