Cargando…

Combination chemoprophylaxis and immunoprophylaxis in reducing the incidence of leprosy

Leprosy is a complex infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae that is a leading cause of nontraumatic peripheral neuropathy. Current control strategies, with a goal of early diagnosis and treatment in the form of multidrug therapy, have maintained new case reports at ~225,000 per year. Diag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duthie, Malcolm S, Balagon, Marivic F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4854245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27175099
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S76058
_version_ 1782430198218620928
author Duthie, Malcolm S
Balagon, Marivic F
author_facet Duthie, Malcolm S
Balagon, Marivic F
author_sort Duthie, Malcolm S
collection PubMed
description Leprosy is a complex infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae that is a leading cause of nontraumatic peripheral neuropathy. Current control strategies, with a goal of early diagnosis and treatment in the form of multidrug therapy, have maintained new case reports at ~225,000 per year. Diagnostic capabilities are limited and even with revisions to multidrug therapy regimen, treatment can still require up to a year of daily drug intake. Although alternate chemotherapies or adjunct immune therapies that could provide shorter or simpler treatment regimen appear possible, only a limited number of trials have been conducted. More proactive strategies appear necessary in the drive to elimination. As a prevention strategy, most chemoprophylaxis campaigns to date have provided about a 2-year protective window. Vaccination, in the form of a single bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) immunization, generally provides ~50% reduction in leprosy cases. Adapting control strategies to provide both chemoprophylaxis and immunoprophylaxis has distinct appeal, with chemoprophylaxis theoretically buttressed by vaccination to generate immediate protection that can be sustained in the long term. We also discuss simple assays measuring biomarkers as surrogates for disease development or replacements for invasive, but not particularly sensitive, direct measures of M. leprae infection. Such assays could facilitate the clinical trials required to develop these new chemoprophylaxis, immunoprophylaxis strategies, and transition into wider use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4854245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48542452016-05-12 Combination chemoprophylaxis and immunoprophylaxis in reducing the incidence of leprosy Duthie, Malcolm S Balagon, Marivic F Risk Manag Healthc Policy Review Leprosy is a complex infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae that is a leading cause of nontraumatic peripheral neuropathy. Current control strategies, with a goal of early diagnosis and treatment in the form of multidrug therapy, have maintained new case reports at ~225,000 per year. Diagnostic capabilities are limited and even with revisions to multidrug therapy regimen, treatment can still require up to a year of daily drug intake. Although alternate chemotherapies or adjunct immune therapies that could provide shorter or simpler treatment regimen appear possible, only a limited number of trials have been conducted. More proactive strategies appear necessary in the drive to elimination. As a prevention strategy, most chemoprophylaxis campaigns to date have provided about a 2-year protective window. Vaccination, in the form of a single bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) immunization, generally provides ~50% reduction in leprosy cases. Adapting control strategies to provide both chemoprophylaxis and immunoprophylaxis has distinct appeal, with chemoprophylaxis theoretically buttressed by vaccination to generate immediate protection that can be sustained in the long term. We also discuss simple assays measuring biomarkers as surrogates for disease development or replacements for invasive, but not particularly sensitive, direct measures of M. leprae infection. Such assays could facilitate the clinical trials required to develop these new chemoprophylaxis, immunoprophylaxis strategies, and transition into wider use. Dove Medical Press 2016-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4854245/ /pubmed/27175099 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S76058 Text en © 2016 Duthie and Balagon. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Duthie, Malcolm S
Balagon, Marivic F
Combination chemoprophylaxis and immunoprophylaxis in reducing the incidence of leprosy
title Combination chemoprophylaxis and immunoprophylaxis in reducing the incidence of leprosy
title_full Combination chemoprophylaxis and immunoprophylaxis in reducing the incidence of leprosy
title_fullStr Combination chemoprophylaxis and immunoprophylaxis in reducing the incidence of leprosy
title_full_unstemmed Combination chemoprophylaxis and immunoprophylaxis in reducing the incidence of leprosy
title_short Combination chemoprophylaxis and immunoprophylaxis in reducing the incidence of leprosy
title_sort combination chemoprophylaxis and immunoprophylaxis in reducing the incidence of leprosy
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4854245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27175099
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S76058
work_keys_str_mv AT duthiemalcolms combinationchemoprophylaxisandimmunoprophylaxisinreducingtheincidenceofleprosy
AT balagonmarivicf combinationchemoprophylaxisandimmunoprophylaxisinreducingtheincidenceofleprosy