Cargando…

Exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science courses in the reformed medical curriculum iMED: a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: Heterogeneous basic science knowledge of medical students is an important challenge for medical education. In this study, the authors aimed at exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science (ISS) courses as a novel approach to address this challenge and to promote learning...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eisenbarth, Sophie, Tilling, Thomas, Lueerss, Eva, Meyer, Jelka, Sehner, Susanne, Guse, Andreas H., Guse (nee Kurré), Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4851779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27129494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0646-9
_version_ 1782429859528572928
author Eisenbarth, Sophie
Tilling, Thomas
Lueerss, Eva
Meyer, Jelka
Sehner, Susanne
Guse, Andreas H.
Guse (nee Kurré), Jennifer
author_facet Eisenbarth, Sophie
Tilling, Thomas
Lueerss, Eva
Meyer, Jelka
Sehner, Susanne
Guse, Andreas H.
Guse (nee Kurré), Jennifer
author_sort Eisenbarth, Sophie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Heterogeneous basic science knowledge of medical students is an important challenge for medical education. In this study, the authors aimed at exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science (ISS) courses as a novel approach to address this challenge and to promote learning basic science concepts in medical education. ISS courses were embedded in a reformed medical curriculum. METHODS: The authors used a mixed methods approach including four focus groups involving ISS course lecturers and students (two each), and five surveys of one student cohort covering the results of regular student evaluations including the ISS courses across one study year. They conducted their study at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf between December 2013 and July 2014. RESULTS: Fourteen first-year medical students and thirteen ISS course lecturers participated in the focus groups. The authors identified several themes focused on the temporal integration of ISS courses into the medical curriculum, the integration of ISS course contents into core curriculum contents, the value and role of ISS courses, and the courses’ setting and atmosphere. The integrated course concept was positively accepted by both groups, with participants suggesting that it promotes retention of basic science knowledge. Values and roles identified by focus group participants included promotion of basic understanding of science concepts, integration of foundational and applied learning, and maximization of students’ engagement and motivation. Building close links between ISS course contents and the core curriculum appeared to be crucial. Survey results confirmed qualitative findings regarding students’ satisfaction, with some courses still requiring optimization. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of supportive basic science courses, traditionally rather part of premedical education, into the medical curriculum appears to be a feasible strategy to improve medical students’ understanding of basic science concepts and to increase their motivation and engagement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0646-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4851779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48517792016-05-01 Exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science courses in the reformed medical curriculum iMED: a mixed methods study Eisenbarth, Sophie Tilling, Thomas Lueerss, Eva Meyer, Jelka Sehner, Susanne Guse, Andreas H. Guse (nee Kurré), Jennifer BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Heterogeneous basic science knowledge of medical students is an important challenge for medical education. In this study, the authors aimed at exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science (ISS) courses as a novel approach to address this challenge and to promote learning basic science concepts in medical education. ISS courses were embedded in a reformed medical curriculum. METHODS: The authors used a mixed methods approach including four focus groups involving ISS course lecturers and students (two each), and five surveys of one student cohort covering the results of regular student evaluations including the ISS courses across one study year. They conducted their study at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf between December 2013 and July 2014. RESULTS: Fourteen first-year medical students and thirteen ISS course lecturers participated in the focus groups. The authors identified several themes focused on the temporal integration of ISS courses into the medical curriculum, the integration of ISS course contents into core curriculum contents, the value and role of ISS courses, and the courses’ setting and atmosphere. The integrated course concept was positively accepted by both groups, with participants suggesting that it promotes retention of basic science knowledge. Values and roles identified by focus group participants included promotion of basic understanding of science concepts, integration of foundational and applied learning, and maximization of students’ engagement and motivation. Building close links between ISS course contents and the core curriculum appeared to be crucial. Survey results confirmed qualitative findings regarding students’ satisfaction, with some courses still requiring optimization. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of supportive basic science courses, traditionally rather part of premedical education, into the medical curriculum appears to be a feasible strategy to improve medical students’ understanding of basic science concepts and to increase their motivation and engagement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0646-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4851779/ /pubmed/27129494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0646-9 Text en © Eisenbarth et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Eisenbarth, Sophie
Tilling, Thomas
Lueerss, Eva
Meyer, Jelka
Sehner, Susanne
Guse, Andreas H.
Guse (nee Kurré), Jennifer
Exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science courses in the reformed medical curriculum iMED: a mixed methods study
title Exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science courses in the reformed medical curriculum iMED: a mixed methods study
title_full Exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science courses in the reformed medical curriculum iMED: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science courses in the reformed medical curriculum iMED: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science courses in the reformed medical curriculum iMED: a mixed methods study
title_short Exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science courses in the reformed medical curriculum iMED: a mixed methods study
title_sort exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science courses in the reformed medical curriculum imed: a mixed methods study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4851779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27129494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0646-9
work_keys_str_mv AT eisenbarthsophie exploringthevalueandroleofintegratedsupportivesciencecoursesinthereformedmedicalcurriculumimedamixedmethodsstudy
AT tillingthomas exploringthevalueandroleofintegratedsupportivesciencecoursesinthereformedmedicalcurriculumimedamixedmethodsstudy
AT lueersseva exploringthevalueandroleofintegratedsupportivesciencecoursesinthereformedmedicalcurriculumimedamixedmethodsstudy
AT meyerjelka exploringthevalueandroleofintegratedsupportivesciencecoursesinthereformedmedicalcurriculumimedamixedmethodsstudy
AT sehnersusanne exploringthevalueandroleofintegratedsupportivesciencecoursesinthereformedmedicalcurriculumimedamixedmethodsstudy
AT guseandreash exploringthevalueandroleofintegratedsupportivesciencecoursesinthereformedmedicalcurriculumimedamixedmethodsstudy
AT guseneekurrejennifer exploringthevalueandroleofintegratedsupportivesciencecoursesinthereformedmedicalcurriculumimedamixedmethodsstudy