Cargando…

Future Climate CO(2) Levels Mitigate Stress Impact on Plants: Increased Defense or Decreased Challenge?

Elevated atmospheric CO(2) can stimulate plant growth by providing additional C (fertilization effect), and is observed to mitigate abiotic stress impact. Although, the mechanisms underlying the stress mitigating effect are not yet clear, increased antioxidant defenses, have been held primarily resp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: AbdElgawad, Hamada, Zinta, Gaurav, Beemster, Gerrit T. S., Janssens, Ivan A., Asard, Han
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4852726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27200030
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00556
_version_ 1782429984503103488
author AbdElgawad, Hamada
Zinta, Gaurav
Beemster, Gerrit T. S.
Janssens, Ivan A.
Asard, Han
author_facet AbdElgawad, Hamada
Zinta, Gaurav
Beemster, Gerrit T. S.
Janssens, Ivan A.
Asard, Han
author_sort AbdElgawad, Hamada
collection PubMed
description Elevated atmospheric CO(2) can stimulate plant growth by providing additional C (fertilization effect), and is observed to mitigate abiotic stress impact. Although, the mechanisms underlying the stress mitigating effect are not yet clear, increased antioxidant defenses, have been held primarily responsible (antioxidant hypothesis). A systematic literature analysis, including “all” papers [Web of Science (WoS)-cited], addressing elevated CO(2) effects on abiotic stress responses and antioxidants (105 papers), confirms the frequent occurrence of the stress mitigation effect. However, it also demonstrates that, in stress conditions, elevated CO(2) is reported to increase antioxidants, only in about 22% of the observations (e.g., for polyphenols, peroxidases, superoxide dismutase, monodehydroascorbate reductase). In most observations, under stress and elevated CO(2) the levels of key antioxidants and antioxidant enzymes are reported to remain unchanged (50%, e.g., ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, ascorbate), or even decreased (28%, e.g., glutathione peroxidase). Moreover, increases in antioxidants are not specific for a species group, growth facility, or stress type. It seems therefore unlikely that increased antioxidant defense is the major mechanism underlying CO(2)-mediated stress impact mitigation. Alternative processes, probably decreasing the oxidative challenge by reducing ROS production (e.g., photorespiration), are therefore likely to play important roles in elevated CO(2) (relaxation hypothesis). Such parameters are however rarely investigated in connection with abiotic stress relief. Understanding the effect of elevated CO(2) on plant growth and stress responses is imperative to understand the impact of climate changes on plant productivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4852726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48527262016-05-19 Future Climate CO(2) Levels Mitigate Stress Impact on Plants: Increased Defense or Decreased Challenge? AbdElgawad, Hamada Zinta, Gaurav Beemster, Gerrit T. S. Janssens, Ivan A. Asard, Han Front Plant Sci Plant Science Elevated atmospheric CO(2) can stimulate plant growth by providing additional C (fertilization effect), and is observed to mitigate abiotic stress impact. Although, the mechanisms underlying the stress mitigating effect are not yet clear, increased antioxidant defenses, have been held primarily responsible (antioxidant hypothesis). A systematic literature analysis, including “all” papers [Web of Science (WoS)-cited], addressing elevated CO(2) effects on abiotic stress responses and antioxidants (105 papers), confirms the frequent occurrence of the stress mitigation effect. However, it also demonstrates that, in stress conditions, elevated CO(2) is reported to increase antioxidants, only in about 22% of the observations (e.g., for polyphenols, peroxidases, superoxide dismutase, monodehydroascorbate reductase). In most observations, under stress and elevated CO(2) the levels of key antioxidants and antioxidant enzymes are reported to remain unchanged (50%, e.g., ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, ascorbate), or even decreased (28%, e.g., glutathione peroxidase). Moreover, increases in antioxidants are not specific for a species group, growth facility, or stress type. It seems therefore unlikely that increased antioxidant defense is the major mechanism underlying CO(2)-mediated stress impact mitigation. Alternative processes, probably decreasing the oxidative challenge by reducing ROS production (e.g., photorespiration), are therefore likely to play important roles in elevated CO(2) (relaxation hypothesis). Such parameters are however rarely investigated in connection with abiotic stress relief. Understanding the effect of elevated CO(2) on plant growth and stress responses is imperative to understand the impact of climate changes on plant productivity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4852726/ /pubmed/27200030 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00556 Text en Copyright © 2016 AbdElgawad, Zinta, Beemster, Janssens and Asard. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
AbdElgawad, Hamada
Zinta, Gaurav
Beemster, Gerrit T. S.
Janssens, Ivan A.
Asard, Han
Future Climate CO(2) Levels Mitigate Stress Impact on Plants: Increased Defense or Decreased Challenge?
title Future Climate CO(2) Levels Mitigate Stress Impact on Plants: Increased Defense or Decreased Challenge?
title_full Future Climate CO(2) Levels Mitigate Stress Impact on Plants: Increased Defense or Decreased Challenge?
title_fullStr Future Climate CO(2) Levels Mitigate Stress Impact on Plants: Increased Defense or Decreased Challenge?
title_full_unstemmed Future Climate CO(2) Levels Mitigate Stress Impact on Plants: Increased Defense or Decreased Challenge?
title_short Future Climate CO(2) Levels Mitigate Stress Impact on Plants: Increased Defense or Decreased Challenge?
title_sort future climate co(2) levels mitigate stress impact on plants: increased defense or decreased challenge?
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4852726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27200030
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00556
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelgawadhamada futureclimateco2levelsmitigatestressimpactonplantsincreaseddefenseordecreasedchallenge
AT zintagaurav futureclimateco2levelsmitigatestressimpactonplantsincreaseddefenseordecreasedchallenge
AT beemstergerritts futureclimateco2levelsmitigatestressimpactonplantsincreaseddefenseordecreasedchallenge
AT janssensivana futureclimateco2levelsmitigatestressimpactonplantsincreaseddefenseordecreasedchallenge
AT asardhan futureclimateco2levelsmitigatestressimpactonplantsincreaseddefenseordecreasedchallenge