Cargando…

Outcomes of excimer laser enhancements in pseudophakic patients with multifocal intraocular lens

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess visual and refractive outcomes of laser vision correction (LVC) to correct residual refraction after multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 782 eyes that underwent LVC to correct unintended ametr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schallhorn, Steven C, Venter, Jan A, Teenan, David, Schallhorn, Julie M, Hettinger, Keith A, Hannan, Stephen J, Pelouskova, Martina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4854244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27175059
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S106731
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess visual and refractive outcomes of laser vision correction (LVC) to correct residual refraction after multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 782 eyes that underwent LVC to correct unintended ametropia after multifocal IOL implantation were evaluated. Of all multifocal lenses implanted during primary procedure, 98.7% were refractive and 1.3% had a diffractive design. All eyes were treated with VISX STAR S4 IR excimer laser using a convectional ablation profile. Refractive outcomes, visual acuities, patient satisfaction, and quality of life were evaluated at the last available visit. RESULTS: The mean time between enhancement and last visit was 6.3±4.4 months. Manifest spherical equivalent changed from −0.02±0.83 D (−3.38 D to +2.25 D) pre-enhancement to 0.00±0.34 D (−1.38 D to +1.25 D) post-enhancement. At the last follow-up, the percentage of eyes within 0.50 D and 1.00 D of emmetropia was 90.4% and 99.5%, respectively. Of all eyes, 74.9% achieved monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity 20/20 or better. The mean corrected distance visual acuity remained the same before (−0.04±0.06 logMAR [logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution]) and after LVC procedure (−0.04±0.07 logMAR; P=0.70). There was a slight improvement in visual phenomena (starburst, halo, glare, ghosting/double vision) following the enhancement. No sight-threatening complications related to LVC occurred in this study. CONCLUSION: LVC in pseudophakic patients with multifocal IOL was safe, effective, and predictable in a large cohort of patients.