Cargando…

Efficiency of Local Antiseptic Alkosol (Ethanol, Isopropanol-30g and Ortophenilphenol) and Povidone Iodide on the Incidence Of Surgical Site Infection After Inguinal Hernioplasty

BACKGROUND: The risk of wound infection after elective inguinal hernia repair depends on several factors. One of the most important factors is the preoperative skin preparation. The use of antisepsis is performed to reduce the risk of surgical site infections (SSIs) and to remove causing organisms....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Djozic, Harun, Pandza, Haris, Hasukic, Sefik, Custovic, Samir, Pandza, Berina, Krupalija, Amina, Beciragic, Edin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4851501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27147783
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2016.70.108-111
_version_ 1782429826607480832
author Djozic, Harun
Pandza, Haris
Hasukic, Sefik
Custovic, Samir
Pandza, Berina
Krupalija, Amina
Beciragic, Edin
author_facet Djozic, Harun
Pandza, Haris
Hasukic, Sefik
Custovic, Samir
Pandza, Berina
Krupalija, Amina
Beciragic, Edin
author_sort Djozic, Harun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The risk of wound infection after elective inguinal hernia repair depends on several factors. One of the most important factors is the preoperative skin preparation. The use of antisepsis is performed to reduce the risk of surgical site infections (SSIs) and to remove causing organisms. This work compares two different agent forms for preoperative skin preparation to prevent SSIs. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study is comparing the effects of two different agents used for preoperative skin preparation and prevention of SSIs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 100 adult patients were divided and randomized into two groups, each containing 50 patients. Both groups included patients that are scheduled for elective Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. The first group includes patients whose skin preparations were done with povidone iodine (PI) only. The second group included patients that are treated with two antiseptics; Alkosol (96% ethanol, isopropanol-30g and ortophenilphenol-0.1g) and povidone iodide. Alkosol is applied before the induction of anesthesia. The povidone iodide is applied after Alkosol has evaporated. The presence of bacterial growth in the wound was determined 24 and 48 hours after operation. Swabs were used to take samples, which were then cultivated to check for bacterial growth. The presence of infection was also determined by the following criteria: pain or tenderness, induration, erythema, local warmth of the wound etc. RESULTS: The surgeon or clinician declared that after 24 hours the wound was infected in 20 patients in the control group and in 22 patients after 48 hours. In the Alkosol (96% ethanol, isopropanol-30g and ortophenilphenol-0.1g) and povidone iodide group infection was declared in only 3 patients after 24 hours. DISCUSSION: Compared to the use of providone only, the use of Alkosol (96% ethanol, isopropanol-30g and ortophenilphenol-0.1g) and povidone iodide has many advantages and was associated with lower rates of SSIs following clean surgery. A larger trial is warranted in order to add definitive and more conclusive data to the current evidence base.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4851501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48515012016-05-04 Efficiency of Local Antiseptic Alkosol (Ethanol, Isopropanol-30g and Ortophenilphenol) and Povidone Iodide on the Incidence Of Surgical Site Infection After Inguinal Hernioplasty Djozic, Harun Pandza, Haris Hasukic, Sefik Custovic, Samir Pandza, Berina Krupalija, Amina Beciragic, Edin Med Arch Original Paper BACKGROUND: The risk of wound infection after elective inguinal hernia repair depends on several factors. One of the most important factors is the preoperative skin preparation. The use of antisepsis is performed to reduce the risk of surgical site infections (SSIs) and to remove causing organisms. This work compares two different agent forms for preoperative skin preparation to prevent SSIs. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study is comparing the effects of two different agents used for preoperative skin preparation and prevention of SSIs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 100 adult patients were divided and randomized into two groups, each containing 50 patients. Both groups included patients that are scheduled for elective Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. The first group includes patients whose skin preparations were done with povidone iodine (PI) only. The second group included patients that are treated with two antiseptics; Alkosol (96% ethanol, isopropanol-30g and ortophenilphenol-0.1g) and povidone iodide. Alkosol is applied before the induction of anesthesia. The povidone iodide is applied after Alkosol has evaporated. The presence of bacterial growth in the wound was determined 24 and 48 hours after operation. Swabs were used to take samples, which were then cultivated to check for bacterial growth. The presence of infection was also determined by the following criteria: pain or tenderness, induration, erythema, local warmth of the wound etc. RESULTS: The surgeon or clinician declared that after 24 hours the wound was infected in 20 patients in the control group and in 22 patients after 48 hours. In the Alkosol (96% ethanol, isopropanol-30g and ortophenilphenol-0.1g) and povidone iodide group infection was declared in only 3 patients after 24 hours. DISCUSSION: Compared to the use of providone only, the use of Alkosol (96% ethanol, isopropanol-30g and ortophenilphenol-0.1g) and povidone iodide has many advantages and was associated with lower rates of SSIs following clean surgery. A larger trial is warranted in order to add definitive and more conclusive data to the current evidence base. AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2016-04 2016-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4851501/ /pubmed/27147783 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2016.70.108-111 Text en Copyright: © Harun Djozic, Haris Pandza, Sefik Hasukic, Samir Custovic, Berina Pandza, Amina Krupalija, and Edin Beciragic http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Djozic, Harun
Pandza, Haris
Hasukic, Sefik
Custovic, Samir
Pandza, Berina
Krupalija, Amina
Beciragic, Edin
Efficiency of Local Antiseptic Alkosol (Ethanol, Isopropanol-30g and Ortophenilphenol) and Povidone Iodide on the Incidence Of Surgical Site Infection After Inguinal Hernioplasty
title Efficiency of Local Antiseptic Alkosol (Ethanol, Isopropanol-30g and Ortophenilphenol) and Povidone Iodide on the Incidence Of Surgical Site Infection After Inguinal Hernioplasty
title_full Efficiency of Local Antiseptic Alkosol (Ethanol, Isopropanol-30g and Ortophenilphenol) and Povidone Iodide on the Incidence Of Surgical Site Infection After Inguinal Hernioplasty
title_fullStr Efficiency of Local Antiseptic Alkosol (Ethanol, Isopropanol-30g and Ortophenilphenol) and Povidone Iodide on the Incidence Of Surgical Site Infection After Inguinal Hernioplasty
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency of Local Antiseptic Alkosol (Ethanol, Isopropanol-30g and Ortophenilphenol) and Povidone Iodide on the Incidence Of Surgical Site Infection After Inguinal Hernioplasty
title_short Efficiency of Local Antiseptic Alkosol (Ethanol, Isopropanol-30g and Ortophenilphenol) and Povidone Iodide on the Incidence Of Surgical Site Infection After Inguinal Hernioplasty
title_sort efficiency of local antiseptic alkosol (ethanol, isopropanol-30g and ortophenilphenol) and povidone iodide on the incidence of surgical site infection after inguinal hernioplasty
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4851501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27147783
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2016.70.108-111
work_keys_str_mv AT djozicharun efficiencyoflocalantisepticalkosolethanolisopropanol30gandortophenilphenolandpovidoneiodideontheincidenceofsurgicalsiteinfectionafteringuinalhernioplasty
AT pandzaharis efficiencyoflocalantisepticalkosolethanolisopropanol30gandortophenilphenolandpovidoneiodideontheincidenceofsurgicalsiteinfectionafteringuinalhernioplasty
AT hasukicsefik efficiencyoflocalantisepticalkosolethanolisopropanol30gandortophenilphenolandpovidoneiodideontheincidenceofsurgicalsiteinfectionafteringuinalhernioplasty
AT custovicsamir efficiencyoflocalantisepticalkosolethanolisopropanol30gandortophenilphenolandpovidoneiodideontheincidenceofsurgicalsiteinfectionafteringuinalhernioplasty
AT pandzaberina efficiencyoflocalantisepticalkosolethanolisopropanol30gandortophenilphenolandpovidoneiodideontheincidenceofsurgicalsiteinfectionafteringuinalhernioplasty
AT krupalijaamina efficiencyoflocalantisepticalkosolethanolisopropanol30gandortophenilphenolandpovidoneiodideontheincidenceofsurgicalsiteinfectionafteringuinalhernioplasty
AT beciragicedin efficiencyoflocalantisepticalkosolethanolisopropanol30gandortophenilphenolandpovidoneiodideontheincidenceofsurgicalsiteinfectionafteringuinalhernioplasty