Cargando…

An assessment of auditory-guided locomotion in an obstacle circumvention task

This study investigated how effectively audition can be used to guide navigation around an obstacle. Ten blindfolded normally sighted participants navigated around a 0.6 × 2 m obstacle while producing self-generated mouth click sounds. Objective movement performance was measured using a Vicon motion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kolarik, Andrew J., Scarfe, Amy C., Moore, Brian C. J., Pardhan, Shahina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4851710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26879767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4567-y
_version_ 1782429849167593472
author Kolarik, Andrew J.
Scarfe, Amy C.
Moore, Brian C. J.
Pardhan, Shahina
author_facet Kolarik, Andrew J.
Scarfe, Amy C.
Moore, Brian C. J.
Pardhan, Shahina
author_sort Kolarik, Andrew J.
collection PubMed
description This study investigated how effectively audition can be used to guide navigation around an obstacle. Ten blindfolded normally sighted participants navigated around a 0.6 × 2 m obstacle while producing self-generated mouth click sounds. Objective movement performance was measured using a Vicon motion capture system. Performance with full vision without generating sound was used as a baseline for comparison. The obstacle’s location was varied randomly from trial to trial: it was either straight ahead or 25 cm to the left or right relative to the participant. Although audition provided sufficient information to detect the obstacle and guide participants around it without collision in the majority of trials, buffer space (clearance between the shoulder and obstacle), overall movement times, and number of velocity corrections were significantly (p < 0.05) greater with auditory guidance than visual guidance. Collisions sometime occurred under auditory guidance, suggesting that audition did not always provide an accurate estimate of the space between the participant and obstacle. Unlike visual guidance, participants did not always walk around the side that afforded the most space during auditory guidance. Mean buffer space was 1.8 times higher under auditory than under visual guidance. Results suggest that sound can be used to generate buffer space when vision is unavailable, allowing navigation around an obstacle without collision in the majority of trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4851710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48517102016-05-19 An assessment of auditory-guided locomotion in an obstacle circumvention task Kolarik, Andrew J. Scarfe, Amy C. Moore, Brian C. J. Pardhan, Shahina Exp Brain Res Research Article This study investigated how effectively audition can be used to guide navigation around an obstacle. Ten blindfolded normally sighted participants navigated around a 0.6 × 2 m obstacle while producing self-generated mouth click sounds. Objective movement performance was measured using a Vicon motion capture system. Performance with full vision without generating sound was used as a baseline for comparison. The obstacle’s location was varied randomly from trial to trial: it was either straight ahead or 25 cm to the left or right relative to the participant. Although audition provided sufficient information to detect the obstacle and guide participants around it without collision in the majority of trials, buffer space (clearance between the shoulder and obstacle), overall movement times, and number of velocity corrections were significantly (p < 0.05) greater with auditory guidance than visual guidance. Collisions sometime occurred under auditory guidance, suggesting that audition did not always provide an accurate estimate of the space between the participant and obstacle. Unlike visual guidance, participants did not always walk around the side that afforded the most space during auditory guidance. Mean buffer space was 1.8 times higher under auditory than under visual guidance. Results suggest that sound can be used to generate buffer space when vision is unavailable, allowing navigation around an obstacle without collision in the majority of trials. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-02-15 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4851710/ /pubmed/26879767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4567-y Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kolarik, Andrew J.
Scarfe, Amy C.
Moore, Brian C. J.
Pardhan, Shahina
An assessment of auditory-guided locomotion in an obstacle circumvention task
title An assessment of auditory-guided locomotion in an obstacle circumvention task
title_full An assessment of auditory-guided locomotion in an obstacle circumvention task
title_fullStr An assessment of auditory-guided locomotion in an obstacle circumvention task
title_full_unstemmed An assessment of auditory-guided locomotion in an obstacle circumvention task
title_short An assessment of auditory-guided locomotion in an obstacle circumvention task
title_sort assessment of auditory-guided locomotion in an obstacle circumvention task
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4851710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26879767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4567-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kolarikandrewj anassessmentofauditoryguidedlocomotioninanobstaclecircumventiontask
AT scarfeamyc anassessmentofauditoryguidedlocomotioninanobstaclecircumventiontask
AT moorebriancj anassessmentofauditoryguidedlocomotioninanobstaclecircumventiontask
AT pardhanshahina anassessmentofauditoryguidedlocomotioninanobstaclecircumventiontask
AT kolarikandrewj assessmentofauditoryguidedlocomotioninanobstaclecircumventiontask
AT scarfeamyc assessmentofauditoryguidedlocomotioninanobstaclecircumventiontask
AT moorebriancj assessmentofauditoryguidedlocomotioninanobstaclecircumventiontask
AT pardhanshahina assessmentofauditoryguidedlocomotioninanobstaclecircumventiontask