Cargando…
Biomimetic substrate control of cellular mechanotransduction
Extracellular mechanophysical signals from both static substrate cue and dynamic mechanical loading have strong potential to regulate cell functions. Most of the studies have adopted either static or dynamic cue and shown that each cue can regulate cell adhesion, spreading, migration, proliferation,...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27134756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0059-1 |
_version_ | 1782429701289017344 |
---|---|
author | Andalib, Mohammad Nahid Dzenis, Yuris Donahue, Henry J. Lim, Jung Yul |
author_facet | Andalib, Mohammad Nahid Dzenis, Yuris Donahue, Henry J. Lim, Jung Yul |
author_sort | Andalib, Mohammad Nahid |
collection | PubMed |
description | Extracellular mechanophysical signals from both static substrate cue and dynamic mechanical loading have strong potential to regulate cell functions. Most of the studies have adopted either static or dynamic cue and shown that each cue can regulate cell adhesion, spreading, migration, proliferation, lineage commitment, and differentiation. However, there is limited information on the integrative control of cell functions by the static and dynamic mechanophysical signals. For example, a majority of dynamic loading studies have tested mechanical stimulation of cells utilizing cultures on flat surfaces without any surface modification. While these approaches have provided significant information on cell mechanotransduction, obtained outcomes may not correctly recapitulate complex cellular mechanosensing milieus in vivo. Several pioneering studies documented cellular response to mechanical stimulations upon cultures with biomimetic substrate modifications. In this min-review, we will highlight key findings on the integrative role of substrate cue (topographic, geometric, etc.) and mechanical stimulation (stretch, fluid shear) in modulating cell function and fate. The integrative approaches, though not fully established yet, will help properly understand cell mechanotransduction under biomimetic mechanophysical environments. This may further lead to advanced functional tissue engineering and regenerative medicine protocols. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4850706 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48507062016-04-30 Biomimetic substrate control of cellular mechanotransduction Andalib, Mohammad Nahid Dzenis, Yuris Donahue, Henry J. Lim, Jung Yul Biomater Res Review Extracellular mechanophysical signals from both static substrate cue and dynamic mechanical loading have strong potential to regulate cell functions. Most of the studies have adopted either static or dynamic cue and shown that each cue can regulate cell adhesion, spreading, migration, proliferation, lineage commitment, and differentiation. However, there is limited information on the integrative control of cell functions by the static and dynamic mechanophysical signals. For example, a majority of dynamic loading studies have tested mechanical stimulation of cells utilizing cultures on flat surfaces without any surface modification. While these approaches have provided significant information on cell mechanotransduction, obtained outcomes may not correctly recapitulate complex cellular mechanosensing milieus in vivo. Several pioneering studies documented cellular response to mechanical stimulations upon cultures with biomimetic substrate modifications. In this min-review, we will highlight key findings on the integrative role of substrate cue (topographic, geometric, etc.) and mechanical stimulation (stretch, fluid shear) in modulating cell function and fate. The integrative approaches, though not fully established yet, will help properly understand cell mechanotransduction under biomimetic mechanophysical environments. This may further lead to advanced functional tissue engineering and regenerative medicine protocols. BioMed Central 2016-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4850706/ /pubmed/27134756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0059-1 Text en © Andalib et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Andalib, Mohammad Nahid Dzenis, Yuris Donahue, Henry J. Lim, Jung Yul Biomimetic substrate control of cellular mechanotransduction |
title | Biomimetic substrate control of cellular mechanotransduction |
title_full | Biomimetic substrate control of cellular mechanotransduction |
title_fullStr | Biomimetic substrate control of cellular mechanotransduction |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomimetic substrate control of cellular mechanotransduction |
title_short | Biomimetic substrate control of cellular mechanotransduction |
title_sort | biomimetic substrate control of cellular mechanotransduction |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27134756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0059-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andalibmohammadnahid biomimeticsubstratecontrolofcellularmechanotransduction AT dzenisyuris biomimeticsubstratecontrolofcellularmechanotransduction AT donahuehenryj biomimeticsubstratecontrolofcellularmechanotransduction AT limjungyul biomimeticsubstratecontrolofcellularmechanotransduction |