Cargando…

Initial Staging of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer and Regional Lymph Nodes: Comparison of Diffusion-Weighted MRI With 18F-FDG-PET/CT

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to compare diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) parameters with (18)F-FDG PET/CT in primary locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). METHODS: From October 2012 to September 2014, 24 patients with histologically confirmed and untreated LARC (T3–T4) prospectively underwent a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cerny, Milena, Dunet, Vincent, Prior, John Olivier, Hahnloser, Dieter, Wagner, Anna Dorothea, Meuli, Reto Antoine, Schmidt, Sabine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4851242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26828149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000001172
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to compare diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) parameters with (18)F-FDG PET/CT in primary locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). METHODS: From October 2012 to September 2014, 24 patients with histologically confirmed and untreated LARC (T3–T4) prospectively underwent a pelvic 1.5-T DW-MRI (b = 0 s/mm(2), b = 600 s/mm(2)) and a whole-body (18)F-FDG PET/CT, before neoadjuvant therapy. The 2 examinations were performed on the same day. Two readers measured (18)F-FDG SUVmax and SUVmean of the rectal tumor and of the pathological regional lymph nodes on PET/CT and compared these with minimum and mean values of the ADC (ADCmin and ADCmean) on maps generated from DW-MRI. The diagnostic performance of ADC values in identifying pathological lymph nodes was also assessed. RESULTS: Regarding tumors (n = 24), we found a significant negative correlation between SUVmean and corresponding ADCmean values (ρ = −0.61, P = 0.0017) and between ADCmin and SUVmax (ρ = −0.66, P = 0.0005). Regarding the lymph nodes (n = 63), there was a significant negative correlation between ADCmean and SUVmean values (ρ = −0.38, P = 0.0021), but not between ADCmin and SUVmax values (ρ = −0.11, P = 0.41). Neither ADCmean nor ADCmin values helped distinguish pathological from benign lymph nodes (AUC of 0.24 [confidence interval, 0.10–0.38] and 0.41 [confidence interval, 0.22–0.60], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The correlations between ADCmean and SUVmean suggest an association between tumor cellularity and metabolic activity in untreated LARC and in regional lymph nodes. However, compared with (18)F-FDG PET/CT, ADC values are not reliable for identifying pathological lymph nodes.