Cargando…
The developmental trajectory of attentional orienting to socio-biological cues
It has been proposed that the orienting of attention in the same direction as another’s point of gaze relies on innate brain mechanisms which are present from birth, but direct evidence relating to the influence of eye gaze cues on attentional orienting in young children is limited. In two experimen...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4851695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27060906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4627-3 |
_version_ | 1782429846223192064 |
---|---|
author | Gregory, Nicola Jean Hermens, Frouke Facey, Rebecca Hodgson, Timothy L. |
author_facet | Gregory, Nicola Jean Hermens, Frouke Facey, Rebecca Hodgson, Timothy L. |
author_sort | Gregory, Nicola Jean |
collection | PubMed |
description | It has been proposed that the orienting of attention in the same direction as another’s point of gaze relies on innate brain mechanisms which are present from birth, but direct evidence relating to the influence of eye gaze cues on attentional orienting in young children is limited. In two experiments, 137 children aged 3–10 years old performed an adapted pro-saccade task with centrally presented uninformative eye gaze, finger pointing and arrow pre-cues which were either congruent or incongruent with the direction of target presentations. When the central cue overlapped with presentation of the peripheral target (Experiment 1), children up to 5 years old had difficulty disengaging fixation from central fixation in order to saccade to the target. This effect was found to be particularly marked for eye gaze cues. When central cues were extinguished simultaneously with peripheral target onset (Experiment 2), this effect was greatly reduced. In both experiments finger pointing cues (image of pointing index finger presented at fixation) exerted a strong influence on saccade reaction time to the peripheral stimulus for the youngest group of children (<5 years). Overall the results suggest that although young children are strongly engaged by centrally presented eye gaze cues, the directional influence of such cues on overt attentional orienting is only present in older children, meaning that the effect is unlikely to be dependent upon an innate brain module. Instead, the results are consistent with the existence of stimulus–response associations which develop with age and environmental experience. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4851695 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48516952016-05-19 The developmental trajectory of attentional orienting to socio-biological cues Gregory, Nicola Jean Hermens, Frouke Facey, Rebecca Hodgson, Timothy L. Exp Brain Res Research Article It has been proposed that the orienting of attention in the same direction as another’s point of gaze relies on innate brain mechanisms which are present from birth, but direct evidence relating to the influence of eye gaze cues on attentional orienting in young children is limited. In two experiments, 137 children aged 3–10 years old performed an adapted pro-saccade task with centrally presented uninformative eye gaze, finger pointing and arrow pre-cues which were either congruent or incongruent with the direction of target presentations. When the central cue overlapped with presentation of the peripheral target (Experiment 1), children up to 5 years old had difficulty disengaging fixation from central fixation in order to saccade to the target. This effect was found to be particularly marked for eye gaze cues. When central cues were extinguished simultaneously with peripheral target onset (Experiment 2), this effect was greatly reduced. In both experiments finger pointing cues (image of pointing index finger presented at fixation) exerted a strong influence on saccade reaction time to the peripheral stimulus for the youngest group of children (<5 years). Overall the results suggest that although young children are strongly engaged by centrally presented eye gaze cues, the directional influence of such cues on overt attentional orienting is only present in older children, meaning that the effect is unlikely to be dependent upon an innate brain module. Instead, the results are consistent with the existence of stimulus–response associations which develop with age and environmental experience. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-04-09 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4851695/ /pubmed/27060906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4627-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gregory, Nicola Jean Hermens, Frouke Facey, Rebecca Hodgson, Timothy L. The developmental trajectory of attentional orienting to socio-biological cues |
title | The developmental trajectory of attentional orienting to socio-biological cues |
title_full | The developmental trajectory of attentional orienting to socio-biological cues |
title_fullStr | The developmental trajectory of attentional orienting to socio-biological cues |
title_full_unstemmed | The developmental trajectory of attentional orienting to socio-biological cues |
title_short | The developmental trajectory of attentional orienting to socio-biological cues |
title_sort | developmental trajectory of attentional orienting to socio-biological cues |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4851695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27060906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4627-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gregorynicolajean thedevelopmentaltrajectoryofattentionalorientingtosociobiologicalcues AT hermensfrouke thedevelopmentaltrajectoryofattentionalorientingtosociobiologicalcues AT faceyrebecca thedevelopmentaltrajectoryofattentionalorientingtosociobiologicalcues AT hodgsontimothyl thedevelopmentaltrajectoryofattentionalorientingtosociobiologicalcues AT gregorynicolajean developmentaltrajectoryofattentionalorientingtosociobiologicalcues AT hermensfrouke developmentaltrajectoryofattentionalorientingtosociobiologicalcues AT faceyrebecca developmentaltrajectoryofattentionalorientingtosociobiologicalcues AT hodgsontimothyl developmentaltrajectoryofattentionalorientingtosociobiologicalcues |