Cargando…

One-stage dorsal lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty for the treatment of failed hypospadias repair

The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the outcomes of patients who underwent one-stage onlay or inlay urethroplasty using a lingual mucosal graft (LMG) after failed hypospadias repairs. Inclusion criteria included a history of failed hypospadias repair, insufficiency of the local...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Hong-Bin, Xu, Yue-Min, Fu, Qiang, Sa, Ying-Long, Zhang, Jiong, Xie, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4854106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26228042
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.157545
_version_ 1782430184134148096
author Li, Hong-Bin
Xu, Yue-Min
Fu, Qiang
Sa, Ying-Long
Zhang, Jiong
Xie, Hong
author_facet Li, Hong-Bin
Xu, Yue-Min
Fu, Qiang
Sa, Ying-Long
Zhang, Jiong
Xie, Hong
author_sort Li, Hong-Bin
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the outcomes of patients who underwent one-stage onlay or inlay urethroplasty using a lingual mucosal graft (LMG) after failed hypospadias repairs. Inclusion criteria included a history of failed hypospadias repair, insufficiency of the local skin that made a reoperation with skin flaps difficult, and necessity of an oral mucosal graft urethroplasty. Patients were excluded if they had undergone a failed hypospadias repair using the foreskin or a multistage repair urethroplasty. Between January 2008 and December 2012, 110 patients with failed hypospadias repairs were treated in our center. Of these patients, 56 underwent a one-stage onlay or inlay urethroplasty using LMG. The median age was 21.8 years (range: 4–45 years). Of the 56 patients, one-stage onlay LMG urethroplasty was performed in 42 patients (group 1), and a modified Snodgrass technique using one-stage inlay LMG urethroplasty was performed in 14 (group 2). The median LMG urethroplasty length was 5.6 ± 1.6 cm (range: 4–13 cm). The mean follow-up was 34.7 months (range: 10–58 months), and complications developed in 12 of 56 patients (21.4%), including urethrocutaneous fistulas in 7 (6 in group 1, 1 in group 2) and neourethral strictures in 5 (4 in group 1, 1 in group 2). The total success rate was 78.6%. Our survey suggests that one-stage onlay or inlay urethroplasty with LMG may be an effective option to treat the patients with less available skin after failed hypospadias repairs; LMG harvesting is easy and safe, irrespective of the patient's age.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4854106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48541062016-05-10 One-stage dorsal lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty for the treatment of failed hypospadias repair Li, Hong-Bin Xu, Yue-Min Fu, Qiang Sa, Ying-Long Zhang, Jiong Xie, Hong Asian J Androl Original Article The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the outcomes of patients who underwent one-stage onlay or inlay urethroplasty using a lingual mucosal graft (LMG) after failed hypospadias repairs. Inclusion criteria included a history of failed hypospadias repair, insufficiency of the local skin that made a reoperation with skin flaps difficult, and necessity of an oral mucosal graft urethroplasty. Patients were excluded if they had undergone a failed hypospadias repair using the foreskin or a multistage repair urethroplasty. Between January 2008 and December 2012, 110 patients with failed hypospadias repairs were treated in our center. Of these patients, 56 underwent a one-stage onlay or inlay urethroplasty using LMG. The median age was 21.8 years (range: 4–45 years). Of the 56 patients, one-stage onlay LMG urethroplasty was performed in 42 patients (group 1), and a modified Snodgrass technique using one-stage inlay LMG urethroplasty was performed in 14 (group 2). The median LMG urethroplasty length was 5.6 ± 1.6 cm (range: 4–13 cm). The mean follow-up was 34.7 months (range: 10–58 months), and complications developed in 12 of 56 patients (21.4%), including urethrocutaneous fistulas in 7 (6 in group 1, 1 in group 2) and neourethral strictures in 5 (4 in group 1, 1 in group 2). The total success rate was 78.6%. Our survey suggests that one-stage onlay or inlay urethroplasty with LMG may be an effective option to treat the patients with less available skin after failed hypospadias repairs; LMG harvesting is easy and safe, irrespective of the patient's age. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 2015-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4854106/ /pubmed/26228042 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.157545 Text en Copyright: © Asian Journal of Andrology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Li, Hong-Bin
Xu, Yue-Min
Fu, Qiang
Sa, Ying-Long
Zhang, Jiong
Xie, Hong
One-stage dorsal lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty for the treatment of failed hypospadias repair
title One-stage dorsal lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty for the treatment of failed hypospadias repair
title_full One-stage dorsal lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty for the treatment of failed hypospadias repair
title_fullStr One-stage dorsal lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty for the treatment of failed hypospadias repair
title_full_unstemmed One-stage dorsal lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty for the treatment of failed hypospadias repair
title_short One-stage dorsal lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty for the treatment of failed hypospadias repair
title_sort one-stage dorsal lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty for the treatment of failed hypospadias repair
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4854106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26228042
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.157545
work_keys_str_mv AT lihongbin onestagedorsallingualmucosalgrafturethroplastyforthetreatmentoffailedhypospadiasrepair
AT xuyuemin onestagedorsallingualmucosalgrafturethroplastyforthetreatmentoffailedhypospadiasrepair
AT fuqiang onestagedorsallingualmucosalgrafturethroplastyforthetreatmentoffailedhypospadiasrepair
AT sayinglong onestagedorsallingualmucosalgrafturethroplastyforthetreatmentoffailedhypospadiasrepair
AT zhangjiong onestagedorsallingualmucosalgrafturethroplastyforthetreatmentoffailedhypospadiasrepair
AT xiehong onestagedorsallingualmucosalgrafturethroplastyforthetreatmentoffailedhypospadiasrepair