Cargando…

Emergency right colectomy: which strategy when primary anastomosis is not feasible?

BACKGROUND: Primary anastomosis is considered the standard strategy after right emergency colectomy. The present study aimed to evaluate alternative treatment strategies when primary anastomosis is not possible to prevent definitive ostomy. METHODS: This retrospective study included all consecutive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teixeira Farinha, Hugo, Melloul, Emmanuel, Hahnloser, Dieter, Demartines, Nicolas, Hübner, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27148397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-016-0073-6
_version_ 1782430363997437952
author Teixeira Farinha, Hugo
Melloul, Emmanuel
Hahnloser, Dieter
Demartines, Nicolas
Hübner, Martin
author_facet Teixeira Farinha, Hugo
Melloul, Emmanuel
Hahnloser, Dieter
Demartines, Nicolas
Hübner, Martin
author_sort Teixeira Farinha, Hugo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Primary anastomosis is considered the standard strategy after right emergency colectomy. The present study aimed to evaluate alternative treatment strategies when primary anastomosis is not possible to prevent definitive ostomy. METHODS: This retrospective study included all consecutive patients who underwent right emergency colectomy between July 2006 and June 2013. Demographics, surgical data, and postoperative outcomes were entered in an anonymized database. Comparative analysis was performed between patients with primary anastomosis (PA group) and those where alternative strategies were employed (no-PA group). Outcomes were 30 days complications rate and rate of bowel continuity restoration. RESULTS: One hundred forty-eight patients (57 % male) with a median age of 65 years (15–96) were included. One hundred and sixteen patients underwent PA (78 %) and 32 were in the no-PA group (22 %). No-PA group patients had more comorbidities (Carlson comorbidity index >3: 98 % vs. 54, p < 0.001). Major complications rate (Dindo-Clavien III to IV) was 24 % in PA group, 88 % in no-PA group (p < 0.001). The 30-day mortality rate was 6 % (n = 7) in PA group versus 25 % (n = 8) in no-PA group (p = 0.004). Fourteen patients in the no-PA group had a split stoma and 18 had a two-staged procedure. Five patients had continuity restoration after initial split stoma (36 %) compared to 10 after a two-staged procedure (55 %; p = 0.265). Anastomotic leak occurred in 10 patients of the PA group (9 %) versus 0 in the no-PA group, where 15 out of 32 patients (47 %) had continuity restoration. CONCLUSION: Eighty percent of patients requiring emergency right colectomy were anastomosed primarily. For the remaining a two-staged procedure might facilitate bowel continuity restoration in the long-term.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4855428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48554282016-05-05 Emergency right colectomy: which strategy when primary anastomosis is not feasible? Teixeira Farinha, Hugo Melloul, Emmanuel Hahnloser, Dieter Demartines, Nicolas Hübner, Martin World J Emerg Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Primary anastomosis is considered the standard strategy after right emergency colectomy. The present study aimed to evaluate alternative treatment strategies when primary anastomosis is not possible to prevent definitive ostomy. METHODS: This retrospective study included all consecutive patients who underwent right emergency colectomy between July 2006 and June 2013. Demographics, surgical data, and postoperative outcomes were entered in an anonymized database. Comparative analysis was performed between patients with primary anastomosis (PA group) and those where alternative strategies were employed (no-PA group). Outcomes were 30 days complications rate and rate of bowel continuity restoration. RESULTS: One hundred forty-eight patients (57 % male) with a median age of 65 years (15–96) were included. One hundred and sixteen patients underwent PA (78 %) and 32 were in the no-PA group (22 %). No-PA group patients had more comorbidities (Carlson comorbidity index >3: 98 % vs. 54, p < 0.001). Major complications rate (Dindo-Clavien III to IV) was 24 % in PA group, 88 % in no-PA group (p < 0.001). The 30-day mortality rate was 6 % (n = 7) in PA group versus 25 % (n = 8) in no-PA group (p = 0.004). Fourteen patients in the no-PA group had a split stoma and 18 had a two-staged procedure. Five patients had continuity restoration after initial split stoma (36 %) compared to 10 after a two-staged procedure (55 %; p = 0.265). Anastomotic leak occurred in 10 patients of the PA group (9 %) versus 0 in the no-PA group, where 15 out of 32 patients (47 %) had continuity restoration. CONCLUSION: Eighty percent of patients requiring emergency right colectomy were anastomosed primarily. For the remaining a two-staged procedure might facilitate bowel continuity restoration in the long-term. BioMed Central 2016-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4855428/ /pubmed/27148397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-016-0073-6 Text en © Teixeira Farinha et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Teixeira Farinha, Hugo
Melloul, Emmanuel
Hahnloser, Dieter
Demartines, Nicolas
Hübner, Martin
Emergency right colectomy: which strategy when primary anastomosis is not feasible?
title Emergency right colectomy: which strategy when primary anastomosis is not feasible?
title_full Emergency right colectomy: which strategy when primary anastomosis is not feasible?
title_fullStr Emergency right colectomy: which strategy when primary anastomosis is not feasible?
title_full_unstemmed Emergency right colectomy: which strategy when primary anastomosis is not feasible?
title_short Emergency right colectomy: which strategy when primary anastomosis is not feasible?
title_sort emergency right colectomy: which strategy when primary anastomosis is not feasible?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27148397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-016-0073-6
work_keys_str_mv AT teixeirafarinhahugo emergencyrightcolectomywhichstrategywhenprimaryanastomosisisnotfeasible
AT melloulemmanuel emergencyrightcolectomywhichstrategywhenprimaryanastomosisisnotfeasible
AT hahnloserdieter emergencyrightcolectomywhichstrategywhenprimaryanastomosisisnotfeasible
AT demartinesnicolas emergencyrightcolectomywhichstrategywhenprimaryanastomosisisnotfeasible
AT hubnermartin emergencyrightcolectomywhichstrategywhenprimaryanastomosisisnotfeasible