Cargando…
Does increasing the size of bi-weekly samples of records influence results when using the Global Trigger Tool? An observational study of retrospective record reviews of two different sample sizes
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of increasing sample of records reviewed bi-weekly with the Global Trigger Tool method to identify adverse events in hospitalised patients. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: A Norwegian 524-bed general hospital trust. PARTICIPANTS: 1920 medical...
Autores principales: | Mevik, Kjersti, Griffin, Frances A, Hansen, Tonje E, Deilkås, Ellen T, Vonen, Barthold |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4853999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27113238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010700 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Contribution of adverse events to death of hospitalised patients
por: Haukland, Ellinor Christin, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
When calculation of minimum sample size is not justified: When sample size calculation is not justified
por: Pourhoseingholi, Mohamad Amin, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Strengths and weaknesses of working with the Global Trigger Tool method for retrospective record review: focus group interviews with team members
por: Schildmeijer, Kristina, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Record Sized Stones
Publicado: (1900) -
Considerations when calculating the sample size for an inequality test
por: In, Junyong
Publicado: (2016)