Cargando…

Wheezes, crackles and rhonchi: simplifying description of lung sounds increases the agreement on their classification: a study of 12 physicians' classification of lung sounds from video recordings

BACKGROUND: The European Respiratory Society (ERS) lung sounds repository contains 20 audiovisual recordings of children and adults. The present study aimed at determining the interobserver variation in the classification of sounds into detailed and broader categories of crackles and wheezes. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Melbye, Hasse, Garcia-Marcos, Luis, Brand, Paul, Everard, Mark, Priftis, Kostas, Pasterkamp, Hans
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4854017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27158515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000136
_version_ 1782430164683063296
author Melbye, Hasse
Garcia-Marcos, Luis
Brand, Paul
Everard, Mark
Priftis, Kostas
Pasterkamp, Hans
author_facet Melbye, Hasse
Garcia-Marcos, Luis
Brand, Paul
Everard, Mark
Priftis, Kostas
Pasterkamp, Hans
author_sort Melbye, Hasse
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The European Respiratory Society (ERS) lung sounds repository contains 20 audiovisual recordings of children and adults. The present study aimed at determining the interobserver variation in the classification of sounds into detailed and broader categories of crackles and wheezes. METHODS: Recordings from 10 children and 10 adults were classified into 10 predefined sounds by 12 observers, 6 paediatricians and 6 doctors for adult patients. Multirater kappa (Fleiss' κ) was calculated for each of the 10 adventitious sounds and for combined categories of sounds. RESULTS: The majority of observers agreed on the presence of at least one adventitious sound in 17 cases. Poor to fair agreement (κ<0.40) was usually found for the detailed descriptions of the adventitious sounds, whereas moderate to good agreement was reached for the combined categories of crackles (κ=0.62) and wheezes (κ=0.59). The paediatricians did not reach better agreement on the child cases than the family physicians and specialists in adult medicine. CONCLUSIONS: Descriptions of auscultation findings in broader terms were more reliably shared between observers compared to more detailed descriptions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4854017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48540172016-05-06 Wheezes, crackles and rhonchi: simplifying description of lung sounds increases the agreement on their classification: a study of 12 physicians' classification of lung sounds from video recordings Melbye, Hasse Garcia-Marcos, Luis Brand, Paul Everard, Mark Priftis, Kostas Pasterkamp, Hans BMJ Open Respir Res Respiratory Physiology BACKGROUND: The European Respiratory Society (ERS) lung sounds repository contains 20 audiovisual recordings of children and adults. The present study aimed at determining the interobserver variation in the classification of sounds into detailed and broader categories of crackles and wheezes. METHODS: Recordings from 10 children and 10 adults were classified into 10 predefined sounds by 12 observers, 6 paediatricians and 6 doctors for adult patients. Multirater kappa (Fleiss' κ) was calculated for each of the 10 adventitious sounds and for combined categories of sounds. RESULTS: The majority of observers agreed on the presence of at least one adventitious sound in 17 cases. Poor to fair agreement (κ<0.40) was usually found for the detailed descriptions of the adventitious sounds, whereas moderate to good agreement was reached for the combined categories of crackles (κ=0.62) and wheezes (κ=0.59). The paediatricians did not reach better agreement on the child cases than the family physicians and specialists in adult medicine. CONCLUSIONS: Descriptions of auscultation findings in broader terms were more reliably shared between observers compared to more detailed descriptions. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4854017/ /pubmed/27158515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000136 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Respiratory Physiology
Melbye, Hasse
Garcia-Marcos, Luis
Brand, Paul
Everard, Mark
Priftis, Kostas
Pasterkamp, Hans
Wheezes, crackles and rhonchi: simplifying description of lung sounds increases the agreement on their classification: a study of 12 physicians' classification of lung sounds from video recordings
title Wheezes, crackles and rhonchi: simplifying description of lung sounds increases the agreement on their classification: a study of 12 physicians' classification of lung sounds from video recordings
title_full Wheezes, crackles and rhonchi: simplifying description of lung sounds increases the agreement on their classification: a study of 12 physicians' classification of lung sounds from video recordings
title_fullStr Wheezes, crackles and rhonchi: simplifying description of lung sounds increases the agreement on their classification: a study of 12 physicians' classification of lung sounds from video recordings
title_full_unstemmed Wheezes, crackles and rhonchi: simplifying description of lung sounds increases the agreement on their classification: a study of 12 physicians' classification of lung sounds from video recordings
title_short Wheezes, crackles and rhonchi: simplifying description of lung sounds increases the agreement on their classification: a study of 12 physicians' classification of lung sounds from video recordings
title_sort wheezes, crackles and rhonchi: simplifying description of lung sounds increases the agreement on their classification: a study of 12 physicians' classification of lung sounds from video recordings
topic Respiratory Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4854017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27158515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000136
work_keys_str_mv AT melbyehasse wheezescracklesandrhonchisimplifyingdescriptionoflungsoundsincreasestheagreementontheirclassificationastudyof12physiciansclassificationoflungsoundsfromvideorecordings
AT garciamarcosluis wheezescracklesandrhonchisimplifyingdescriptionoflungsoundsincreasestheagreementontheirclassificationastudyof12physiciansclassificationoflungsoundsfromvideorecordings
AT brandpaul wheezescracklesandrhonchisimplifyingdescriptionoflungsoundsincreasestheagreementontheirclassificationastudyof12physiciansclassificationoflungsoundsfromvideorecordings
AT everardmark wheezescracklesandrhonchisimplifyingdescriptionoflungsoundsincreasestheagreementontheirclassificationastudyof12physiciansclassificationoflungsoundsfromvideorecordings
AT priftiskostas wheezescracklesandrhonchisimplifyingdescriptionoflungsoundsincreasestheagreementontheirclassificationastudyof12physiciansclassificationoflungsoundsfromvideorecordings
AT pasterkamphans wheezescracklesandrhonchisimplifyingdescriptionoflungsoundsincreasestheagreementontheirclassificationastudyof12physiciansclassificationoflungsoundsfromvideorecordings