Cargando…
Effects of Three Feeding Systems on Production Performance, Rumen Fermentation and Rumen Digesta Particle Structure of Beef Cattle
The effects of three different feeding systems on beef cattle production performance, rumen fermentation, and rumen digesta particle structure were investigated by using 18 Limousin (steers) with a similar body weight (575±10 kg) in a 80-d experiment. The animals were equally and randomly divided in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4852227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26954181 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0445 |
_version_ | 1782429905264312320 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Y. F. Sun, F. F. Wan, F. C. Zhao, H. B. Liu, X. M. You, W. Cheng, H. J. Liu, G. F. Tan, X. W. Song, E. L. |
author_facet | Liu, Y. F. Sun, F. F. Wan, F. C. Zhao, H. B. Liu, X. M. You, W. Cheng, H. J. Liu, G. F. Tan, X. W. Song, E. L. |
author_sort | Liu, Y. F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The effects of three different feeding systems on beef cattle production performance, rumen fermentation, and rumen digesta particle structure were investigated by using 18 Limousin (steers) with a similar body weight (575±10 kg) in a 80-d experiment. The animals were equally and randomly divided into three treatment groups, namely, total mixed ration group (cattle fed TMR), SI1 group (cattle fed concentrate firstly then roughage), and SI2 group (cattle fed roughage firstly then concentrate). The results showed that the average daily gain was significantly higher in cattle receiving TMR than in those receiving SI1 and SI2 (p<0.05). Consumption per kg weight gain of concentrate, silage, and combined net energy (NEmf) were significantly decreased when cattle received TMR, unlike when they received SI1 and SI2 (p<0.05), indicating that the feed efficiency of TMR was the highest. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) was significantly decreased when cattle received TMR compared with that in cattle receiving SI1 (p<0.05), whereas there was no difference compared with that in cattle receiving SI2. Ammonia nitrogen concentration was significantly lower in cattle receiving TMR than in those receiving SI1 and SI2 (p<0.05). The rumen area of cattle that received TMR was significantly larger than that of cattle receiving SI1 (p<0.05), but there was no difference compared with that of cattle receiving SI2. Although there was no significant difference among the three feeding systems in rumen digesta particle distribution, the TMR group trended to have fewer large- and medium-sized particles and more small-sized particles than those in the SI1 and SI2 groups. In conclusion, cattle with dietary TMR showed increased weight gain and ruminal development and decreased BUN. This indicated that TMR feeding was more conducive toward improving the production performance and rumen fermentation of beef cattle. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4852227 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48522272016-05-04 Effects of Three Feeding Systems on Production Performance, Rumen Fermentation and Rumen Digesta Particle Structure of Beef Cattle Liu, Y. F. Sun, F. F. Wan, F. C. Zhao, H. B. Liu, X. M. You, W. Cheng, H. J. Liu, G. F. Tan, X. W. Song, E. L. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Article The effects of three different feeding systems on beef cattle production performance, rumen fermentation, and rumen digesta particle structure were investigated by using 18 Limousin (steers) with a similar body weight (575±10 kg) in a 80-d experiment. The animals were equally and randomly divided into three treatment groups, namely, total mixed ration group (cattle fed TMR), SI1 group (cattle fed concentrate firstly then roughage), and SI2 group (cattle fed roughage firstly then concentrate). The results showed that the average daily gain was significantly higher in cattle receiving TMR than in those receiving SI1 and SI2 (p<0.05). Consumption per kg weight gain of concentrate, silage, and combined net energy (NEmf) were significantly decreased when cattle received TMR, unlike when they received SI1 and SI2 (p<0.05), indicating that the feed efficiency of TMR was the highest. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) was significantly decreased when cattle received TMR compared with that in cattle receiving SI1 (p<0.05), whereas there was no difference compared with that in cattle receiving SI2. Ammonia nitrogen concentration was significantly lower in cattle receiving TMR than in those receiving SI1 and SI2 (p<0.05). The rumen area of cattle that received TMR was significantly larger than that of cattle receiving SI1 (p<0.05), but there was no difference compared with that of cattle receiving SI2. Although there was no significant difference among the three feeding systems in rumen digesta particle distribution, the TMR group trended to have fewer large- and medium-sized particles and more small-sized particles than those in the SI1 and SI2 groups. In conclusion, cattle with dietary TMR showed increased weight gain and ruminal development and decreased BUN. This indicated that TMR feeding was more conducive toward improving the production performance and rumen fermentation of beef cattle. Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2016-05 2015-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4852227/ /pubmed/26954181 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0445 Text en Copyright © 2016 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Liu, Y. F. Sun, F. F. Wan, F. C. Zhao, H. B. Liu, X. M. You, W. Cheng, H. J. Liu, G. F. Tan, X. W. Song, E. L. Effects of Three Feeding Systems on Production Performance, Rumen Fermentation and Rumen Digesta Particle Structure of Beef Cattle |
title | Effects of Three Feeding Systems on Production Performance, Rumen Fermentation and Rumen Digesta Particle Structure of Beef Cattle |
title_full | Effects of Three Feeding Systems on Production Performance, Rumen Fermentation and Rumen Digesta Particle Structure of Beef Cattle |
title_fullStr | Effects of Three Feeding Systems on Production Performance, Rumen Fermentation and Rumen Digesta Particle Structure of Beef Cattle |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Three Feeding Systems on Production Performance, Rumen Fermentation and Rumen Digesta Particle Structure of Beef Cattle |
title_short | Effects of Three Feeding Systems on Production Performance, Rumen Fermentation and Rumen Digesta Particle Structure of Beef Cattle |
title_sort | effects of three feeding systems on production performance, rumen fermentation and rumen digesta particle structure of beef cattle |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4852227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26954181 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0445 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuyf effectsofthreefeedingsystemsonproductionperformancerumenfermentationandrumendigestaparticlestructureofbeefcattle AT sunff effectsofthreefeedingsystemsonproductionperformancerumenfermentationandrumendigestaparticlestructureofbeefcattle AT wanfc effectsofthreefeedingsystemsonproductionperformancerumenfermentationandrumendigestaparticlestructureofbeefcattle AT zhaohb effectsofthreefeedingsystemsonproductionperformancerumenfermentationandrumendigestaparticlestructureofbeefcattle AT liuxm effectsofthreefeedingsystemsonproductionperformancerumenfermentationandrumendigestaparticlestructureofbeefcattle AT youw effectsofthreefeedingsystemsonproductionperformancerumenfermentationandrumendigestaparticlestructureofbeefcattle AT chenghj effectsofthreefeedingsystemsonproductionperformancerumenfermentationandrumendigestaparticlestructureofbeefcattle AT liugf effectsofthreefeedingsystemsonproductionperformancerumenfermentationandrumendigestaparticlestructureofbeefcattle AT tanxw effectsofthreefeedingsystemsonproductionperformancerumenfermentationandrumendigestaparticlestructureofbeefcattle AT songel effectsofthreefeedingsystemsonproductionperformancerumenfermentationandrumendigestaparticlestructureofbeefcattle |