Cargando…
An assessment of auditory-guided locomotion in an obstacle circumvention task
This study investigated how effectively audition can be used to guide navigation around an obstacle. Ten blindfolded normally sighted participants navigated around a 0.6 × 2 m obstacle while producing self-generated mouth click sounds. Objective movement performance was measured using a Vicon motion...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4851710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26879767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4567-y |
_version_ | 1782429849167593472 |
---|---|
author | Kolarik, Andrew J. Scarfe, Amy C. Moore, Brian C. J. Pardhan, Shahina |
author_facet | Kolarik, Andrew J. Scarfe, Amy C. Moore, Brian C. J. Pardhan, Shahina |
author_sort | Kolarik, Andrew J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study investigated how effectively audition can be used to guide navigation around an obstacle. Ten blindfolded normally sighted participants navigated around a 0.6 × 2 m obstacle while producing self-generated mouth click sounds. Objective movement performance was measured using a Vicon motion capture system. Performance with full vision without generating sound was used as a baseline for comparison. The obstacle’s location was varied randomly from trial to trial: it was either straight ahead or 25 cm to the left or right relative to the participant. Although audition provided sufficient information to detect the obstacle and guide participants around it without collision in the majority of trials, buffer space (clearance between the shoulder and obstacle), overall movement times, and number of velocity corrections were significantly (p < 0.05) greater with auditory guidance than visual guidance. Collisions sometime occurred under auditory guidance, suggesting that audition did not always provide an accurate estimate of the space between the participant and obstacle. Unlike visual guidance, participants did not always walk around the side that afforded the most space during auditory guidance. Mean buffer space was 1.8 times higher under auditory than under visual guidance. Results suggest that sound can be used to generate buffer space when vision is unavailable, allowing navigation around an obstacle without collision in the majority of trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4851710 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48517102016-05-19 An assessment of auditory-guided locomotion in an obstacle circumvention task Kolarik, Andrew J. Scarfe, Amy C. Moore, Brian C. J. Pardhan, Shahina Exp Brain Res Research Article This study investigated how effectively audition can be used to guide navigation around an obstacle. Ten blindfolded normally sighted participants navigated around a 0.6 × 2 m obstacle while producing self-generated mouth click sounds. Objective movement performance was measured using a Vicon motion capture system. Performance with full vision without generating sound was used as a baseline for comparison. The obstacle’s location was varied randomly from trial to trial: it was either straight ahead or 25 cm to the left or right relative to the participant. Although audition provided sufficient information to detect the obstacle and guide participants around it without collision in the majority of trials, buffer space (clearance between the shoulder and obstacle), overall movement times, and number of velocity corrections were significantly (p < 0.05) greater with auditory guidance than visual guidance. Collisions sometime occurred under auditory guidance, suggesting that audition did not always provide an accurate estimate of the space between the participant and obstacle. Unlike visual guidance, participants did not always walk around the side that afforded the most space during auditory guidance. Mean buffer space was 1.8 times higher under auditory than under visual guidance. Results suggest that sound can be used to generate buffer space when vision is unavailable, allowing navigation around an obstacle without collision in the majority of trials. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-02-15 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4851710/ /pubmed/26879767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4567-y Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kolarik, Andrew J. Scarfe, Amy C. Moore, Brian C. J. Pardhan, Shahina An assessment of auditory-guided locomotion in an obstacle circumvention task |
title | An assessment of auditory-guided locomotion in an obstacle circumvention task |
title_full | An assessment of auditory-guided locomotion in an obstacle circumvention task |
title_fullStr | An assessment of auditory-guided locomotion in an obstacle circumvention task |
title_full_unstemmed | An assessment of auditory-guided locomotion in an obstacle circumvention task |
title_short | An assessment of auditory-guided locomotion in an obstacle circumvention task |
title_sort | assessment of auditory-guided locomotion in an obstacle circumvention task |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4851710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26879767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4567-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kolarikandrewj anassessmentofauditoryguidedlocomotioninanobstaclecircumventiontask AT scarfeamyc anassessmentofauditoryguidedlocomotioninanobstaclecircumventiontask AT moorebriancj anassessmentofauditoryguidedlocomotioninanobstaclecircumventiontask AT pardhanshahina anassessmentofauditoryguidedlocomotioninanobstaclecircumventiontask AT kolarikandrewj assessmentofauditoryguidedlocomotioninanobstaclecircumventiontask AT scarfeamyc assessmentofauditoryguidedlocomotioninanobstaclecircumventiontask AT moorebriancj assessmentofauditoryguidedlocomotioninanobstaclecircumventiontask AT pardhanshahina assessmentofauditoryguidedlocomotioninanobstaclecircumventiontask |