Cargando…
Exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science courses in the reformed medical curriculum iMED: a mixed methods study
BACKGROUND: Heterogeneous basic science knowledge of medical students is an important challenge for medical education. In this study, the authors aimed at exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science (ISS) courses as a novel approach to address this challenge and to promote learning...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4851779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27129494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0646-9 |
_version_ | 1782429859528572928 |
---|---|
author | Eisenbarth, Sophie Tilling, Thomas Lueerss, Eva Meyer, Jelka Sehner, Susanne Guse, Andreas H. Guse (nee Kurré), Jennifer |
author_facet | Eisenbarth, Sophie Tilling, Thomas Lueerss, Eva Meyer, Jelka Sehner, Susanne Guse, Andreas H. Guse (nee Kurré), Jennifer |
author_sort | Eisenbarth, Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Heterogeneous basic science knowledge of medical students is an important challenge for medical education. In this study, the authors aimed at exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science (ISS) courses as a novel approach to address this challenge and to promote learning basic science concepts in medical education. ISS courses were embedded in a reformed medical curriculum. METHODS: The authors used a mixed methods approach including four focus groups involving ISS course lecturers and students (two each), and five surveys of one student cohort covering the results of regular student evaluations including the ISS courses across one study year. They conducted their study at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf between December 2013 and July 2014. RESULTS: Fourteen first-year medical students and thirteen ISS course lecturers participated in the focus groups. The authors identified several themes focused on the temporal integration of ISS courses into the medical curriculum, the integration of ISS course contents into core curriculum contents, the value and role of ISS courses, and the courses’ setting and atmosphere. The integrated course concept was positively accepted by both groups, with participants suggesting that it promotes retention of basic science knowledge. Values and roles identified by focus group participants included promotion of basic understanding of science concepts, integration of foundational and applied learning, and maximization of students’ engagement and motivation. Building close links between ISS course contents and the core curriculum appeared to be crucial. Survey results confirmed qualitative findings regarding students’ satisfaction, with some courses still requiring optimization. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of supportive basic science courses, traditionally rather part of premedical education, into the medical curriculum appears to be a feasible strategy to improve medical students’ understanding of basic science concepts and to increase their motivation and engagement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0646-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4851779 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48517792016-05-01 Exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science courses in the reformed medical curriculum iMED: a mixed methods study Eisenbarth, Sophie Tilling, Thomas Lueerss, Eva Meyer, Jelka Sehner, Susanne Guse, Andreas H. Guse (nee Kurré), Jennifer BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Heterogeneous basic science knowledge of medical students is an important challenge for medical education. In this study, the authors aimed at exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science (ISS) courses as a novel approach to address this challenge and to promote learning basic science concepts in medical education. ISS courses were embedded in a reformed medical curriculum. METHODS: The authors used a mixed methods approach including four focus groups involving ISS course lecturers and students (two each), and five surveys of one student cohort covering the results of regular student evaluations including the ISS courses across one study year. They conducted their study at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf between December 2013 and July 2014. RESULTS: Fourteen first-year medical students and thirteen ISS course lecturers participated in the focus groups. The authors identified several themes focused on the temporal integration of ISS courses into the medical curriculum, the integration of ISS course contents into core curriculum contents, the value and role of ISS courses, and the courses’ setting and atmosphere. The integrated course concept was positively accepted by both groups, with participants suggesting that it promotes retention of basic science knowledge. Values and roles identified by focus group participants included promotion of basic understanding of science concepts, integration of foundational and applied learning, and maximization of students’ engagement and motivation. Building close links between ISS course contents and the core curriculum appeared to be crucial. Survey results confirmed qualitative findings regarding students’ satisfaction, with some courses still requiring optimization. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of supportive basic science courses, traditionally rather part of premedical education, into the medical curriculum appears to be a feasible strategy to improve medical students’ understanding of basic science concepts and to increase their motivation and engagement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0646-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4851779/ /pubmed/27129494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0646-9 Text en © Eisenbarth et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Eisenbarth, Sophie Tilling, Thomas Lueerss, Eva Meyer, Jelka Sehner, Susanne Guse, Andreas H. Guse (nee Kurré), Jennifer Exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science courses in the reformed medical curriculum iMED: a mixed methods study |
title | Exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science courses in the reformed medical curriculum iMED: a mixed methods study |
title_full | Exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science courses in the reformed medical curriculum iMED: a mixed methods study |
title_fullStr | Exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science courses in the reformed medical curriculum iMED: a mixed methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science courses in the reformed medical curriculum iMED: a mixed methods study |
title_short | Exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science courses in the reformed medical curriculum iMED: a mixed methods study |
title_sort | exploring the value and role of integrated supportive science courses in the reformed medical curriculum imed: a mixed methods study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4851779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27129494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0646-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eisenbarthsophie exploringthevalueandroleofintegratedsupportivesciencecoursesinthereformedmedicalcurriculumimedamixedmethodsstudy AT tillingthomas exploringthevalueandroleofintegratedsupportivesciencecoursesinthereformedmedicalcurriculumimedamixedmethodsstudy AT lueersseva exploringthevalueandroleofintegratedsupportivesciencecoursesinthereformedmedicalcurriculumimedamixedmethodsstudy AT meyerjelka exploringthevalueandroleofintegratedsupportivesciencecoursesinthereformedmedicalcurriculumimedamixedmethodsstudy AT sehnersusanne exploringthevalueandroleofintegratedsupportivesciencecoursesinthereformedmedicalcurriculumimedamixedmethodsstudy AT guseandreash exploringthevalueandroleofintegratedsupportivesciencecoursesinthereformedmedicalcurriculumimedamixedmethodsstudy AT guseneekurrejennifer exploringthevalueandroleofintegratedsupportivesciencecoursesinthereformedmedicalcurriculumimedamixedmethodsstudy |