Cargando…

Successes and Challenges in Implementation of Radon Control Activities in Iowa, 2010–2015

BACKGROUND: Radon gas has recently become more prominent in discussions of lung cancer prevention nationally and in Iowa. A review in 2013 of cancer plans in the National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program found that 42% of cancer plans, including Iowa’s, had terminology on radon. Plans included a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bain, Allison A., Abbott, Anne L., Miller, Laura L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4852754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27079648
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd13.150596
_version_ 1782429985398587392
author Bain, Allison A.
Abbott, Anne L.
Miller, Laura L.
author_facet Bain, Allison A.
Abbott, Anne L.
Miller, Laura L.
author_sort Bain, Allison A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Radon gas has recently become more prominent in discussions of lung cancer prevention nationally and in Iowa. A review in 2013 of cancer plans in the National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program found that 42% of cancer plans, including Iowa’s, had terminology on radon. Plans included awareness activities, home testing, remediation, policy, and policy evaluation. COMMUNITY CONTEXT: Iowa has the highest average radon concentrations in the United States; 70% of homes have radon concentrations above the Environmental Protection Agency’s action levels. Radon control activities in Iowa are led by the Iowa Cancer Consortium, the Iowa Department of Public Health, and the Iowa Radon Coalition. METHODS: A collaborative approach was used to increase levels of awareness, testing, and (if necessary) mitigation, and to introduce a comprehensive radon control policy in Iowa by engaging partners and stakeholders across the state. OUTCOME: The multipronged approach and collaborative work in Iowa appears to have been successful in increasing awareness: the number of radon tests completed in Iowa increased by 20% from 19,600 in 2009 to 23,500 in 2014, and the number of mitigations completed by certified mitigators increased by 108% from 2,600 to more than 5,400. INTERPRETATION: Through collaboration, Iowa communities are engaged in activities that led to increases in awareness, testing, mitigation, and policy. States interested in establishing a similar program should consider a multipronged approach involving multiple entities and stakeholders with different interests and abilities. Improvements in data collection and analysis are necessary to assess impact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4852754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48527542016-05-31 Successes and Challenges in Implementation of Radon Control Activities in Iowa, 2010–2015 Bain, Allison A. Abbott, Anne L. Miller, Laura L. Prev Chronic Dis Community Case Study BACKGROUND: Radon gas has recently become more prominent in discussions of lung cancer prevention nationally and in Iowa. A review in 2013 of cancer plans in the National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program found that 42% of cancer plans, including Iowa’s, had terminology on radon. Plans included awareness activities, home testing, remediation, policy, and policy evaluation. COMMUNITY CONTEXT: Iowa has the highest average radon concentrations in the United States; 70% of homes have radon concentrations above the Environmental Protection Agency’s action levels. Radon control activities in Iowa are led by the Iowa Cancer Consortium, the Iowa Department of Public Health, and the Iowa Radon Coalition. METHODS: A collaborative approach was used to increase levels of awareness, testing, and (if necessary) mitigation, and to introduce a comprehensive radon control policy in Iowa by engaging partners and stakeholders across the state. OUTCOME: The multipronged approach and collaborative work in Iowa appears to have been successful in increasing awareness: the number of radon tests completed in Iowa increased by 20% from 19,600 in 2009 to 23,500 in 2014, and the number of mitigations completed by certified mitigators increased by 108% from 2,600 to more than 5,400. INTERPRETATION: Through collaboration, Iowa communities are engaged in activities that led to increases in awareness, testing, mitigation, and policy. States interested in establishing a similar program should consider a multipronged approach involving multiple entities and stakeholders with different interests and abilities. Improvements in data collection and analysis are necessary to assess impact. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2016-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4852754/ /pubmed/27079648 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd13.150596 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Community Case Study
Bain, Allison A.
Abbott, Anne L.
Miller, Laura L.
Successes and Challenges in Implementation of Radon Control Activities in Iowa, 2010–2015
title Successes and Challenges in Implementation of Radon Control Activities in Iowa, 2010–2015
title_full Successes and Challenges in Implementation of Radon Control Activities in Iowa, 2010–2015
title_fullStr Successes and Challenges in Implementation of Radon Control Activities in Iowa, 2010–2015
title_full_unstemmed Successes and Challenges in Implementation of Radon Control Activities in Iowa, 2010–2015
title_short Successes and Challenges in Implementation of Radon Control Activities in Iowa, 2010–2015
title_sort successes and challenges in implementation of radon control activities in iowa, 2010–2015
topic Community Case Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4852754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27079648
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd13.150596
work_keys_str_mv AT bainallisona successesandchallengesinimplementationofradoncontrolactivitiesiniowa20102015
AT abbottannel successesandchallengesinimplementationofradoncontrolactivitiesiniowa20102015
AT millerlaural successesandchallengesinimplementationofradoncontrolactivitiesiniowa20102015