Cargando…

Effects of common groundwater ions on chromate removal by magnetite: importance of chromate adsorption

BACKGROUND: Reductive precipitation of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) with magnetite is a well-known Cr(VI) remediation method to improve water quality. The rapid (<a few hr) reduction of soluble Cr(VI) to insoluble Cr(III) species by Fe(II) in magnetite has been the primary focus of the Cr(VI) rem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meena, Amanda H., Arai, Yuji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27134569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12932-016-0033-9
_version_ 1782429701990514688
author Meena, Amanda H.
Arai, Yuji
author_facet Meena, Amanda H.
Arai, Yuji
author_sort Meena, Amanda H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reductive precipitation of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) with magnetite is a well-known Cr(VI) remediation method to improve water quality. The rapid (<a few hr) reduction of soluble Cr(VI) to insoluble Cr(III) species by Fe(II) in magnetite has been the primary focus of the Cr(VI) removal process in the past. However, the contribution of simultaneous Cr(VI) adsorption processes in aged magnetite has been largely ignored, leaving uncertainties in evaluating the application of in situ Cr remediation technologies for aqueous systems. In this study, effects of common groundwater ions (i.e., nitrate and sulfate) on Cr(VI) sorption to magnetite were investigated using batch geochemical experiments in conjunction with X-ray absorption spectroscopy. RESULTS: In both nitrate and sulfate electrolytes, batch sorption experiments showed that Cr(VI) sorption decreases with increasing pH from 4 to 8. In this pH range, Cr(VI) sorption decreased with increasing ionic strength of sulfate from 0.01 to 0.1 M whereas nitrate concentrations did not alter the Cr(VI) sorption behavior. This indicates the background electrolyte specific Cr(VI) sorption process in magnetite. Under the same ionic strength, Cr(VI) removal in sulfate containing solutions was greater than that in nitrate solutions. This is because the oxidation of Fe(II) by nitrate is more thermodynamically favorable than by sulfate, leaving less reduction capacity of magnetite to reduce Cr(VI) in the nitrate media. X-ray absorption spectroscopy analysis supports the macroscopic evidence that more than 75 % of total Cr on the magnetite surfaces was adsorbed Cr(VI) species after 48 h. CONCLUSION: This experimental geochemical study showed that the adsorption process of Cr(VI) anions was as important as the reductive precipitation of Cr(III) in describing the removal of Cr(VI) by magnetite, and these interfacial adsorption processes could be impacted by common groundwater ions like sulfate and nitrate. The results of this study highlight new information about the large quantity of adsorbed Cr(VI) surface complexes at the magnetite-water interface. It has implications for predicting the long-term stability of Cr at the magnetite-water interface. [Figure: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4850710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48507102016-04-30 Effects of common groundwater ions on chromate removal by magnetite: importance of chromate adsorption Meena, Amanda H. Arai, Yuji Geochem Trans Research Article BACKGROUND: Reductive precipitation of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) with magnetite is a well-known Cr(VI) remediation method to improve water quality. The rapid (<a few hr) reduction of soluble Cr(VI) to insoluble Cr(III) species by Fe(II) in magnetite has been the primary focus of the Cr(VI) removal process in the past. However, the contribution of simultaneous Cr(VI) adsorption processes in aged magnetite has been largely ignored, leaving uncertainties in evaluating the application of in situ Cr remediation technologies for aqueous systems. In this study, effects of common groundwater ions (i.e., nitrate and sulfate) on Cr(VI) sorption to magnetite were investigated using batch geochemical experiments in conjunction with X-ray absorption spectroscopy. RESULTS: In both nitrate and sulfate electrolytes, batch sorption experiments showed that Cr(VI) sorption decreases with increasing pH from 4 to 8. In this pH range, Cr(VI) sorption decreased with increasing ionic strength of sulfate from 0.01 to 0.1 M whereas nitrate concentrations did not alter the Cr(VI) sorption behavior. This indicates the background electrolyte specific Cr(VI) sorption process in magnetite. Under the same ionic strength, Cr(VI) removal in sulfate containing solutions was greater than that in nitrate solutions. This is because the oxidation of Fe(II) by nitrate is more thermodynamically favorable than by sulfate, leaving less reduction capacity of magnetite to reduce Cr(VI) in the nitrate media. X-ray absorption spectroscopy analysis supports the macroscopic evidence that more than 75 % of total Cr on the magnetite surfaces was adsorbed Cr(VI) species after 48 h. CONCLUSION: This experimental geochemical study showed that the adsorption process of Cr(VI) anions was as important as the reductive precipitation of Cr(III) in describing the removal of Cr(VI) by magnetite, and these interfacial adsorption processes could be impacted by common groundwater ions like sulfate and nitrate. The results of this study highlight new information about the large quantity of adsorbed Cr(VI) surface complexes at the magnetite-water interface. It has implications for predicting the long-term stability of Cr at the magnetite-water interface. [Figure: see text] Springer International Publishing 2016-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4850710/ /pubmed/27134569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12932-016-0033-9 Text en © Meena and Arai. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Meena, Amanda H.
Arai, Yuji
Effects of common groundwater ions on chromate removal by magnetite: importance of chromate adsorption
title Effects of common groundwater ions on chromate removal by magnetite: importance of chromate adsorption
title_full Effects of common groundwater ions on chromate removal by magnetite: importance of chromate adsorption
title_fullStr Effects of common groundwater ions on chromate removal by magnetite: importance of chromate adsorption
title_full_unstemmed Effects of common groundwater ions on chromate removal by magnetite: importance of chromate adsorption
title_short Effects of common groundwater ions on chromate removal by magnetite: importance of chromate adsorption
title_sort effects of common groundwater ions on chromate removal by magnetite: importance of chromate adsorption
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27134569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12932-016-0033-9
work_keys_str_mv AT meenaamandah effectsofcommongroundwaterionsonchromateremovalbymagnetiteimportanceofchromateadsorption
AT araiyuji effectsofcommongroundwaterionsonchromateremovalbymagnetiteimportanceofchromateadsorption