Cargando…
Endoscopic ultrasonography versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for suspected choledocholithiasis: Comments from the radiologists’
Autores principales: | Pan, Shen, Guo, Qiyong |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27080612 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.180477 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in suspected choledocholithiasis: A systematic review
por: De Castro, Vinicius Leite, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Sensitivity and Specificity of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography versus Endoscopic Ultrasonography against Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Diagnosing Choledocholithiasis: The Indonesian Experience
por: Makmun, Dadang, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
The accuracy of 3T magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in suspected choledocholithiasis
por: Yeniçeri, Önder, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Can Endoscopic Ultrasonography Prevent Unnecessary Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with High and Intermediate Likelihood of Choledocholithiasis?
por: Kim, Eui Joo, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY AND PERIOPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH SUSPECT CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS
por: PERALES, Simone Reges, et al.
Publicado: (2019)