Cargando…
Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have “fair” health?
The Health Behavior in School-aged Children is a cross-national study collecting data on social and health indicators on adolescents in 43 countries. The study provides comparable data on health behaviors and health outcomes through the use of a common protocol, which have been a back bone of the st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27142802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0469-8 |
_version_ | 1782430372810719232 |
---|---|
author | Schnohr, Christina W. Gobina, Inese Santos, Teresa Mazur, Joanna Alikasifuglu, Mujgan Välimaa, Raili Corell, Maria Hagquist, Curt Dalmasso, Paola Movseyan, Yeva Cavallo, Franco van Dorsselaer, Saskia Torsheim, Torbjørn |
author_facet | Schnohr, Christina W. Gobina, Inese Santos, Teresa Mazur, Joanna Alikasifuglu, Mujgan Välimaa, Raili Corell, Maria Hagquist, Curt Dalmasso, Paola Movseyan, Yeva Cavallo, Franco van Dorsselaer, Saskia Torsheim, Torbjørn |
author_sort | Schnohr, Christina W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Health Behavior in School-aged Children is a cross-national study collecting data on social and health indicators on adolescents in 43 countries. The study provides comparable data on health behaviors and health outcomes through the use of a common protocol, which have been a back bone of the study sine its initiation in 1983. Recent years, researchers within the study have noticed a questionable comparability on the widely used item on self-rated health. One of the four response categories to the item “Would you say your health is….?” showed particular variation, as the response category “Fair” varied from 20 % in Latvia and Moldova to 3–4 % in Bulgaria and Macedonia. A qualitative mini-survey of the back-translations showed that the response category “Fair” had a negative slant in 25 countries, a positive slant in 10 countries and was considered neutral in 9 countries. This finding indicates that there are what may be called semantic issues affecting comparability in international studies, since the same original word (in an English original) is interpreted differently across countries and cultures. The paper test and discuss a few possible explanations to this, however, only leaving to future studies to hold a cautious approach to international comparisons if working with the self-rated health item with four response categories. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4855487 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48554872016-05-05 Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have “fair” health? Schnohr, Christina W. Gobina, Inese Santos, Teresa Mazur, Joanna Alikasifuglu, Mujgan Välimaa, Raili Corell, Maria Hagquist, Curt Dalmasso, Paola Movseyan, Yeva Cavallo, Franco van Dorsselaer, Saskia Torsheim, Torbjørn Health Qual Life Outcomes Short Report The Health Behavior in School-aged Children is a cross-national study collecting data on social and health indicators on adolescents in 43 countries. The study provides comparable data on health behaviors and health outcomes through the use of a common protocol, which have been a back bone of the study sine its initiation in 1983. Recent years, researchers within the study have noticed a questionable comparability on the widely used item on self-rated health. One of the four response categories to the item “Would you say your health is….?” showed particular variation, as the response category “Fair” varied from 20 % in Latvia and Moldova to 3–4 % in Bulgaria and Macedonia. A qualitative mini-survey of the back-translations showed that the response category “Fair” had a negative slant in 25 countries, a positive slant in 10 countries and was considered neutral in 9 countries. This finding indicates that there are what may be called semantic issues affecting comparability in international studies, since the same original word (in an English original) is interpreted differently across countries and cultures. The paper test and discuss a few possible explanations to this, however, only leaving to future studies to hold a cautious approach to international comparisons if working with the self-rated health item with four response categories. BioMed Central 2016-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4855487/ /pubmed/27142802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0469-8 Text en © Schnohr et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Schnohr, Christina W. Gobina, Inese Santos, Teresa Mazur, Joanna Alikasifuglu, Mujgan Välimaa, Raili Corell, Maria Hagquist, Curt Dalmasso, Paola Movseyan, Yeva Cavallo, Franco van Dorsselaer, Saskia Torsheim, Torbjørn Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have “fair” health? |
title | Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have “fair” health? |
title_full | Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have “fair” health? |
title_fullStr | Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have “fair” health? |
title_full_unstemmed | Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have “fair” health? |
title_short | Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have “fair” health? |
title_sort | semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have “fair” health? |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27142802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0469-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schnohrchristinaw semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth AT gobinainese semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth AT santosteresa semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth AT mazurjoanna semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth AT alikasifuglumujgan semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth AT valimaaraili semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth AT corellmaria semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth AT hagquistcurt semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth AT dalmassopaola semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth AT movseyanyeva semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth AT cavallofranco semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth AT vandorsselaersaskia semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth AT torsheimtorbjørn semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth |