Cargando…

Physical Workload and Work Capacity across Occupational Groups

This study aimed to determine physical performance criteria of different occupational groups by investigating physical activity and energy expenditure in healthy Swiss employees in real-life workplaces on workdays and non-working days in relation to their aerobic capacity (VO(2max)). In this cross-s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brighenti-Zogg, Stefanie, Mundwiler, Jonas, Schüpbach, Ulla, Dieterle, Thomas, Wolfer, David Paul, Leuppi, Jörg Daniel, Miedinger, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4852946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27136206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154073
_version_ 1782430014201921536
author Brighenti-Zogg, Stefanie
Mundwiler, Jonas
Schüpbach, Ulla
Dieterle, Thomas
Wolfer, David Paul
Leuppi, Jörg Daniel
Miedinger, David
author_facet Brighenti-Zogg, Stefanie
Mundwiler, Jonas
Schüpbach, Ulla
Dieterle, Thomas
Wolfer, David Paul
Leuppi, Jörg Daniel
Miedinger, David
author_sort Brighenti-Zogg, Stefanie
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to determine physical performance criteria of different occupational groups by investigating physical activity and energy expenditure in healthy Swiss employees in real-life workplaces on workdays and non-working days in relation to their aerobic capacity (VO(2max)). In this cross-sectional study, 337 healthy and full-time employed adults were recruited. Participants were classified (nine categories) according to the International Standard Classification of Occupations 1988 and merged into three groups with low-, moderate- and high-intensity occupational activity. Daily steps, energy expenditure, metabolic equivalents and activity at different intensities were measured using the SenseWear Mini armband on seven consecutive days (23 hours/day). VO(2max) was determined by the 20-meter shuttle run test. Data of 303 subjects were considered for analysis (63% male, mean age: 33 yrs, SD 12), 101 from the low-, 102 from the moderate- and 100 from the high-intensity group. At work, the high-intensity group showed higher energy expenditure, metabolic equivalents, steps and activity at all intensities than the other groups (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in physical activity between the occupational groups on non-working days. VO(2max) did not differ across groups when stratified for gender. The upper workload limit was 21%, 29% and 44% of VO(2max) in the low-, moderate- and high-intensity group, respectively. Men had a lower limit than women due to their higher VO(2max) (26% vs. 37%), when all groups were combined. While this study did confirm that the average workload limit is one third of VO(2max), it showed that the average is misrepresenting the actual physical work demands of specific occupational groups, and that it does not account for gender-related differences in relative workload. Therefore, clinical practice needs to consider these differences with regard to a safe return to work, particularly for the high-intensity group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4852946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48529462016-05-13 Physical Workload and Work Capacity across Occupational Groups Brighenti-Zogg, Stefanie Mundwiler, Jonas Schüpbach, Ulla Dieterle, Thomas Wolfer, David Paul Leuppi, Jörg Daniel Miedinger, David PLoS One Research Article This study aimed to determine physical performance criteria of different occupational groups by investigating physical activity and energy expenditure in healthy Swiss employees in real-life workplaces on workdays and non-working days in relation to their aerobic capacity (VO(2max)). In this cross-sectional study, 337 healthy and full-time employed adults were recruited. Participants were classified (nine categories) according to the International Standard Classification of Occupations 1988 and merged into three groups with low-, moderate- and high-intensity occupational activity. Daily steps, energy expenditure, metabolic equivalents and activity at different intensities were measured using the SenseWear Mini armband on seven consecutive days (23 hours/day). VO(2max) was determined by the 20-meter shuttle run test. Data of 303 subjects were considered for analysis (63% male, mean age: 33 yrs, SD 12), 101 from the low-, 102 from the moderate- and 100 from the high-intensity group. At work, the high-intensity group showed higher energy expenditure, metabolic equivalents, steps and activity at all intensities than the other groups (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in physical activity between the occupational groups on non-working days. VO(2max) did not differ across groups when stratified for gender. The upper workload limit was 21%, 29% and 44% of VO(2max) in the low-, moderate- and high-intensity group, respectively. Men had a lower limit than women due to their higher VO(2max) (26% vs. 37%), when all groups were combined. While this study did confirm that the average workload limit is one third of VO(2max), it showed that the average is misrepresenting the actual physical work demands of specific occupational groups, and that it does not account for gender-related differences in relative workload. Therefore, clinical practice needs to consider these differences with regard to a safe return to work, particularly for the high-intensity group. Public Library of Science 2016-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4852946/ /pubmed/27136206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154073 Text en © 2016 Brighenti-Zogg et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brighenti-Zogg, Stefanie
Mundwiler, Jonas
Schüpbach, Ulla
Dieterle, Thomas
Wolfer, David Paul
Leuppi, Jörg Daniel
Miedinger, David
Physical Workload and Work Capacity across Occupational Groups
title Physical Workload and Work Capacity across Occupational Groups
title_full Physical Workload and Work Capacity across Occupational Groups
title_fullStr Physical Workload and Work Capacity across Occupational Groups
title_full_unstemmed Physical Workload and Work Capacity across Occupational Groups
title_short Physical Workload and Work Capacity across Occupational Groups
title_sort physical workload and work capacity across occupational groups
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4852946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27136206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154073
work_keys_str_mv AT brighentizoggstefanie physicalworkloadandworkcapacityacrossoccupationalgroups
AT mundwilerjonas physicalworkloadandworkcapacityacrossoccupationalgroups
AT schupbachulla physicalworkloadandworkcapacityacrossoccupationalgroups
AT dieterlethomas physicalworkloadandworkcapacityacrossoccupationalgroups
AT wolferdavidpaul physicalworkloadandworkcapacityacrossoccupationalgroups
AT leuppijorgdaniel physicalworkloadandworkcapacityacrossoccupationalgroups
AT miedingerdavid physicalworkloadandworkcapacityacrossoccupationalgroups