Cargando…
Clinical impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
AIM: To reveal the impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 242 patients who underwent surgery for PDAC at our institution between January 1996 and July 2012. Am...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27080607 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.180472 |
_version_ | 1782429720548212736 |
---|---|
author | Tsutsumi, Hideharu Hara, Kazuo Mizuno, Nobumasa Hijioka, Susumu Imaoka, Hiroshi Tajika, Masahiro Tanaka, Tsutomu Ishihara, Makoto Yoshimura, Kenichi Shimizu, Yasuhiro Niwa, Yasumasa Sasaki, Yutaka Yamao, Kenji |
author_facet | Tsutsumi, Hideharu Hara, Kazuo Mizuno, Nobumasa Hijioka, Susumu Imaoka, Hiroshi Tajika, Masahiro Tanaka, Tsutomu Ishihara, Makoto Yoshimura, Kenichi Shimizu, Yasuhiro Niwa, Yasumasa Sasaki, Yutaka Yamao, Kenji |
author_sort | Tsutsumi, Hideharu |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To reveal the impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 242 patients who underwent surgery for PDAC at our institution between January 1996 and July 2012. Among them, there were three patients with R2 resection and 30 patients with a follow-up period of less than 1 year, who were excluded because they did not meet the conditions for evaluating recurrence. Consequently, 209 patients were enrolled in the present study. The patients were divided into two groups: 126 patients who underwent preoperative EUS-FNA (FNA group) and 83 patients who did not (non-FNA group) undergo preoperative EUS-FNA. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between FNA and non-FNA groups except mean age (66.6 ± 8.9 years vs. 63.5 ± 8.9 years, respectively, P = 0.02) and the administration rate of gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy (42.9% vs. 18.1%, P < 0.01). Sampling adequacy of preoperative EUS-FNA was 99.2% (125/126) and sensitivity for diagnosis was 92.9% (117/126). The rate of complications related to EUS-FNA was 1.6% (2/126); two patients experienced reduction in hemoglobin (≥2.0 g/dL). These two patients did not have any apparent bleeding and could be managed conservatively. No severe complications were seen. We evaluated long-term outcomes of preoperative EUS-FNA, especially disease-free survival, needle-track seeding and recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated no significant difference in disease-free survival between the two groups (P = 0.12). The site of recurrence was not significantly different between groups. Needle-track seeding was not observed in this study. Multivariate analysis of recurrence factors showed that preoperative EUS-FNA did not affect postoperative recurrence. CONCLUSION: Preoperative EUS-FNA for PDAC was shown to be a safe procedure with high diagnostic ability, and not a risk factor for postoperative recurrence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4850801 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48508012016-05-03 Clinical impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma Tsutsumi, Hideharu Hara, Kazuo Mizuno, Nobumasa Hijioka, Susumu Imaoka, Hiroshi Tajika, Masahiro Tanaka, Tsutomu Ishihara, Makoto Yoshimura, Kenichi Shimizu, Yasuhiro Niwa, Yasumasa Sasaki, Yutaka Yamao, Kenji Endosc Ultrasound Original Article AIM: To reveal the impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 242 patients who underwent surgery for PDAC at our institution between January 1996 and July 2012. Among them, there were three patients with R2 resection and 30 patients with a follow-up period of less than 1 year, who were excluded because they did not meet the conditions for evaluating recurrence. Consequently, 209 patients were enrolled in the present study. The patients were divided into two groups: 126 patients who underwent preoperative EUS-FNA (FNA group) and 83 patients who did not (non-FNA group) undergo preoperative EUS-FNA. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between FNA and non-FNA groups except mean age (66.6 ± 8.9 years vs. 63.5 ± 8.9 years, respectively, P = 0.02) and the administration rate of gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy (42.9% vs. 18.1%, P < 0.01). Sampling adequacy of preoperative EUS-FNA was 99.2% (125/126) and sensitivity for diagnosis was 92.9% (117/126). The rate of complications related to EUS-FNA was 1.6% (2/126); two patients experienced reduction in hemoglobin (≥2.0 g/dL). These two patients did not have any apparent bleeding and could be managed conservatively. No severe complications were seen. We evaluated long-term outcomes of preoperative EUS-FNA, especially disease-free survival, needle-track seeding and recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated no significant difference in disease-free survival between the two groups (P = 0.12). The site of recurrence was not significantly different between groups. Needle-track seeding was not observed in this study. Multivariate analysis of recurrence factors showed that preoperative EUS-FNA did not affect postoperative recurrence. CONCLUSION: Preoperative EUS-FNA for PDAC was shown to be a safe procedure with high diagnostic ability, and not a risk factor for postoperative recurrence. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4850801/ /pubmed/27080607 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.180472 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Spring Media Publishing Co. Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tsutsumi, Hideharu Hara, Kazuo Mizuno, Nobumasa Hijioka, Susumu Imaoka, Hiroshi Tajika, Masahiro Tanaka, Tsutomu Ishihara, Makoto Yoshimura, Kenichi Shimizu, Yasuhiro Niwa, Yasumasa Sasaki, Yutaka Yamao, Kenji Clinical impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma |
title | Clinical impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma |
title_full | Clinical impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma |
title_fullStr | Clinical impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma |
title_short | Clinical impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma |
title_sort | clinical impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27080607 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.180472 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsutsumihideharu clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT harakazuo clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT mizunonobumasa clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT hijiokasusumu clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT imaokahiroshi clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT tajikamasahiro clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT tanakatsutomu clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT ishiharamakoto clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT yoshimurakenichi clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT shimizuyasuhiro clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT niwayasumasa clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT sasakiyutaka clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT yamaokenji clinicalimpactofpreoperativeendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationforpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma |