Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of various cytomorphological grading systems in breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of breast carcinoma can be reliably made by fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Grading usually done in histological samples for the selection of therapy but not in cytology. Various cytological grading systems have been proposed; however, none of them is presently cons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arul, P., Masilamani, Suresh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4854051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27168704
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.180141
_version_ 1782430171949694976
author Arul, P.
Masilamani, Suresh
author_facet Arul, P.
Masilamani, Suresh
author_sort Arul, P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of breast carcinoma can be reliably made by fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Grading usually done in histological samples for the selection of therapy but not in cytology. Various cytological grading systems have been proposed; however, none of them is presently considered the gold standard to predict the prognosis. AIM: This study was undertaken to evaluate various 3-tier cytological grading systems and to determine the best possible system corresponds to the histological grading proposed by Elston and Ellis based on the method by Nottingham modification of Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 94 cases of breast carcinoma FNACs were graded using six cytological grading systems and compared with SBR method. Concordance, association, and correlation studies were done to select best possible cytological grading system. The interobserver reproducibility among the six grading systems was also assessed. RESULTS: Robinson method showed best correlation (ρ = 0.801; P = 0.0001 and τ = 0.783; P = 0.0001), maximum percent agreement (83/94 cases; 88.3%), and a substantial kappa value of agreement (κ = 0.737) with the Nottingham modification of SBR grading system followed by Mouriguand method. Taniguchi system showed better interobserver agreement (87.2%; κ = 0.738). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that all six cytological grading systems correlated positively with SBR method. However, Robinson's grading system demonstrated the best concordance, correlation, and substantial Kappa value of the agreement with the histological grading by SBR method in comparison to other 3-tier cytological grading systems. Hence, in conclusion, this grading should be routinely incorporated in the cytology reports as it correlates well with histological grade. Despite various cytological grading systems, Robinson's method is simple, more objective, and reproducible, hence being preferable for routine use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4854051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48540512016-05-10 Comparative evaluation of various cytomorphological grading systems in breast carcinoma Arul, P. Masilamani, Suresh Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol Original Article BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of breast carcinoma can be reliably made by fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Grading usually done in histological samples for the selection of therapy but not in cytology. Various cytological grading systems have been proposed; however, none of them is presently considered the gold standard to predict the prognosis. AIM: This study was undertaken to evaluate various 3-tier cytological grading systems and to determine the best possible system corresponds to the histological grading proposed by Elston and Ellis based on the method by Nottingham modification of Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 94 cases of breast carcinoma FNACs were graded using six cytological grading systems and compared with SBR method. Concordance, association, and correlation studies were done to select best possible cytological grading system. The interobserver reproducibility among the six grading systems was also assessed. RESULTS: Robinson method showed best correlation (ρ = 0.801; P = 0.0001 and τ = 0.783; P = 0.0001), maximum percent agreement (83/94 cases; 88.3%), and a substantial kappa value of agreement (κ = 0.737) with the Nottingham modification of SBR grading system followed by Mouriguand method. Taniguchi system showed better interobserver agreement (87.2%; κ = 0.738). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that all six cytological grading systems correlated positively with SBR method. However, Robinson's grading system demonstrated the best concordance, correlation, and substantial Kappa value of the agreement with the histological grading by SBR method in comparison to other 3-tier cytological grading systems. Hence, in conclusion, this grading should be routinely incorporated in the cytology reports as it correlates well with histological grade. Despite various cytological grading systems, Robinson's method is simple, more objective, and reproducible, hence being preferable for routine use. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4854051/ /pubmed/27168704 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.180141 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Arul, P.
Masilamani, Suresh
Comparative evaluation of various cytomorphological grading systems in breast carcinoma
title Comparative evaluation of various cytomorphological grading systems in breast carcinoma
title_full Comparative evaluation of various cytomorphological grading systems in breast carcinoma
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of various cytomorphological grading systems in breast carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of various cytomorphological grading systems in breast carcinoma
title_short Comparative evaluation of various cytomorphological grading systems in breast carcinoma
title_sort comparative evaluation of various cytomorphological grading systems in breast carcinoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4854051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27168704
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.180141
work_keys_str_mv AT arulp comparativeevaluationofvariouscytomorphologicalgradingsystemsinbreastcarcinoma
AT masilamanisuresh comparativeevaluationofvariouscytomorphologicalgradingsystemsinbreastcarcinoma