Cargando…

Biomimetic substrate control of cellular mechanotransduction

Extracellular mechanophysical signals from both static substrate cue and dynamic mechanical loading have strong potential to regulate cell functions. Most of the studies have adopted either static or dynamic cue and shown that each cue can regulate cell adhesion, spreading, migration, proliferation,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andalib, Mohammad Nahid, Dzenis, Yuris, Donahue, Henry J., Lim, Jung Yul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27134756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0059-1
_version_ 1782429701289017344
author Andalib, Mohammad Nahid
Dzenis, Yuris
Donahue, Henry J.
Lim, Jung Yul
author_facet Andalib, Mohammad Nahid
Dzenis, Yuris
Donahue, Henry J.
Lim, Jung Yul
author_sort Andalib, Mohammad Nahid
collection PubMed
description Extracellular mechanophysical signals from both static substrate cue and dynamic mechanical loading have strong potential to regulate cell functions. Most of the studies have adopted either static or dynamic cue and shown that each cue can regulate cell adhesion, spreading, migration, proliferation, lineage commitment, and differentiation. However, there is limited information on the integrative control of cell functions by the static and dynamic mechanophysical signals. For example, a majority of dynamic loading studies have tested mechanical stimulation of cells utilizing cultures on flat surfaces without any surface modification. While these approaches have provided significant information on cell mechanotransduction, obtained outcomes may not correctly recapitulate complex cellular mechanosensing milieus in vivo. Several pioneering studies documented cellular response to mechanical stimulations upon cultures with biomimetic substrate modifications. In this min-review, we will highlight key findings on the integrative role of substrate cue (topographic, geometric, etc.) and mechanical stimulation (stretch, fluid shear) in modulating cell function and fate. The integrative approaches, though not fully established yet, will help properly understand cell mechanotransduction under biomimetic mechanophysical environments. This may further lead to advanced functional tissue engineering and regenerative medicine protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4850706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48507062016-04-30 Biomimetic substrate control of cellular mechanotransduction Andalib, Mohammad Nahid Dzenis, Yuris Donahue, Henry J. Lim, Jung Yul Biomater Res Review Extracellular mechanophysical signals from both static substrate cue and dynamic mechanical loading have strong potential to regulate cell functions. Most of the studies have adopted either static or dynamic cue and shown that each cue can regulate cell adhesion, spreading, migration, proliferation, lineage commitment, and differentiation. However, there is limited information on the integrative control of cell functions by the static and dynamic mechanophysical signals. For example, a majority of dynamic loading studies have tested mechanical stimulation of cells utilizing cultures on flat surfaces without any surface modification. While these approaches have provided significant information on cell mechanotransduction, obtained outcomes may not correctly recapitulate complex cellular mechanosensing milieus in vivo. Several pioneering studies documented cellular response to mechanical stimulations upon cultures with biomimetic substrate modifications. In this min-review, we will highlight key findings on the integrative role of substrate cue (topographic, geometric, etc.) and mechanical stimulation (stretch, fluid shear) in modulating cell function and fate. The integrative approaches, though not fully established yet, will help properly understand cell mechanotransduction under biomimetic mechanophysical environments. This may further lead to advanced functional tissue engineering and regenerative medicine protocols. BioMed Central 2016-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4850706/ /pubmed/27134756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0059-1 Text en © Andalib et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Andalib, Mohammad Nahid
Dzenis, Yuris
Donahue, Henry J.
Lim, Jung Yul
Biomimetic substrate control of cellular mechanotransduction
title Biomimetic substrate control of cellular mechanotransduction
title_full Biomimetic substrate control of cellular mechanotransduction
title_fullStr Biomimetic substrate control of cellular mechanotransduction
title_full_unstemmed Biomimetic substrate control of cellular mechanotransduction
title_short Biomimetic substrate control of cellular mechanotransduction
title_sort biomimetic substrate control of cellular mechanotransduction
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27134756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0059-1
work_keys_str_mv AT andalibmohammadnahid biomimeticsubstratecontrolofcellularmechanotransduction
AT dzenisyuris biomimeticsubstratecontrolofcellularmechanotransduction
AT donahuehenryj biomimeticsubstratecontrolofcellularmechanotransduction
AT limjungyul biomimeticsubstratecontrolofcellularmechanotransduction