Cargando…

Psychometric Evaluation of 5- and 4-Item Versions of the LATCH Breastfeeding Assessment Tool during the Initial Postpartum Period among a Multiethnic Population

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the internal consistency, structural validity, sensitivity and specificity of the 5- and 4-item versions of the LATCH assessment tool among a multiethnic population in Singapore. METHODS: The study was a secondary analysis of a subset of data (n = 90...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lau, Ying, Htun, Tha Pyai, Lim, Peng Im, Ho-Lim, Sarah, Klainin-Yobas, Piyanee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4852936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27135746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154331
_version_ 1782430012159295488
author Lau, Ying
Htun, Tha Pyai
Lim, Peng Im
Ho-Lim, Sarah
Klainin-Yobas, Piyanee
author_facet Lau, Ying
Htun, Tha Pyai
Lim, Peng Im
Ho-Lim, Sarah
Klainin-Yobas, Piyanee
author_sort Lau, Ying
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the internal consistency, structural validity, sensitivity and specificity of the 5- and 4-item versions of the LATCH assessment tool among a multiethnic population in Singapore. METHODS: The study was a secondary analysis of a subset of data (n = 907) from our previous breastfeeding survey from 2013 to 2014. The internal consistency of the LATCH was examined using Cronbach’s alpha. The structural validity was assessed using an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and the proposed factors were confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using separate samples. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the LATCH score thresholds for predicting non-exclusive breastfeeding. RESULTS: The Cronbach’s alpha values of the 5- and 4-item LATCH assessments were 0.70 and 0.74, respectively. The EFA demonstrated a one-factor structure for the 5- and 4-item LATCH assessments among a randomized split of 334 vaginally delivered women. Two CFA of the 4-item LATCH demonstrated better fit indices of the models compared to the two CFA of the 5-item LATCH among another randomized split of 335 vaginally delivered women and 238 cesarean delivered women. Using cutoffs of 5.5 and 3.5 were recommended when predicting non-exclusive breastfeeding for 5- and 4-item versions of the LATCH assessment among vaginally delivered women (n = 669), with satisfactory sensitivities (94% and 95%), low specificities (0% and 2%), low positive predictive values (25%) and negative predictive values (20% and 47%). A cutoff of 5.5 was recommended to predict non-exclusive breastfeeding for 5- and 4-item versions among cesarean delivered women (n = 238) with satisfactory sensitivities (93% and 98%), low specificities (4% and 9%), low positive predictive values (41%) and negative predictive values (65% and 75%). Therefore, the tool has good sensitivity but poor specificity, positive and negative predictive values. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the 4-item version demonstrated sound psychometric properties compared to the 5-item version. Health professionals can use the 4-item LATCH as a clinical tool because it is a concise, easy-to-use and valid tool for assessing breastfeeding techniques among a multiethnic population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4852936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48529362016-05-13 Psychometric Evaluation of 5- and 4-Item Versions of the LATCH Breastfeeding Assessment Tool during the Initial Postpartum Period among a Multiethnic Population Lau, Ying Htun, Tha Pyai Lim, Peng Im Ho-Lim, Sarah Klainin-Yobas, Piyanee PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the internal consistency, structural validity, sensitivity and specificity of the 5- and 4-item versions of the LATCH assessment tool among a multiethnic population in Singapore. METHODS: The study was a secondary analysis of a subset of data (n = 907) from our previous breastfeeding survey from 2013 to 2014. The internal consistency of the LATCH was examined using Cronbach’s alpha. The structural validity was assessed using an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and the proposed factors were confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using separate samples. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the LATCH score thresholds for predicting non-exclusive breastfeeding. RESULTS: The Cronbach’s alpha values of the 5- and 4-item LATCH assessments were 0.70 and 0.74, respectively. The EFA demonstrated a one-factor structure for the 5- and 4-item LATCH assessments among a randomized split of 334 vaginally delivered women. Two CFA of the 4-item LATCH demonstrated better fit indices of the models compared to the two CFA of the 5-item LATCH among another randomized split of 335 vaginally delivered women and 238 cesarean delivered women. Using cutoffs of 5.5 and 3.5 were recommended when predicting non-exclusive breastfeeding for 5- and 4-item versions of the LATCH assessment among vaginally delivered women (n = 669), with satisfactory sensitivities (94% and 95%), low specificities (0% and 2%), low positive predictive values (25%) and negative predictive values (20% and 47%). A cutoff of 5.5 was recommended to predict non-exclusive breastfeeding for 5- and 4-item versions among cesarean delivered women (n = 238) with satisfactory sensitivities (93% and 98%), low specificities (4% and 9%), low positive predictive values (41%) and negative predictive values (65% and 75%). Therefore, the tool has good sensitivity but poor specificity, positive and negative predictive values. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the 4-item version demonstrated sound psychometric properties compared to the 5-item version. Health professionals can use the 4-item LATCH as a clinical tool because it is a concise, easy-to-use and valid tool for assessing breastfeeding techniques among a multiethnic population. Public Library of Science 2016-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4852936/ /pubmed/27135746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154331 Text en © 2016 Lau et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lau, Ying
Htun, Tha Pyai
Lim, Peng Im
Ho-Lim, Sarah
Klainin-Yobas, Piyanee
Psychometric Evaluation of 5- and 4-Item Versions of the LATCH Breastfeeding Assessment Tool during the Initial Postpartum Period among a Multiethnic Population
title Psychometric Evaluation of 5- and 4-Item Versions of the LATCH Breastfeeding Assessment Tool during the Initial Postpartum Period among a Multiethnic Population
title_full Psychometric Evaluation of 5- and 4-Item Versions of the LATCH Breastfeeding Assessment Tool during the Initial Postpartum Period among a Multiethnic Population
title_fullStr Psychometric Evaluation of 5- and 4-Item Versions of the LATCH Breastfeeding Assessment Tool during the Initial Postpartum Period among a Multiethnic Population
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric Evaluation of 5- and 4-Item Versions of the LATCH Breastfeeding Assessment Tool during the Initial Postpartum Period among a Multiethnic Population
title_short Psychometric Evaluation of 5- and 4-Item Versions of the LATCH Breastfeeding Assessment Tool during the Initial Postpartum Period among a Multiethnic Population
title_sort psychometric evaluation of 5- and 4-item versions of the latch breastfeeding assessment tool during the initial postpartum period among a multiethnic population
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4852936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27135746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154331
work_keys_str_mv AT lauying psychometricevaluationof5and4itemversionsofthelatchbreastfeedingassessmenttoolduringtheinitialpostpartumperiodamongamultiethnicpopulation
AT htunthapyai psychometricevaluationof5and4itemversionsofthelatchbreastfeedingassessmenttoolduringtheinitialpostpartumperiodamongamultiethnicpopulation
AT limpengim psychometricevaluationof5and4itemversionsofthelatchbreastfeedingassessmenttoolduringtheinitialpostpartumperiodamongamultiethnicpopulation
AT holimsarah psychometricevaluationof5and4itemversionsofthelatchbreastfeedingassessmenttoolduringtheinitialpostpartumperiodamongamultiethnicpopulation
AT klaininyobaspiyanee psychometricevaluationof5and4itemversionsofthelatchbreastfeedingassessmenttoolduringtheinitialpostpartumperiodamongamultiethnicpopulation