Cargando…
Species and Media Effects on Soil Carbon Dynamics in the Landscape
Three woody shrub species [cleyera (Ternstroemia gymnanthera Thunb. ‘Conthery’), Indian hawthorn (Rhaphiolepis indica L.) and loropetalum (Loropetalum chinensis Oliv.‘Ruby’)] were container-grown for one growing season in 2008 using either pinebark (industry standard), clean chip residual or WholeTr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4853735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27140321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep25210 |
_version_ | 1782430116692885504 |
---|---|
author | Marble, S. Christopher Prior, Stephen A. Runion, G. Brett Torbert, H. Allen Gilliam, Charles H. Fain, Glenn B. Sibley, Jeff L. Knight, Patricia R. |
author_facet | Marble, S. Christopher Prior, Stephen A. Runion, G. Brett Torbert, H. Allen Gilliam, Charles H. Fain, Glenn B. Sibley, Jeff L. Knight, Patricia R. |
author_sort | Marble, S. Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | Three woody shrub species [cleyera (Ternstroemia gymnanthera Thunb. ‘Conthery’), Indian hawthorn (Rhaphiolepis indica L.) and loropetalum (Loropetalum chinensis Oliv.‘Ruby’)] were container-grown for one growing season in 2008 using either pinebark (industry standard), clean chip residual or WholeTree (derived by-products from the forestry industry) as potting substrates and then transplanted into the landscape in 2008. An Automated Carbon Efflux System was used to continually monitor soil CO(2) efflux from December 2010 through November 2011 in each species and substrate combination. Changes in soil carbon (C) levels as a result of potting substrate were assessed through soil sampling in 2009 and 2011 and plant biomass was determined at study conclusion. Results showed that soil CO(2)-C efflux was similar among all species and substrates, with few main effects of species or substrate observed throughout the study. Soil analysis showed that plots with pinebark contained higher levels of soil C in both 2009 and 2011, suggesting that pinebark decomposes slower than clean chip residual or WholeTree and consequently has greater C storage potential than the two alternative substrates. Results showed a net C gain for all species and substrate combinations; however, plants grown in pinebark had greater C sequestration potential. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4853735 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48537352016-05-16 Species and Media Effects on Soil Carbon Dynamics in the Landscape Marble, S. Christopher Prior, Stephen A. Runion, G. Brett Torbert, H. Allen Gilliam, Charles H. Fain, Glenn B. Sibley, Jeff L. Knight, Patricia R. Sci Rep Article Three woody shrub species [cleyera (Ternstroemia gymnanthera Thunb. ‘Conthery’), Indian hawthorn (Rhaphiolepis indica L.) and loropetalum (Loropetalum chinensis Oliv.‘Ruby’)] were container-grown for one growing season in 2008 using either pinebark (industry standard), clean chip residual or WholeTree (derived by-products from the forestry industry) as potting substrates and then transplanted into the landscape in 2008. An Automated Carbon Efflux System was used to continually monitor soil CO(2) efflux from December 2010 through November 2011 in each species and substrate combination. Changes in soil carbon (C) levels as a result of potting substrate were assessed through soil sampling in 2009 and 2011 and plant biomass was determined at study conclusion. Results showed that soil CO(2)-C efflux was similar among all species and substrates, with few main effects of species or substrate observed throughout the study. Soil analysis showed that plots with pinebark contained higher levels of soil C in both 2009 and 2011, suggesting that pinebark decomposes slower than clean chip residual or WholeTree and consequently has greater C storage potential than the two alternative substrates. Results showed a net C gain for all species and substrate combinations; however, plants grown in pinebark had greater C sequestration potential. Nature Publishing Group 2016-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4853735/ /pubmed/27140321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep25210 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Marble, S. Christopher Prior, Stephen A. Runion, G. Brett Torbert, H. Allen Gilliam, Charles H. Fain, Glenn B. Sibley, Jeff L. Knight, Patricia R. Species and Media Effects on Soil Carbon Dynamics in the Landscape |
title | Species and Media Effects on Soil Carbon Dynamics in the Landscape |
title_full | Species and Media Effects on Soil Carbon Dynamics in the Landscape |
title_fullStr | Species and Media Effects on Soil Carbon Dynamics in the Landscape |
title_full_unstemmed | Species and Media Effects on Soil Carbon Dynamics in the Landscape |
title_short | Species and Media Effects on Soil Carbon Dynamics in the Landscape |
title_sort | species and media effects on soil carbon dynamics in the landscape |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4853735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27140321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep25210 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marbleschristopher speciesandmediaeffectsonsoilcarbondynamicsinthelandscape AT priorstephena speciesandmediaeffectsonsoilcarbondynamicsinthelandscape AT runiongbrett speciesandmediaeffectsonsoilcarbondynamicsinthelandscape AT torberthallen speciesandmediaeffectsonsoilcarbondynamicsinthelandscape AT gilliamcharlesh speciesandmediaeffectsonsoilcarbondynamicsinthelandscape AT fainglennb speciesandmediaeffectsonsoilcarbondynamicsinthelandscape AT sibleyjeffl speciesandmediaeffectsonsoilcarbondynamicsinthelandscape AT knightpatriciar speciesandmediaeffectsonsoilcarbondynamicsinthelandscape |