Cargando…

Six steps in quality intervention development (6SQuID)

Improving the effectiveness of public health interventions relies as much on the attention paid to their design and feasibility as to their evaluation. Yet, compared to the vast literature on how to evaluate interventions, there is little to guide researchers or practitioners on how best to develop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wight, Daniel, Wimbush, Erica, Jepson, Ruth, Doi, Lawrence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4853546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26573236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-205952
_version_ 1782430090087366656
author Wight, Daniel
Wimbush, Erica
Jepson, Ruth
Doi, Lawrence
author_facet Wight, Daniel
Wimbush, Erica
Jepson, Ruth
Doi, Lawrence
author_sort Wight, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Improving the effectiveness of public health interventions relies as much on the attention paid to their design and feasibility as to their evaluation. Yet, compared to the vast literature on how to evaluate interventions, there is little to guide researchers or practitioners on how best to develop such interventions in practical, logical, evidence based ways to maximise likely effectiveness. Existing models for the development of public health interventions tend to have a strong social-psychological, individual behaviour change orientation and some take years to implement. This paper presents a pragmatic guide to six essential Steps for Quality Intervention Development (6SQuID). The focus is on public health interventions but the model should have wider applicability. Once a problem has been identified as needing intervention, the process of designing an intervention can be broken down into six crucial steps: (1) defining and understanding the problem and its causes; (2) identifying which causal or contextual factors are modifiable: which have the greatest scope for change and who would benefit most; (3) deciding on the mechanisms of change; (4) clarifying how these will be delivered; (5) testing and adapting the intervention; and (6) collecting sufficient evidence of effectiveness to proceed to a rigorous evaluation. If each of these steps is carefully addressed, better use will be made of scarce public resources by avoiding the costly evaluation, or implementation, of unpromising interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4853546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48535462016-05-06 Six steps in quality intervention development (6SQuID) Wight, Daniel Wimbush, Erica Jepson, Ruth Doi, Lawrence J Epidemiol Community Health Theory and Methods Improving the effectiveness of public health interventions relies as much on the attention paid to their design and feasibility as to their evaluation. Yet, compared to the vast literature on how to evaluate interventions, there is little to guide researchers or practitioners on how best to develop such interventions in practical, logical, evidence based ways to maximise likely effectiveness. Existing models for the development of public health interventions tend to have a strong social-psychological, individual behaviour change orientation and some take years to implement. This paper presents a pragmatic guide to six essential Steps for Quality Intervention Development (6SQuID). The focus is on public health interventions but the model should have wider applicability. Once a problem has been identified as needing intervention, the process of designing an intervention can be broken down into six crucial steps: (1) defining and understanding the problem and its causes; (2) identifying which causal or contextual factors are modifiable: which have the greatest scope for change and who would benefit most; (3) deciding on the mechanisms of change; (4) clarifying how these will be delivered; (5) testing and adapting the intervention; and (6) collecting sufficient evidence of effectiveness to proceed to a rigorous evaluation. If each of these steps is carefully addressed, better use will be made of scarce public resources by avoiding the costly evaluation, or implementation, of unpromising interventions. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-05 2015-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4853546/ /pubmed/26573236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-205952 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Theory and Methods
Wight, Daniel
Wimbush, Erica
Jepson, Ruth
Doi, Lawrence
Six steps in quality intervention development (6SQuID)
title Six steps in quality intervention development (6SQuID)
title_full Six steps in quality intervention development (6SQuID)
title_fullStr Six steps in quality intervention development (6SQuID)
title_full_unstemmed Six steps in quality intervention development (6SQuID)
title_short Six steps in quality intervention development (6SQuID)
title_sort six steps in quality intervention development (6squid)
topic Theory and Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4853546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26573236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-205952
work_keys_str_mv AT wightdaniel sixstepsinqualityinterventiondevelopment6squid
AT wimbusherica sixstepsinqualityinterventiondevelopment6squid
AT jepsonruth sixstepsinqualityinterventiondevelopment6squid
AT doilawrence sixstepsinqualityinterventiondevelopment6squid