Cargando…
Arterial blood pressure differences between AutoPulse™ and Lucas2™during mechanic cardiopulmonary resuscitation
We present a 39-year-old patient under constant mechanical CPR with an arterial line in place. The use of AutoPulse™ resulted in higher arterial pressures than the use of LUCAS2™.
Autores principales: | Frey, Manuel, Lötscher, Stefan, Theiler, Lorenz, Albrecht, Roland |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4852464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27138976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0253-0 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Mechanische CPR (AutoPulse™) in Bauchlage, machbar?
por: Pietsch, U., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Safety of mechanical chest compression devices AutoPulse and LUCAS in cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial for non-inferiority
por: Koster, Rudolph W, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Efficacy of AutoPulse for Mechanical Chest Compression in Patients with Shock-Resistant Ventricular Fibrillation
por: Gorący, Jarosław, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Comparison of in-hospital use of mechanical chest compression devices for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: AUTOPULSE vs LUCAS
por: Kim, Hyun Tae, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Clinical evaluation of the AutoPulse automated chest compression device for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the northern district of Shanghai, China
por: Gao, Chengjin, et al.
Publicado: (2016)