Cargando…
Surrogate consent to non-beneficial research: erring on the right side when substituted judgments may be inaccurate
Part of the standard protection of decisionally incapacitated research subjects is a prohibition against enrolling them unless surrogate decision makers authorize it. A common view is that surrogates primarily ought to make their decisions based on what the decisionally incapacitated subject would h...
Autores principales: | Johansson, Mats, Broström, Linus |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4854930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27130296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11017-016-9363-y |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Limits of Conscious Deception Detection: When Reliance on False Deception Cues Contributes to Inaccurate Judgments
por: Stel, Mariëlle, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
On the Likelihood of Surrogates Conforming to the Substituted
Judgment Standard When Making End-of-Life Decisions for Their
Partner
por: Batteux, Eleonore, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Overestimation of Phonological Judgments on the Right Side of Space
por: Turriziani, Patrizia, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Temporising and respect for patient self-determination
por: Lindberg, Jenny, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Co-payment for Unfunded Additional Care in Publicly Funded Healthcare Systems: Ethical Issues
por: Färdow, Joakim, et al.
Publicado: (2019)