Cargando…

Clinical impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

AIM: To reveal the impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 242 patients who underwent surgery for PDAC at our institution between January 1996 and July 2012. Am...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsutsumi, Hideharu, Hara, Kazuo, Mizuno, Nobumasa, Hijioka, Susumu, Imaoka, Hiroshi, Tajika, Masahiro, Tanaka, Tsutomu, Ishihara, Makoto, Yoshimura, Kenichi, Shimizu, Yasuhiro, Niwa, Yasumasa, Sasaki, Yutaka, Yamao, Kenji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27080607
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.180472
_version_ 1782429720548212736
author Tsutsumi, Hideharu
Hara, Kazuo
Mizuno, Nobumasa
Hijioka, Susumu
Imaoka, Hiroshi
Tajika, Masahiro
Tanaka, Tsutomu
Ishihara, Makoto
Yoshimura, Kenichi
Shimizu, Yasuhiro
Niwa, Yasumasa
Sasaki, Yutaka
Yamao, Kenji
author_facet Tsutsumi, Hideharu
Hara, Kazuo
Mizuno, Nobumasa
Hijioka, Susumu
Imaoka, Hiroshi
Tajika, Masahiro
Tanaka, Tsutomu
Ishihara, Makoto
Yoshimura, Kenichi
Shimizu, Yasuhiro
Niwa, Yasumasa
Sasaki, Yutaka
Yamao, Kenji
author_sort Tsutsumi, Hideharu
collection PubMed
description AIM: To reveal the impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 242 patients who underwent surgery for PDAC at our institution between January 1996 and July 2012. Among them, there were three patients with R2 resection and 30 patients with a follow-up period of less than 1 year, who were excluded because they did not meet the conditions for evaluating recurrence. Consequently, 209 patients were enrolled in the present study. The patients were divided into two groups: 126 patients who underwent preoperative EUS-FNA (FNA group) and 83 patients who did not (non-FNA group) undergo preoperative EUS-FNA. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between FNA and non-FNA groups except mean age (66.6 ± 8.9 years vs. 63.5 ± 8.9 years, respectively, P = 0.02) and the administration rate of gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy (42.9% vs. 18.1%, P < 0.01). Sampling adequacy of preoperative EUS-FNA was 99.2% (125/126) and sensitivity for diagnosis was 92.9% (117/126). The rate of complications related to EUS-FNA was 1.6% (2/126); two patients experienced reduction in hemoglobin (≥2.0 g/dL). These two patients did not have any apparent bleeding and could be managed conservatively. No severe complications were seen. We evaluated long-term outcomes of preoperative EUS-FNA, especially disease-free survival, needle-track seeding and recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated no significant difference in disease-free survival between the two groups (P = 0.12). The site of recurrence was not significantly different between groups. Needle-track seeding was not observed in this study. Multivariate analysis of recurrence factors showed that preoperative EUS-FNA did not affect postoperative recurrence. CONCLUSION: Preoperative EUS-FNA for PDAC was shown to be a safe procedure with high diagnostic ability, and not a risk factor for postoperative recurrence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4850801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48508012016-05-03 Clinical impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma Tsutsumi, Hideharu Hara, Kazuo Mizuno, Nobumasa Hijioka, Susumu Imaoka, Hiroshi Tajika, Masahiro Tanaka, Tsutomu Ishihara, Makoto Yoshimura, Kenichi Shimizu, Yasuhiro Niwa, Yasumasa Sasaki, Yutaka Yamao, Kenji Endosc Ultrasound Original Article AIM: To reveal the impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 242 patients who underwent surgery for PDAC at our institution between January 1996 and July 2012. Among them, there were three patients with R2 resection and 30 patients with a follow-up period of less than 1 year, who were excluded because they did not meet the conditions for evaluating recurrence. Consequently, 209 patients were enrolled in the present study. The patients were divided into two groups: 126 patients who underwent preoperative EUS-FNA (FNA group) and 83 patients who did not (non-FNA group) undergo preoperative EUS-FNA. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between FNA and non-FNA groups except mean age (66.6 ± 8.9 years vs. 63.5 ± 8.9 years, respectively, P = 0.02) and the administration rate of gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy (42.9% vs. 18.1%, P < 0.01). Sampling adequacy of preoperative EUS-FNA was 99.2% (125/126) and sensitivity for diagnosis was 92.9% (117/126). The rate of complications related to EUS-FNA was 1.6% (2/126); two patients experienced reduction in hemoglobin (≥2.0 g/dL). These two patients did not have any apparent bleeding and could be managed conservatively. No severe complications were seen. We evaluated long-term outcomes of preoperative EUS-FNA, especially disease-free survival, needle-track seeding and recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated no significant difference in disease-free survival between the two groups (P = 0.12). The site of recurrence was not significantly different between groups. Needle-track seeding was not observed in this study. Multivariate analysis of recurrence factors showed that preoperative EUS-FNA did not affect postoperative recurrence. CONCLUSION: Preoperative EUS-FNA for PDAC was shown to be a safe procedure with high diagnostic ability, and not a risk factor for postoperative recurrence. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4850801/ /pubmed/27080607 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.180472 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Spring Media Publishing Co. Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tsutsumi, Hideharu
Hara, Kazuo
Mizuno, Nobumasa
Hijioka, Susumu
Imaoka, Hiroshi
Tajika, Masahiro
Tanaka, Tsutomu
Ishihara, Makoto
Yoshimura, Kenichi
Shimizu, Yasuhiro
Niwa, Yasumasa
Sasaki, Yutaka
Yamao, Kenji
Clinical impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title Clinical impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title_full Clinical impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title_fullStr Clinical impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Clinical impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title_short Clinical impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
title_sort clinical impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27080607
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.180472
work_keys_str_mv AT tsutsumihideharu clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT harakazuo clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT mizunonobumasa clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT hijiokasusumu clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT imaokahiroshi clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT tajikamasahiro clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT tanakatsutomu clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT ishiharamakoto clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT yoshimurakenichi clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT shimizuyasuhiro clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT niwayasumasa clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT sasakiyutaka clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma
AT yamaokenji clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma