Cargando…

Factors Associated With the Performance of Extended Colonic Resection vs. Segmental Resection in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Study

OBJECTIVES: Early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence rates are rising. This group is susceptible to heritable conditions (i.e., Lynch syndrome (LS)) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with high metachronous CRC rates after segmental resection. Hence, extended colonic resection (ECR) is often...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karlitz, Jordan J, Sherrill, Meredith R, DiGiacomo, Daniel V, Hsieh, Mei-chin, Schmidt, Beth, Wu, Xiao-Cheng, Chen, Vivien W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27077958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2016.17
_version_ 1782430321751359488
author Karlitz, Jordan J
Sherrill, Meredith R
DiGiacomo, Daniel V
Hsieh, Mei-chin
Schmidt, Beth
Wu, Xiao-Cheng
Chen, Vivien W
author_facet Karlitz, Jordan J
Sherrill, Meredith R
DiGiacomo, Daniel V
Hsieh, Mei-chin
Schmidt, Beth
Wu, Xiao-Cheng
Chen, Vivien W
author_sort Karlitz, Jordan J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence rates are rising. This group is susceptible to heritable conditions (i.e., Lynch syndrome (LS)) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with high metachronous CRC rates after segmental resection. Hence, extended colonic resection (ECR) is often performed and considered generally in young patients. As there are no population-based studies analyzing resection extent in early-onset CRC, we used CDC Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) data to assess state-wide operative practices. METHODS: Using CER and Louisiana Tumor Registry data, all CRC patients aged ≤50 years, diagnosed in Louisiana in 2011, who underwent surgery in 2011–2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Prevalence of, and the factors associated with operation type (ECR including subtotal/total/proctocolectomy vs. segmental resection) were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 2,427 CRC patients, 274 were aged ≤50 years. In all, 234 underwent surgery at 53 unique facilities and 6.8% underwent ECR. Statistically significant ECR-associated factors included age ≤45 years, polyposis, synchronous/metachronous LS-associated cancers, and IBD. Abnormal microsatellite instability (MSI) was not ECR-associated. ECR was not performed in sporadic CRC. CONCLUSIONS: ECR is performed in the setting of clinically obvious associated high-risk features (polyposis, IBD, synchronous/metachronous cancers) but not in isolated/sporadic CRC. However, attention must be paid to patients with seemingly lower risk characteristics (isolated CRC, no polyposis), as LS can still be present. In addition, the presumed sporadic group requires further study as metachronous CRC risk in early-onset sporadic CRC has not been well-defined, and some may harbor undefined/undiagnosed hereditary conditions. Abnormal MSI (LS risk) is not associated with ECR; abnormal MSI results often return postoperatively after segmental resection has already occurred, which is a contributing factor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4855160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48551602016-05-17 Factors Associated With the Performance of Extended Colonic Resection vs. Segmental Resection in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Study Karlitz, Jordan J Sherrill, Meredith R DiGiacomo, Daniel V Hsieh, Mei-chin Schmidt, Beth Wu, Xiao-Cheng Chen, Vivien W Clin Transl Gastroenterol Original Contributions OBJECTIVES: Early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence rates are rising. This group is susceptible to heritable conditions (i.e., Lynch syndrome (LS)) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with high metachronous CRC rates after segmental resection. Hence, extended colonic resection (ECR) is often performed and considered generally in young patients. As there are no population-based studies analyzing resection extent in early-onset CRC, we used CDC Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) data to assess state-wide operative practices. METHODS: Using CER and Louisiana Tumor Registry data, all CRC patients aged ≤50 years, diagnosed in Louisiana in 2011, who underwent surgery in 2011–2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Prevalence of, and the factors associated with operation type (ECR including subtotal/total/proctocolectomy vs. segmental resection) were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 2,427 CRC patients, 274 were aged ≤50 years. In all, 234 underwent surgery at 53 unique facilities and 6.8% underwent ECR. Statistically significant ECR-associated factors included age ≤45 years, polyposis, synchronous/metachronous LS-associated cancers, and IBD. Abnormal microsatellite instability (MSI) was not ECR-associated. ECR was not performed in sporadic CRC. CONCLUSIONS: ECR is performed in the setting of clinically obvious associated high-risk features (polyposis, IBD, synchronous/metachronous cancers) but not in isolated/sporadic CRC. However, attention must be paid to patients with seemingly lower risk characteristics (isolated CRC, no polyposis), as LS can still be present. In addition, the presumed sporadic group requires further study as metachronous CRC risk in early-onset sporadic CRC has not been well-defined, and some may harbor undefined/undiagnosed hereditary conditions. Abnormal MSI (LS risk) is not associated with ECR; abnormal MSI results often return postoperatively after segmental resection has already occurred, which is a contributing factor. Nature Publishing Group 2016-04 2016-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4855160/ /pubmed/27077958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2016.17 Text en Copyright © 2016 American College of Gastroenterology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology is an open-access journal published by Nature Publishing Group. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Karlitz, Jordan J
Sherrill, Meredith R
DiGiacomo, Daniel V
Hsieh, Mei-chin
Schmidt, Beth
Wu, Xiao-Cheng
Chen, Vivien W
Factors Associated With the Performance of Extended Colonic Resection vs. Segmental Resection in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Study
title Factors Associated With the Performance of Extended Colonic Resection vs. Segmental Resection in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Study
title_full Factors Associated With the Performance of Extended Colonic Resection vs. Segmental Resection in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Study
title_fullStr Factors Associated With the Performance of Extended Colonic Resection vs. Segmental Resection in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Study
title_full_unstemmed Factors Associated With the Performance of Extended Colonic Resection vs. Segmental Resection in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Study
title_short Factors Associated With the Performance of Extended Colonic Resection vs. Segmental Resection in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Study
title_sort factors associated with the performance of extended colonic resection vs. segmental resection in early-onset colorectal cancer: a population-based study
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27077958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2016.17
work_keys_str_mv AT karlitzjordanj factorsassociatedwiththeperformanceofextendedcolonicresectionvssegmentalresectioninearlyonsetcolorectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT sherrillmeredithr factorsassociatedwiththeperformanceofextendedcolonicresectionvssegmentalresectioninearlyonsetcolorectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT digiacomodanielv factorsassociatedwiththeperformanceofextendedcolonicresectionvssegmentalresectioninearlyonsetcolorectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT hsiehmeichin factorsassociatedwiththeperformanceofextendedcolonicresectionvssegmentalresectioninearlyonsetcolorectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT schmidtbeth factorsassociatedwiththeperformanceofextendedcolonicresectionvssegmentalresectioninearlyonsetcolorectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT wuxiaocheng factorsassociatedwiththeperformanceofextendedcolonicresectionvssegmentalresectioninearlyonsetcolorectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT chenvivienw factorsassociatedwiththeperformanceofextendedcolonicresectionvssegmentalresectioninearlyonsetcolorectalcancerapopulationbasedstudy