Cargando…

Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have “fair” health?

The Health Behavior in School-aged Children is a cross-national study collecting data on social and health indicators on adolescents in 43 countries. The study provides comparable data on health behaviors and health outcomes through the use of a common protocol, which have been a back bone of the st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schnohr, Christina W., Gobina, Inese, Santos, Teresa, Mazur, Joanna, Alikasifuglu, Mujgan, Välimaa, Raili, Corell, Maria, Hagquist, Curt, Dalmasso, Paola, Movseyan, Yeva, Cavallo, Franco, van Dorsselaer, Saskia, Torsheim, Torbjørn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27142802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0469-8
_version_ 1782430372810719232
author Schnohr, Christina W.
Gobina, Inese
Santos, Teresa
Mazur, Joanna
Alikasifuglu, Mujgan
Välimaa, Raili
Corell, Maria
Hagquist, Curt
Dalmasso, Paola
Movseyan, Yeva
Cavallo, Franco
van Dorsselaer, Saskia
Torsheim, Torbjørn
author_facet Schnohr, Christina W.
Gobina, Inese
Santos, Teresa
Mazur, Joanna
Alikasifuglu, Mujgan
Välimaa, Raili
Corell, Maria
Hagquist, Curt
Dalmasso, Paola
Movseyan, Yeva
Cavallo, Franco
van Dorsselaer, Saskia
Torsheim, Torbjørn
author_sort Schnohr, Christina W.
collection PubMed
description The Health Behavior in School-aged Children is a cross-national study collecting data on social and health indicators on adolescents in 43 countries. The study provides comparable data on health behaviors and health outcomes through the use of a common protocol, which have been a back bone of the study sine its initiation in 1983. Recent years, researchers within the study have noticed a questionable comparability on the widely used item on self-rated health. One of the four response categories to the item “Would you say your health is….?” showed particular variation, as the response category “Fair” varied from 20 % in Latvia and Moldova to 3–4 % in Bulgaria and Macedonia. A qualitative mini-survey of the back-translations showed that the response category “Fair” had a negative slant in 25 countries, a positive slant in 10 countries and was considered neutral in 9 countries. This finding indicates that there are what may be called semantic issues affecting comparability in international studies, since the same original word (in an English original) is interpreted differently across countries and cultures. The paper test and discuss a few possible explanations to this, however, only leaving to future studies to hold a cautious approach to international comparisons if working with the self-rated health item with four response categories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4855487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48554872016-05-05 Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have “fair” health? Schnohr, Christina W. Gobina, Inese Santos, Teresa Mazur, Joanna Alikasifuglu, Mujgan Välimaa, Raili Corell, Maria Hagquist, Curt Dalmasso, Paola Movseyan, Yeva Cavallo, Franco van Dorsselaer, Saskia Torsheim, Torbjørn Health Qual Life Outcomes Short Report The Health Behavior in School-aged Children is a cross-national study collecting data on social and health indicators on adolescents in 43 countries. The study provides comparable data on health behaviors and health outcomes through the use of a common protocol, which have been a back bone of the study sine its initiation in 1983. Recent years, researchers within the study have noticed a questionable comparability on the widely used item on self-rated health. One of the four response categories to the item “Would you say your health is….?” showed particular variation, as the response category “Fair” varied from 20 % in Latvia and Moldova to 3–4 % in Bulgaria and Macedonia. A qualitative mini-survey of the back-translations showed that the response category “Fair” had a negative slant in 25 countries, a positive slant in 10 countries and was considered neutral in 9 countries. This finding indicates that there are what may be called semantic issues affecting comparability in international studies, since the same original word (in an English original) is interpreted differently across countries and cultures. The paper test and discuss a few possible explanations to this, however, only leaving to future studies to hold a cautious approach to international comparisons if working with the self-rated health item with four response categories. BioMed Central 2016-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4855487/ /pubmed/27142802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0469-8 Text en © Schnohr et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Short Report
Schnohr, Christina W.
Gobina, Inese
Santos, Teresa
Mazur, Joanna
Alikasifuglu, Mujgan
Välimaa, Raili
Corell, Maria
Hagquist, Curt
Dalmasso, Paola
Movseyan, Yeva
Cavallo, Franco
van Dorsselaer, Saskia
Torsheim, Torbjørn
Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have “fair” health?
title Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have “fair” health?
title_full Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have “fair” health?
title_fullStr Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have “fair” health?
title_full_unstemmed Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have “fair” health?
title_short Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have “fair” health?
title_sort semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have “fair” health?
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27142802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0469-8
work_keys_str_mv AT schnohrchristinaw semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth
AT gobinainese semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth
AT santosteresa semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth
AT mazurjoanna semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth
AT alikasifuglumujgan semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth
AT valimaaraili semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth
AT corellmaria semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth
AT hagquistcurt semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth
AT dalmassopaola semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth
AT movseyanyeva semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth
AT cavallofranco semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth
AT vandorsselaersaskia semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth
AT torsheimtorbjørn semanticsbiasincrossnationalcomparativeanalysesisitgoodorbadtohavefairhealth