Cargando…
Overstatements in abstract conclusions claiming effectiveness of interventions in psychiatry: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation
INTRODUCTION: Abstracts are the major and often the most important source of information for readers of the medical literature. However, there is mounting criticism that abstracts often exaggerate the positive findings and emphasise the beneficial effects of intervention beyond the actual findings m...
Autores principales: | Suganuma, Aya M, Shinohara, Kiyomi, Imai, Hissei, Takeshima, Nozomi, Hayasaka, Yu, Furukawa, Toshi A |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4854008/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27103624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009832 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Overstatements in abstract conclusions claiming effectiveness of interventions in psychiatry: A meta-epidemiological investigation
por: Shinohara, Kiyomi, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of first-generation and second-generation antidepressants in the acute treatment of major depression: protocol for a network meta-analysis
por: Furukawa, Toshi A, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Influence of overstated abstract conclusions on clinicians: a web-based randomised controlled trial
por: Shinohara, Kiyomi, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Physician characteristics associated with proper assessment of overstated conclusions in research abstracts: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
por: Tsujimoto, Yasushi, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Unguided Computer-Assisted Self-Help Interventions Without Human Contact in Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
por: Imai, Hissei, et al.
Publicado: (2022)