Cargando…

Intramural Comparison of NIST Laser and Optical Fiber Power Calibrations

The responsivity of two optical detectors was determined by the method of direct substitution in four different NIST measurement facilities. The measurements were intended to demonstrate the determination of absolute responsivity as provided by NIST calibration services at laser and optical-communic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lehman, John H., Vayshenker, Igor, Livigni, David J., Hadler, Joshua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4853116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27366611
http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.109.019
_version_ 1782430039291199488
author Lehman, John H.
Vayshenker, Igor
Livigni, David J.
Hadler, Joshua
author_facet Lehman, John H.
Vayshenker, Igor
Livigni, David J.
Hadler, Joshua
author_sort Lehman, John H.
collection PubMed
description The responsivity of two optical detectors was determined by the method of direct substitution in four different NIST measurement facilities. The measurements were intended to demonstrate the determination of absolute responsivity as provided by NIST calibration services at laser and optical-communication wavelengths; nominally 633 nm, 850 nm, 1060 nm, 1310 nm, and 1550 nm. The optical detectors have been designated as checks standards for the purpose of routine intramural comparison of our calibration services and to meet requirements of the NIST quality system, based on ISO 17025. The check standards are two optical-trap detectors, one based on silicon and the other on indium gallium arsenide photodiodes. The four measurement services are based on: (1) the laser optimized cryogenic radiometer (LOCR) and free field collimated laser light; (2) the C-series isoperibol calorimeter and free-field collimated laser light; (3) the electrically calibrated pyroelectric radiometer and fiber-coupled laser light; (4) the pyroelectric wedge trap detector, which measures light from a lamp source and monochromator. The results indicate that the responsivity of the check standards, as determined independently using the four services, agree to within the published expanded uncertainty ranging from approximately 0.02 % to 1.24 %.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4853116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48531162016-06-30 Intramural Comparison of NIST Laser and Optical Fiber Power Calibrations Lehman, John H. Vayshenker, Igor Livigni, David J. Hadler, Joshua J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol Article The responsivity of two optical detectors was determined by the method of direct substitution in four different NIST measurement facilities. The measurements were intended to demonstrate the determination of absolute responsivity as provided by NIST calibration services at laser and optical-communication wavelengths; nominally 633 nm, 850 nm, 1060 nm, 1310 nm, and 1550 nm. The optical detectors have been designated as checks standards for the purpose of routine intramural comparison of our calibration services and to meet requirements of the NIST quality system, based on ISO 17025. The check standards are two optical-trap detectors, one based on silicon and the other on indium gallium arsenide photodiodes. The four measurement services are based on: (1) the laser optimized cryogenic radiometer (LOCR) and free field collimated laser light; (2) the C-series isoperibol calorimeter and free-field collimated laser light; (3) the electrically calibrated pyroelectric radiometer and fiber-coupled laser light; (4) the pyroelectric wedge trap detector, which measures light from a lamp source and monochromator. The results indicate that the responsivity of the check standards, as determined independently using the four services, agree to within the published expanded uncertainty ranging from approximately 0.02 % to 1.24 %. [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology 2004 2004-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4853116/ /pubmed/27366611 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.109.019 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ The Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology is a publication of the U.S. Government. The papers are in the public domain and are not subject to copyright in the United States. Articles from J Res may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Article
Lehman, John H.
Vayshenker, Igor
Livigni, David J.
Hadler, Joshua
Intramural Comparison of NIST Laser and Optical Fiber Power Calibrations
title Intramural Comparison of NIST Laser and Optical Fiber Power Calibrations
title_full Intramural Comparison of NIST Laser and Optical Fiber Power Calibrations
title_fullStr Intramural Comparison of NIST Laser and Optical Fiber Power Calibrations
title_full_unstemmed Intramural Comparison of NIST Laser and Optical Fiber Power Calibrations
title_short Intramural Comparison of NIST Laser and Optical Fiber Power Calibrations
title_sort intramural comparison of nist laser and optical fiber power calibrations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4853116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27366611
http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.109.019
work_keys_str_mv AT lehmanjohnh intramuralcomparisonofnistlaserandopticalfiberpowercalibrations
AT vayshenkerigor intramuralcomparisonofnistlaserandopticalfiberpowercalibrations
AT livignidavidj intramuralcomparisonofnistlaserandopticalfiberpowercalibrations
AT hadlerjoshua intramuralcomparisonofnistlaserandopticalfiberpowercalibrations