Cargando…

The Actual (Un)usefulness of the Bologna System in Medical Education

INTRODUCTION: Faculty of Medicine, University of Sarajevo has officially started working on 22.11.1944, and is the oldest faculty in the medical field in Bosnia and Herzegovina. At the same time there are two systems of organization of the teaching process, the old system and the Bologna system. AIM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Masic, Izet, Begic, Edin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4851506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27147795
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2016.70.158-163
_version_ 1782429827760914432
author Masic, Izet
Begic, Edin
author_facet Masic, Izet
Begic, Edin
author_sort Masic, Izet
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Faculty of Medicine, University of Sarajevo has officially started working on 22.11.1944, and is the oldest faculty in the medical field in Bosnia and Herzegovina. At the same time there are two systems of organization of the teaching process, the old system and the Bologna system. AIM: To analyze the implementation of the Bologna system, and making an overview of its justification. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Answers from questionnaires from total of 459 students were analyzed (197 who had studied under the old system and 262 who studied under the Bologna system), so total of four generations of the Bologna system. They filled out a questionnaire in which they evaluated the teaching process. Student’s opinion about quality of medical education was measured by modified Lickert scale. RESULTS: Students of old system are older than students of the Bologna process, whose average age is increasing from generation to generation, given the growing number of students who repeat a year. All students of old system repeated an academic year once or several times (p <0.05). Analysis of average grades showed statistically significant difference (p <0.05), where students in the Bologna system had higher averages than students who were studying under the old system. The presence of large number of female students, in both systems is significant (p <0.05). Out of 33 questions about satisfaction of class, 15 were answered with better average grade from students of the Bologna system. A slight improvement in the Bologna system is in terms of the evaluation of the quality of the educational process (teachers, methods, effects). The only significant progress has been proven in terms of rating the degree of computerization of the educational process–general records on enrolled students (old system vs Bologna system–3,44 vs 3,63), record of attendance (3,47 vs 3,73), obtaining certificates (3,08 vs 3,84), method of registration of exam (2,98 vs 3,71), method of practical exam (3,06 vs 3,36) and theoretical methods of taking exam (3,01 vs 3,14). Average grades where no average grade, on any issue, does not reach grade 4 of Likert Scale, talks about real problems of education in medical field. CONCLUSION: In a relatively large sample (four generations of students) true benefit and progress of the Bologna system has not been proven, in comparison to the old system. Bologna system has eased the students in the administrative sense by introduction of computerization of faculties, but the old problems and old questions about the organization’s process and delivery have not been eliminated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4851506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48515062016-05-04 The Actual (Un)usefulness of the Bologna System in Medical Education Masic, Izet Begic, Edin Med Arch Dilemmas INTRODUCTION: Faculty of Medicine, University of Sarajevo has officially started working on 22.11.1944, and is the oldest faculty in the medical field in Bosnia and Herzegovina. At the same time there are two systems of organization of the teaching process, the old system and the Bologna system. AIM: To analyze the implementation of the Bologna system, and making an overview of its justification. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Answers from questionnaires from total of 459 students were analyzed (197 who had studied under the old system and 262 who studied under the Bologna system), so total of four generations of the Bologna system. They filled out a questionnaire in which they evaluated the teaching process. Student’s opinion about quality of medical education was measured by modified Lickert scale. RESULTS: Students of old system are older than students of the Bologna process, whose average age is increasing from generation to generation, given the growing number of students who repeat a year. All students of old system repeated an academic year once or several times (p <0.05). Analysis of average grades showed statistically significant difference (p <0.05), where students in the Bologna system had higher averages than students who were studying under the old system. The presence of large number of female students, in both systems is significant (p <0.05). Out of 33 questions about satisfaction of class, 15 were answered with better average grade from students of the Bologna system. A slight improvement in the Bologna system is in terms of the evaluation of the quality of the educational process (teachers, methods, effects). The only significant progress has been proven in terms of rating the degree of computerization of the educational process–general records on enrolled students (old system vs Bologna system–3,44 vs 3,63), record of attendance (3,47 vs 3,73), obtaining certificates (3,08 vs 3,84), method of registration of exam (2,98 vs 3,71), method of practical exam (3,06 vs 3,36) and theoretical methods of taking exam (3,01 vs 3,14). Average grades where no average grade, on any issue, does not reach grade 4 of Likert Scale, talks about real problems of education in medical field. CONCLUSION: In a relatively large sample (four generations of students) true benefit and progress of the Bologna system has not been proven, in comparison to the old system. Bologna system has eased the students in the administrative sense by introduction of computerization of faculties, but the old problems and old questions about the organization’s process and delivery have not been eliminated. AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2016-04 2016-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4851506/ /pubmed/27147795 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2016.70.158-163 Text en Copyright: © Izet Masic, and Edin Begic http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Dilemmas
Masic, Izet
Begic, Edin
The Actual (Un)usefulness of the Bologna System in Medical Education
title The Actual (Un)usefulness of the Bologna System in Medical Education
title_full The Actual (Un)usefulness of the Bologna System in Medical Education
title_fullStr The Actual (Un)usefulness of the Bologna System in Medical Education
title_full_unstemmed The Actual (Un)usefulness of the Bologna System in Medical Education
title_short The Actual (Un)usefulness of the Bologna System in Medical Education
title_sort actual (un)usefulness of the bologna system in medical education
topic Dilemmas
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4851506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27147795
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2016.70.158-163
work_keys_str_mv AT masicizet theactualunusefulnessofthebolognasysteminmedicaleducation
AT begicedin theactualunusefulnessofthebolognasysteminmedicaleducation
AT masicizet actualunusefulnessofthebolognasysteminmedicaleducation
AT begicedin actualunusefulnessofthebolognasysteminmedicaleducation