Cargando…
Feasibility study to examine discrepancy rates in prespecified and reported outcomes in articles submitted to The BMJ
OBJECTIVES: Adding, omitting or changing prespecified outcomes can result in bias because it increases the potential for unacknowledged or post hoc revisions of the planned analyses. Journals have adopted initiatives such as requiring the prospective registration of trials and the submission of stud...
Autores principales: | Weston, Jennifer, Dwan, Kerry, Altman, Douglas, Clarke, Mike, Gamble, Carrol, Schroter, Sara, Williamson, Paula, Kirkham, Jamie |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4853983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27105712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010075 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Selective reporting in clinical trials - an examination of discrepancy rates in pre-specified and reported outcomes in articles submitted to the BMJ
por: Weston, Jennifer, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials
por: Dwan, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Outcome reporting bias in trials: a methodological approach for assessment and adjustment in systematic reviews
por: Kirkham, Jamie J, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Evaluation of editors’ abilities to predict the citation potential of research manuscripts submitted to The BMJ: a cohort study
por: Schroter, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Guidance to detect, evaluate and prevent the problem of selective reporting in trial publications
por: Dwan, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2013)