Cargando…
Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and health outcomes: protocol for a systematic review
INTRODUCTION: Many developed countries have regional and national clinical registries aimed at improving health outcomes of patients diagnosed with particular diseases or cared for in particular healthcare settings. Clinical quality registries (CQRs) are clinical registries established with the purp...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4853981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27118288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010654 |
_version_ | 1782430156963446784 |
---|---|
author | Hoque, Dewan Md Emdadul Kumari, Varuni Ruseckaite, Rasa Romero, Lorena Evans, Sue M |
author_facet | Hoque, Dewan Md Emdadul Kumari, Varuni Ruseckaite, Rasa Romero, Lorena Evans, Sue M |
author_sort | Hoque, Dewan Md Emdadul |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Many developed countries have regional and national clinical registries aimed at improving health outcomes of patients diagnosed with particular diseases or cared for in particular healthcare settings. Clinical quality registries (CQRs) are clinical registries established with the purpose of monitoring quality of care and providing feedback to improve health outcomes. The aim of this systematic review is to understand the impact of CQRs on (1) mortality/survival; (2) measures of outcome that reflect a process or outcome of healthcare; (3) healthcare utilisation and (4) costs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The PRISMA-P methodology, checklist and standard strategy using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and structured data abstraction tools will be followed. A search of the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and CINAHL will be undertaken, in addition to Google Scholar and grey literature, to identify studies in English covering the period January 1980 to December 2014. Case–control, cohort, randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials which describe the registry as an intervention will be eligible for inclusion. Narrative synthesis of study findings will be conducted, guided by a conceptual framework developed to analyse the outcome measure of the registry using defined criteria. If sufficient studies are identified with a similar outcome of interest and measure using the same comparator and time of interval, results will be pooled for random-effects meta-analysis. Test for heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis will be conducted. To identify reporting bias, forest plots and funnel plots will be created and, if required, Egger's test will be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as primary data will not be collected. Review results will be published as a part of thesis, peer-reviewed journal and conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015017319. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4853981 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48539812016-05-06 Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and health outcomes: protocol for a systematic review Hoque, Dewan Md Emdadul Kumari, Varuni Ruseckaite, Rasa Romero, Lorena Evans, Sue M BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Many developed countries have regional and national clinical registries aimed at improving health outcomes of patients diagnosed with particular diseases or cared for in particular healthcare settings. Clinical quality registries (CQRs) are clinical registries established with the purpose of monitoring quality of care and providing feedback to improve health outcomes. The aim of this systematic review is to understand the impact of CQRs on (1) mortality/survival; (2) measures of outcome that reflect a process or outcome of healthcare; (3) healthcare utilisation and (4) costs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The PRISMA-P methodology, checklist and standard strategy using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and structured data abstraction tools will be followed. A search of the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and CINAHL will be undertaken, in addition to Google Scholar and grey literature, to identify studies in English covering the period January 1980 to December 2014. Case–control, cohort, randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials which describe the registry as an intervention will be eligible for inclusion. Narrative synthesis of study findings will be conducted, guided by a conceptual framework developed to analyse the outcome measure of the registry using defined criteria. If sufficient studies are identified with a similar outcome of interest and measure using the same comparator and time of interval, results will be pooled for random-effects meta-analysis. Test for heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis will be conducted. To identify reporting bias, forest plots and funnel plots will be created and, if required, Egger's test will be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as primary data will not be collected. Review results will be published as a part of thesis, peer-reviewed journal and conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015017319. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4853981/ /pubmed/27118288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010654 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Hoque, Dewan Md Emdadul Kumari, Varuni Ruseckaite, Rasa Romero, Lorena Evans, Sue M Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and health outcomes: protocol for a systematic review |
title | Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and health outcomes: protocol for a systematic review |
title_full | Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and health outcomes: protocol for a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and health outcomes: protocol for a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and health outcomes: protocol for a systematic review |
title_short | Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and health outcomes: protocol for a systematic review |
title_sort | impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and health outcomes: protocol for a systematic review |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4853981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27118288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010654 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoquedewanmdemdadul impactofclinicalregistriesonqualityofpatientcareandhealthoutcomesprotocolforasystematicreview AT kumarivaruni impactofclinicalregistriesonqualityofpatientcareandhealthoutcomesprotocolforasystematicreview AT ruseckaiterasa impactofclinicalregistriesonqualityofpatientcareandhealthoutcomesprotocolforasystematicreview AT romerolorena impactofclinicalregistriesonqualityofpatientcareandhealthoutcomesprotocolforasystematicreview AT evanssuem impactofclinicalregistriesonqualityofpatientcareandhealthoutcomesprotocolforasystematicreview |