Cargando…
Risk of Advanced Neoplasia in First-Degree Relatives with Colorectal Cancer: A Large Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study
BACKGROUND: First-degree relatives (FDR) of patients with colorectal cancer have a higher risk of developing colorectal cancer than the general population. For this reason, screening guidelines recommend colonoscopy every 5 or 10 y, starting at the age of 40, depending on whether colorectal cancer i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4854417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27138769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002008 |
_version_ | 1782430219763712000 |
---|---|
author | Quintero, Enrique Carrillo, Marta Leoz, Maria-Liz Cubiella, Joaquin Gargallo, Carla Lanas, Angel Bujanda, Luis Gimeno-García, Antonio Z. Hernández-Guerra, Manuel Nicolás-Pérez, David Alonso-Abreu, Inmaculada Morillas, Juan Diego Balaguer, Francesc Muriel, Alfonso |
author_facet | Quintero, Enrique Carrillo, Marta Leoz, Maria-Liz Cubiella, Joaquin Gargallo, Carla Lanas, Angel Bujanda, Luis Gimeno-García, Antonio Z. Hernández-Guerra, Manuel Nicolás-Pérez, David Alonso-Abreu, Inmaculada Morillas, Juan Diego Balaguer, Francesc Muriel, Alfonso |
author_sort | Quintero, Enrique |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: First-degree relatives (FDR) of patients with colorectal cancer have a higher risk of developing colorectal cancer than the general population. For this reason, screening guidelines recommend colonoscopy every 5 or 10 y, starting at the age of 40, depending on whether colorectal cancer in the index-case is diagnosed at <60 or ≥60 y, respectively. However, studies on the risk of neoplastic lesions are inconclusive. The aim of this study was to determine the risk of advanced neoplasia (three or more non-advanced adenomas, advanced adenoma, or invasive cancer) in FDR of patients with colorectal cancer compared to average-risk individuals (i.e., asymptomatic adults 50 to 69 y of age with no family history of colorectal cancer). METHODS AND FINDINGS: This cross-sectional analysis includes data from 8,498 individuals undergoing their first lifetime screening colonoscopy between 2006 and 2012 at six Spanish tertiary hospitals. Of these individuals, 3,015 were defined as asymptomatic FDR of patients with colorectal cancer (“familial-risk group”) and 3,038 as asymptomatic with average-risk for colorectal cancer (“average-risk group”). The familial-risk group was stratified as one FDR, with one family member diagnosed with colorectal cancer at ≥60 y (n = 1,884) or at <60 y (n = 831), and as two FDR, with two family members diagnosed with colorectal cancer at any age (n = 300). Multiple logistic regression analysis was used for between-group comparisons after adjusting for potential confounders (age, gender, and center). Compared with the average-risk group, advanced neoplasia was significantly more prevalent in individuals having two FDR with colorectal cancer (odds ratio [OR] 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36–2.66, p < 0.001), but not in those having one FDR with colorectal cancer diagnosed at ≥60 y (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.83–1.27, p = 0.77) and <60 y (OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.90–1.58, p = 0.20). After the age of 50 y, men developed advanced neoplasia over two times more frequently than women and advanced neoplasia appeared at least ten y earlier. Fewer colonoscopies by 2-fold were required to detect one advanced neoplasia in men than in women. Major limitations of this study were first that although average-risk individuals were consecutively included in a randomized control trial, this was not the case for all individuals in the familial-risk cohort; and second, the difference in age between the average-risk and familial-risk cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals having two FDR with colorectal cancer showed an increased risk of advanced neoplasia compared to those with average-risk for colorectal cancer. Men had over 2-fold higher risk of advanced neoplasia than women, independent of family history. These data suggest that screening colonoscopy guidelines should be revised in the familial-risk population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4854417 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48544172016-05-07 Risk of Advanced Neoplasia in First-Degree Relatives with Colorectal Cancer: A Large Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study Quintero, Enrique Carrillo, Marta Leoz, Maria-Liz Cubiella, Joaquin Gargallo, Carla Lanas, Angel Bujanda, Luis Gimeno-García, Antonio Z. Hernández-Guerra, Manuel Nicolás-Pérez, David Alonso-Abreu, Inmaculada Morillas, Juan Diego Balaguer, Francesc Muriel, Alfonso PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: First-degree relatives (FDR) of patients with colorectal cancer have a higher risk of developing colorectal cancer than the general population. For this reason, screening guidelines recommend colonoscopy every 5 or 10 y, starting at the age of 40, depending on whether colorectal cancer in the index-case is diagnosed at <60 or ≥60 y, respectively. However, studies on the risk of neoplastic lesions are inconclusive. The aim of this study was to determine the risk of advanced neoplasia (three or more non-advanced adenomas, advanced adenoma, or invasive cancer) in FDR of patients with colorectal cancer compared to average-risk individuals (i.e., asymptomatic adults 50 to 69 y of age with no family history of colorectal cancer). METHODS AND FINDINGS: This cross-sectional analysis includes data from 8,498 individuals undergoing their first lifetime screening colonoscopy between 2006 and 2012 at six Spanish tertiary hospitals. Of these individuals, 3,015 were defined as asymptomatic FDR of patients with colorectal cancer (“familial-risk group”) and 3,038 as asymptomatic with average-risk for colorectal cancer (“average-risk group”). The familial-risk group was stratified as one FDR, with one family member diagnosed with colorectal cancer at ≥60 y (n = 1,884) or at <60 y (n = 831), and as two FDR, with two family members diagnosed with colorectal cancer at any age (n = 300). Multiple logistic regression analysis was used for between-group comparisons after adjusting for potential confounders (age, gender, and center). Compared with the average-risk group, advanced neoplasia was significantly more prevalent in individuals having two FDR with colorectal cancer (odds ratio [OR] 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36–2.66, p < 0.001), but not in those having one FDR with colorectal cancer diagnosed at ≥60 y (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.83–1.27, p = 0.77) and <60 y (OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.90–1.58, p = 0.20). After the age of 50 y, men developed advanced neoplasia over two times more frequently than women and advanced neoplasia appeared at least ten y earlier. Fewer colonoscopies by 2-fold were required to detect one advanced neoplasia in men than in women. Major limitations of this study were first that although average-risk individuals were consecutively included in a randomized control trial, this was not the case for all individuals in the familial-risk cohort; and second, the difference in age between the average-risk and familial-risk cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals having two FDR with colorectal cancer showed an increased risk of advanced neoplasia compared to those with average-risk for colorectal cancer. Men had over 2-fold higher risk of advanced neoplasia than women, independent of family history. These data suggest that screening colonoscopy guidelines should be revised in the familial-risk population. Public Library of Science 2016-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4854417/ /pubmed/27138769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002008 Text en © 2016 Quintero et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Quintero, Enrique Carrillo, Marta Leoz, Maria-Liz Cubiella, Joaquin Gargallo, Carla Lanas, Angel Bujanda, Luis Gimeno-García, Antonio Z. Hernández-Guerra, Manuel Nicolás-Pérez, David Alonso-Abreu, Inmaculada Morillas, Juan Diego Balaguer, Francesc Muriel, Alfonso Risk of Advanced Neoplasia in First-Degree Relatives with Colorectal Cancer: A Large Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study |
title | Risk of Advanced Neoplasia in First-Degree Relatives with Colorectal Cancer: A Large Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full | Risk of Advanced Neoplasia in First-Degree Relatives with Colorectal Cancer: A Large Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study |
title_fullStr | Risk of Advanced Neoplasia in First-Degree Relatives with Colorectal Cancer: A Large Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk of Advanced Neoplasia in First-Degree Relatives with Colorectal Cancer: A Large Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study |
title_short | Risk of Advanced Neoplasia in First-Degree Relatives with Colorectal Cancer: A Large Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study |
title_sort | risk of advanced neoplasia in first-degree relatives with colorectal cancer: a large multicenter cross-sectional study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4854417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27138769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quinteroenrique riskofadvancedneoplasiainfirstdegreerelativeswithcolorectalcanceralargemulticentercrosssectionalstudy AT carrillomarta riskofadvancedneoplasiainfirstdegreerelativeswithcolorectalcanceralargemulticentercrosssectionalstudy AT leozmarializ riskofadvancedneoplasiainfirstdegreerelativeswithcolorectalcanceralargemulticentercrosssectionalstudy AT cubiellajoaquin riskofadvancedneoplasiainfirstdegreerelativeswithcolorectalcanceralargemulticentercrosssectionalstudy AT gargallocarla riskofadvancedneoplasiainfirstdegreerelativeswithcolorectalcanceralargemulticentercrosssectionalstudy AT lanasangel riskofadvancedneoplasiainfirstdegreerelativeswithcolorectalcanceralargemulticentercrosssectionalstudy AT bujandaluis riskofadvancedneoplasiainfirstdegreerelativeswithcolorectalcanceralargemulticentercrosssectionalstudy AT gimenogarciaantonioz riskofadvancedneoplasiainfirstdegreerelativeswithcolorectalcanceralargemulticentercrosssectionalstudy AT hernandezguerramanuel riskofadvancedneoplasiainfirstdegreerelativeswithcolorectalcanceralargemulticentercrosssectionalstudy AT nicolasperezdavid riskofadvancedneoplasiainfirstdegreerelativeswithcolorectalcanceralargemulticentercrosssectionalstudy AT alonsoabreuinmaculada riskofadvancedneoplasiainfirstdegreerelativeswithcolorectalcanceralargemulticentercrosssectionalstudy AT morillasjuandiego riskofadvancedneoplasiainfirstdegreerelativeswithcolorectalcanceralargemulticentercrosssectionalstudy AT balaguerfrancesc riskofadvancedneoplasiainfirstdegreerelativeswithcolorectalcanceralargemulticentercrosssectionalstudy AT murielalfonso riskofadvancedneoplasiainfirstdegreerelativeswithcolorectalcanceralargemulticentercrosssectionalstudy AT riskofadvancedneoplasiainfirstdegreerelativeswithcolorectalcanceralargemulticentercrosssectionalstudy |