Cargando…

Evaluation of Diagnostic Methods in the Differentiation of Heart Murmurs in Children

INTRODUCTION: The most common clinical sign in pediatric cardiology is a heart murmur (organic and inorganic). Organic are sign of heart disease, while inorganic (basically divided into accidental and functional) murmurs occur on anatomically healthy heart. AIM: To determine the justification of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Begic, Zijo, Dinarevic, Senka Mesihovic, Pesto, Senad, Begic, Edin, Dobraca, Amra, Masic, Izet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4851509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27147798
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.94-98
_version_ 1782429828458217472
author Begic, Zijo
Dinarevic, Senka Mesihovic
Pesto, Senad
Begic, Edin
Dobraca, Amra
Masic, Izet
author_facet Begic, Zijo
Dinarevic, Senka Mesihovic
Pesto, Senad
Begic, Edin
Dobraca, Amra
Masic, Izet
author_sort Begic, Zijo
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The most common clinical sign in pediatric cardiology is a heart murmur (organic and inorganic). Organic are sign of heart disease, while inorganic (basically divided into accidental and functional) murmurs occur on anatomically healthy heart. AIM: To determine the justification of the application of the methods of cardiac treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Study included 116 children aged from 1 to 15 years, who were referred due to cardiac treatment to Pediatric Clinic, of Sarajevo University Clinical Center. RESULTS: The first group consisted of children with innocent heart murmur, 97 (53 males). The second group consisted of patients with organic murmur, 19 (13 males). The average age of the first group was 7.69 (1.01–15.01) years old, and of the second group 3.15 (1.01- 8.06) years old, and there is a significant difference between these two groups (p <0.001). Medical history questions about potentially harmful habits of mother in pregnancy, found significant differences in the frequency of the existence of habits between the first and second groups of subjects (14.44% vs. 85.1%, p = 0.013). The values of the pulse of patients showed statistically significant difference (p = 0.012). The most common place of the murmurs’ appearance is the second left intercostal space. In the first group, the most common were vibratory (32.3%) and ejection (31.9%) and in the second the most common were holosystolic (73.7%) murmur. Analyzing the R/S ratio of V1, a significant difference among the two groups was found (mean 0.78 vs. the values for 1.45, p = 0.003). There is a significance in terms of developed hypertrophy of the heart cavities (BVH) between the two groups. The most common accidental murmur was classic vibratory Still’s murmurs (55.43%) and the most common congenital heart defects was ASD (36.8%). CONCLUSIONS: A heart murmur itself, should not be the purpose of auscultation. One of the tasks of pediatricians, pediatric cardiologists in particular would be to improve auscultation, as a sovereign method of heart murmurs assessment. Heart murmur assessment should be adapted to recognize whether heart murmur is innocent, or there is suspected or probable congenital heart defect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4851509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48515092016-05-04 Evaluation of Diagnostic Methods in the Differentiation of Heart Murmurs in Children Begic, Zijo Dinarevic, Senka Mesihovic Pesto, Senad Begic, Edin Dobraca, Amra Masic, Izet Acta Inform Med Original Paper INTRODUCTION: The most common clinical sign in pediatric cardiology is a heart murmur (organic and inorganic). Organic are sign of heart disease, while inorganic (basically divided into accidental and functional) murmurs occur on anatomically healthy heart. AIM: To determine the justification of the application of the methods of cardiac treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Study included 116 children aged from 1 to 15 years, who were referred due to cardiac treatment to Pediatric Clinic, of Sarajevo University Clinical Center. RESULTS: The first group consisted of children with innocent heart murmur, 97 (53 males). The second group consisted of patients with organic murmur, 19 (13 males). The average age of the first group was 7.69 (1.01–15.01) years old, and of the second group 3.15 (1.01- 8.06) years old, and there is a significant difference between these two groups (p <0.001). Medical history questions about potentially harmful habits of mother in pregnancy, found significant differences in the frequency of the existence of habits between the first and second groups of subjects (14.44% vs. 85.1%, p = 0.013). The values of the pulse of patients showed statistically significant difference (p = 0.012). The most common place of the murmurs’ appearance is the second left intercostal space. In the first group, the most common were vibratory (32.3%) and ejection (31.9%) and in the second the most common were holosystolic (73.7%) murmur. Analyzing the R/S ratio of V1, a significant difference among the two groups was found (mean 0.78 vs. the values for 1.45, p = 0.003). There is a significance in terms of developed hypertrophy of the heart cavities (BVH) between the two groups. The most common accidental murmur was classic vibratory Still’s murmurs (55.43%) and the most common congenital heart defects was ASD (36.8%). CONCLUSIONS: A heart murmur itself, should not be the purpose of auscultation. One of the tasks of pediatricians, pediatric cardiologists in particular would be to improve auscultation, as a sovereign method of heart murmurs assessment. Heart murmur assessment should be adapted to recognize whether heart murmur is innocent, or there is suspected or probable congenital heart defect. AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2016-04 2016-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4851509/ /pubmed/27147798 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.94-98 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Zijo Begic, Senad Pesto, Senka Mesihovic Dinarevic, Edin Begic, Amra Dobraca, Izet Masic http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Begic, Zijo
Dinarevic, Senka Mesihovic
Pesto, Senad
Begic, Edin
Dobraca, Amra
Masic, Izet
Evaluation of Diagnostic Methods in the Differentiation of Heart Murmurs in Children
title Evaluation of Diagnostic Methods in the Differentiation of Heart Murmurs in Children
title_full Evaluation of Diagnostic Methods in the Differentiation of Heart Murmurs in Children
title_fullStr Evaluation of Diagnostic Methods in the Differentiation of Heart Murmurs in Children
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Diagnostic Methods in the Differentiation of Heart Murmurs in Children
title_short Evaluation of Diagnostic Methods in the Differentiation of Heart Murmurs in Children
title_sort evaluation of diagnostic methods in the differentiation of heart murmurs in children
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4851509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27147798
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.94-98
work_keys_str_mv AT begiczijo evaluationofdiagnosticmethodsinthedifferentiationofheartmurmursinchildren
AT dinarevicsenkamesihovic evaluationofdiagnosticmethodsinthedifferentiationofheartmurmursinchildren
AT pestosenad evaluationofdiagnosticmethodsinthedifferentiationofheartmurmursinchildren
AT begicedin evaluationofdiagnosticmethodsinthedifferentiationofheartmurmursinchildren
AT dobracaamra evaluationofdiagnosticmethodsinthedifferentiationofheartmurmursinchildren
AT masicizet evaluationofdiagnosticmethodsinthedifferentiationofheartmurmursinchildren