Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of intensive vs. guideline antiplatelet therapy in high‐risk patients with recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: rationale and design of the Triple Antiplatelets for Reducing Dependency after Ischaemic Stroke (TARDIS) trial (ISRCTN47823388)

RATIONALE: The risk of recurrence following a stroke or transient ischemic attack is high, especially immediately after the event. HYPOTHESIS: Because two antiplatelet agents are superior to one in patients with non‐cardioembolic events, more intensive treatment might be even more effective. SAMPLE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26079743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12538
_version_ 1782430385504780288
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: The risk of recurrence following a stroke or transient ischemic attack is high, especially immediately after the event. HYPOTHESIS: Because two antiplatelet agents are superior to one in patients with non‐cardioembolic events, more intensive treatment might be even more effective. SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATES: The sample size of 4100 patients will allow a shift to less recurrence, and less severe recurrence, to be detected (odds ratio 0·68) with 90% power at 5% significance. METHODS AND DESIGN: Triple Antiplatelets for Reducing Dependency after Ischaemic Stroke (ISRCTN47823388) is comparing the safety and efficacy of intensive (combined aspirin, clopidogrel, and dipyridamole) vs. guideline antiplatelet therapy, both given for one‐month. This international collaborative parallel‐group prospective randomized open‐label blinded‐end‐point phase III trial plans to recruit 4100 patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Randomization and data collection are performed over a secure Internet site with real‐time data validation and concealment of allocation. Outcomes, serious adverse events, and neuroimaging are adjudicated centrally with blinding to treatment allocation. STUDY OUTCOME: The primary outcome is stroke recurrence and its severity (‘ordinal recurrence’ based on modified Rankin Scale) at 90 days, with masked assessment centrally by telephone. Secondary outcomes include vascular events, functional measures (disability, mood, cognition, quality of life), and safety (bleeding, death, serious adverse events). DISCUSSION: The trial has recruited more than 50% of its target sample size (latest number: 2399) and is running in 104 sites in 4 countries. One‐third of patients presented with a transient ischemic attack.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4855643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48556432016-06-22 Safety and efficacy of intensive vs. guideline antiplatelet therapy in high‐risk patients with recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: rationale and design of the Triple Antiplatelets for Reducing Dependency after Ischaemic Stroke (TARDIS) trial (ISRCTN47823388) Int J Stroke Protocols RATIONALE: The risk of recurrence following a stroke or transient ischemic attack is high, especially immediately after the event. HYPOTHESIS: Because two antiplatelet agents are superior to one in patients with non‐cardioembolic events, more intensive treatment might be even more effective. SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATES: The sample size of 4100 patients will allow a shift to less recurrence, and less severe recurrence, to be detected (odds ratio 0·68) with 90% power at 5% significance. METHODS AND DESIGN: Triple Antiplatelets for Reducing Dependency after Ischaemic Stroke (ISRCTN47823388) is comparing the safety and efficacy of intensive (combined aspirin, clopidogrel, and dipyridamole) vs. guideline antiplatelet therapy, both given for one‐month. This international collaborative parallel‐group prospective randomized open‐label blinded‐end‐point phase III trial plans to recruit 4100 patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Randomization and data collection are performed over a secure Internet site with real‐time data validation and concealment of allocation. Outcomes, serious adverse events, and neuroimaging are adjudicated centrally with blinding to treatment allocation. STUDY OUTCOME: The primary outcome is stroke recurrence and its severity (‘ordinal recurrence’ based on modified Rankin Scale) at 90 days, with masked assessment centrally by telephone. Secondary outcomes include vascular events, functional measures (disability, mood, cognition, quality of life), and safety (bleeding, death, serious adverse events). DISCUSSION: The trial has recruited more than 50% of its target sample size (latest number: 2399) and is running in 104 sites in 4 countries. One‐third of patients presented with a transient ischemic attack. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-06-16 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4855643/ /pubmed/26079743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12538 Text en © 2015 The Author. International Journal of Stroke published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of World Stroke Organization. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Protocols
Safety and efficacy of intensive vs. guideline antiplatelet therapy in high‐risk patients with recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: rationale and design of the Triple Antiplatelets for Reducing Dependency after Ischaemic Stroke (TARDIS) trial (ISRCTN47823388)
title Safety and efficacy of intensive vs. guideline antiplatelet therapy in high‐risk patients with recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: rationale and design of the Triple Antiplatelets for Reducing Dependency after Ischaemic Stroke (TARDIS) trial (ISRCTN47823388)
title_full Safety and efficacy of intensive vs. guideline antiplatelet therapy in high‐risk patients with recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: rationale and design of the Triple Antiplatelets for Reducing Dependency after Ischaemic Stroke (TARDIS) trial (ISRCTN47823388)
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of intensive vs. guideline antiplatelet therapy in high‐risk patients with recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: rationale and design of the Triple Antiplatelets for Reducing Dependency after Ischaemic Stroke (TARDIS) trial (ISRCTN47823388)
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of intensive vs. guideline antiplatelet therapy in high‐risk patients with recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: rationale and design of the Triple Antiplatelets for Reducing Dependency after Ischaemic Stroke (TARDIS) trial (ISRCTN47823388)
title_short Safety and efficacy of intensive vs. guideline antiplatelet therapy in high‐risk patients with recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: rationale and design of the Triple Antiplatelets for Reducing Dependency after Ischaemic Stroke (TARDIS) trial (ISRCTN47823388)
title_sort safety and efficacy of intensive vs. guideline antiplatelet therapy in high‐risk patients with recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: rationale and design of the triple antiplatelets for reducing dependency after ischaemic stroke (tardis) trial (isrctn47823388)
topic Protocols
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26079743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12538
work_keys_str_mv AT safetyandefficacyofintensivevsguidelineantiplatelettherapyinhighriskpatientswithrecentischemicstrokeortransientischemicattackrationaleanddesignofthetripleantiplateletsforreducingdependencyafterischaemicstroketardistrialisrctn47823388