Cargando…

Summer undergraduate research: A new pipeline for pain clinical practice and research

BACKGROUND: Most medical schools fail to provide adequate training of clinicians in the treatment of pain. Similarly, despite the fact that over 1/3 of Americans suffer from chronic pain, National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for pain represents only ~1 % of the NIH budget. These issues may di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kolber, Benedict J., Janjic, Jelena M., Pollock, John A., Tidgewell, Kevin J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27142616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0648-7
_version_ 1782430346241900544
author Kolber, Benedict J.
Janjic, Jelena M.
Pollock, John A.
Tidgewell, Kevin J.
author_facet Kolber, Benedict J.
Janjic, Jelena M.
Pollock, John A.
Tidgewell, Kevin J.
author_sort Kolber, Benedict J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most medical schools fail to provide adequate training of clinicians in the treatment of pain. Similarly, despite the fact that over 1/3 of Americans suffer from chronic pain, National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for pain represents only ~1 % of the NIH budget. These issues may dissuade students from pursing pain in their clinical and research careers. To address these gaps in training and funding, we argue that exposing students to pain science early in their careers, at the undergraduate level, may be an effective method to develop a pipeline for future pain clinicians and scientists. To highlight our argument, we will describe our recent successful implementation of a cross-disciplinary and community-engaged biomedical summer research program. The Pain Undergraduate Research Experience (PURE) summer program involved both off-site and on-site experiences to expose undergraduate students to the range of careers in the pain field from basic science to clinical practice. The objective of the 10-week long PURE program was to evaluate whether a combination of basic science research, clinical practice visits, and patient interactions would increase student understanding of and exposure to the underlying science of pain. METHODS: A pre-post cohort study was used without a comparison group. Entry and exit surveys were used to evaluate students’ perceptions about pain clinical practice and research, student interest in pain, and student confidence about communicating about pain and doing basic science pain research. RESULTS: Students reported significant increases to a number of questions in the survey. Questions were scored on 5 point Likert scales and there was significant increases in student understanding of what life is like with chronic pain (2.6 vs 4.3 post survey), their confidence in explaining pain to a patient (2.8 vs 4.1) or researcher (2.8 vs 4), and their comfort with pain terminology(2.8 vs 3.9). CONCLUSIONS: With the PURE program, we wanted to entice top undergraduates to consider pain as a future area of study, practice, and/or research. We present a model that can be easily implemented at research universities throughout the United States.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4855323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48553232016-05-05 Summer undergraduate research: A new pipeline for pain clinical practice and research Kolber, Benedict J. Janjic, Jelena M. Pollock, John A. Tidgewell, Kevin J. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Most medical schools fail to provide adequate training of clinicians in the treatment of pain. Similarly, despite the fact that over 1/3 of Americans suffer from chronic pain, National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for pain represents only ~1 % of the NIH budget. These issues may dissuade students from pursing pain in their clinical and research careers. To address these gaps in training and funding, we argue that exposing students to pain science early in their careers, at the undergraduate level, may be an effective method to develop a pipeline for future pain clinicians and scientists. To highlight our argument, we will describe our recent successful implementation of a cross-disciplinary and community-engaged biomedical summer research program. The Pain Undergraduate Research Experience (PURE) summer program involved both off-site and on-site experiences to expose undergraduate students to the range of careers in the pain field from basic science to clinical practice. The objective of the 10-week long PURE program was to evaluate whether a combination of basic science research, clinical practice visits, and patient interactions would increase student understanding of and exposure to the underlying science of pain. METHODS: A pre-post cohort study was used without a comparison group. Entry and exit surveys were used to evaluate students’ perceptions about pain clinical practice and research, student interest in pain, and student confidence about communicating about pain and doing basic science pain research. RESULTS: Students reported significant increases to a number of questions in the survey. Questions were scored on 5 point Likert scales and there was significant increases in student understanding of what life is like with chronic pain (2.6 vs 4.3 post survey), their confidence in explaining pain to a patient (2.8 vs 4.1) or researcher (2.8 vs 4), and their comfort with pain terminology(2.8 vs 3.9). CONCLUSIONS: With the PURE program, we wanted to entice top undergraduates to consider pain as a future area of study, practice, and/or research. We present a model that can be easily implemented at research universities throughout the United States. BioMed Central 2016-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4855323/ /pubmed/27142616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0648-7 Text en © Kolber et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kolber, Benedict J.
Janjic, Jelena M.
Pollock, John A.
Tidgewell, Kevin J.
Summer undergraduate research: A new pipeline for pain clinical practice and research
title Summer undergraduate research: A new pipeline for pain clinical practice and research
title_full Summer undergraduate research: A new pipeline for pain clinical practice and research
title_fullStr Summer undergraduate research: A new pipeline for pain clinical practice and research
title_full_unstemmed Summer undergraduate research: A new pipeline for pain clinical practice and research
title_short Summer undergraduate research: A new pipeline for pain clinical practice and research
title_sort summer undergraduate research: a new pipeline for pain clinical practice and research
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27142616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0648-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kolberbenedictj summerundergraduateresearchanewpipelineforpainclinicalpracticeandresearch
AT janjicjelenam summerundergraduateresearchanewpipelineforpainclinicalpracticeandresearch
AT pollockjohna summerundergraduateresearchanewpipelineforpainclinicalpracticeandresearch
AT tidgewellkevinj summerundergraduateresearchanewpipelineforpainclinicalpracticeandresearch