Cargando…
Future Climate CO(2) Levels Mitigate Stress Impact on Plants: Increased Defense or Decreased Challenge?
Elevated atmospheric CO(2) can stimulate plant growth by providing additional C (fertilization effect), and is observed to mitigate abiotic stress impact. Although, the mechanisms underlying the stress mitigating effect are not yet clear, increased antioxidant defenses, have been held primarily resp...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4852726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27200030 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00556 |
_version_ | 1782429984503103488 |
---|---|
author | AbdElgawad, Hamada Zinta, Gaurav Beemster, Gerrit T. S. Janssens, Ivan A. Asard, Han |
author_facet | AbdElgawad, Hamada Zinta, Gaurav Beemster, Gerrit T. S. Janssens, Ivan A. Asard, Han |
author_sort | AbdElgawad, Hamada |
collection | PubMed |
description | Elevated atmospheric CO(2) can stimulate plant growth by providing additional C (fertilization effect), and is observed to mitigate abiotic stress impact. Although, the mechanisms underlying the stress mitigating effect are not yet clear, increased antioxidant defenses, have been held primarily responsible (antioxidant hypothesis). A systematic literature analysis, including “all” papers [Web of Science (WoS)-cited], addressing elevated CO(2) effects on abiotic stress responses and antioxidants (105 papers), confirms the frequent occurrence of the stress mitigation effect. However, it also demonstrates that, in stress conditions, elevated CO(2) is reported to increase antioxidants, only in about 22% of the observations (e.g., for polyphenols, peroxidases, superoxide dismutase, monodehydroascorbate reductase). In most observations, under stress and elevated CO(2) the levels of key antioxidants and antioxidant enzymes are reported to remain unchanged (50%, e.g., ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, ascorbate), or even decreased (28%, e.g., glutathione peroxidase). Moreover, increases in antioxidants are not specific for a species group, growth facility, or stress type. It seems therefore unlikely that increased antioxidant defense is the major mechanism underlying CO(2)-mediated stress impact mitigation. Alternative processes, probably decreasing the oxidative challenge by reducing ROS production (e.g., photorespiration), are therefore likely to play important roles in elevated CO(2) (relaxation hypothesis). Such parameters are however rarely investigated in connection with abiotic stress relief. Understanding the effect of elevated CO(2) on plant growth and stress responses is imperative to understand the impact of climate changes on plant productivity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4852726 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48527262016-05-19 Future Climate CO(2) Levels Mitigate Stress Impact on Plants: Increased Defense or Decreased Challenge? AbdElgawad, Hamada Zinta, Gaurav Beemster, Gerrit T. S. Janssens, Ivan A. Asard, Han Front Plant Sci Plant Science Elevated atmospheric CO(2) can stimulate plant growth by providing additional C (fertilization effect), and is observed to mitigate abiotic stress impact. Although, the mechanisms underlying the stress mitigating effect are not yet clear, increased antioxidant defenses, have been held primarily responsible (antioxidant hypothesis). A systematic literature analysis, including “all” papers [Web of Science (WoS)-cited], addressing elevated CO(2) effects on abiotic stress responses and antioxidants (105 papers), confirms the frequent occurrence of the stress mitigation effect. However, it also demonstrates that, in stress conditions, elevated CO(2) is reported to increase antioxidants, only in about 22% of the observations (e.g., for polyphenols, peroxidases, superoxide dismutase, monodehydroascorbate reductase). In most observations, under stress and elevated CO(2) the levels of key antioxidants and antioxidant enzymes are reported to remain unchanged (50%, e.g., ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, ascorbate), or even decreased (28%, e.g., glutathione peroxidase). Moreover, increases in antioxidants are not specific for a species group, growth facility, or stress type. It seems therefore unlikely that increased antioxidant defense is the major mechanism underlying CO(2)-mediated stress impact mitigation. Alternative processes, probably decreasing the oxidative challenge by reducing ROS production (e.g., photorespiration), are therefore likely to play important roles in elevated CO(2) (relaxation hypothesis). Such parameters are however rarely investigated in connection with abiotic stress relief. Understanding the effect of elevated CO(2) on plant growth and stress responses is imperative to understand the impact of climate changes on plant productivity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4852726/ /pubmed/27200030 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00556 Text en Copyright © 2016 AbdElgawad, Zinta, Beemster, Janssens and Asard. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science AbdElgawad, Hamada Zinta, Gaurav Beemster, Gerrit T. S. Janssens, Ivan A. Asard, Han Future Climate CO(2) Levels Mitigate Stress Impact on Plants: Increased Defense or Decreased Challenge? |
title | Future Climate CO(2) Levels Mitigate Stress Impact on Plants: Increased Defense or Decreased Challenge? |
title_full | Future Climate CO(2) Levels Mitigate Stress Impact on Plants: Increased Defense or Decreased Challenge? |
title_fullStr | Future Climate CO(2) Levels Mitigate Stress Impact on Plants: Increased Defense or Decreased Challenge? |
title_full_unstemmed | Future Climate CO(2) Levels Mitigate Stress Impact on Plants: Increased Defense or Decreased Challenge? |
title_short | Future Climate CO(2) Levels Mitigate Stress Impact on Plants: Increased Defense or Decreased Challenge? |
title_sort | future climate co(2) levels mitigate stress impact on plants: increased defense or decreased challenge? |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4852726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27200030 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00556 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdelgawadhamada futureclimateco2levelsmitigatestressimpactonplantsincreaseddefenseordecreasedchallenge AT zintagaurav futureclimateco2levelsmitigatestressimpactonplantsincreaseddefenseordecreasedchallenge AT beemstergerritts futureclimateco2levelsmitigatestressimpactonplantsincreaseddefenseordecreasedchallenge AT janssensivana futureclimateco2levelsmitigatestressimpactonplantsincreaseddefenseordecreasedchallenge AT asardhan futureclimateco2levelsmitigatestressimpactonplantsincreaseddefenseordecreasedchallenge |