Cargando…

Transpapillary biliary biopsy for malignant biliary strictures: comparison between cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND: Tissue sampling for biliary stricture is important for differential diagnosis and further treatment. This study aims to assess the differences of transpapillary biliary biopsy for malignant biliary strictures between cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer. METHODS: From January 2010 to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Wei-Ming, Wei, Kuo-Liang, Chen, Yi-Shing, Chang, Pey-Jium, Tung, Shui-Yi, Chang, Te-Sheng, Huang, Hao-Chun, Shen, Chein-Heng, Hsieh, Yung-Yu, Wu, Cheng-Shyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27142076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0883-8
_version_ 1782430407297335296
author Chen, Wei-Ming
Wei, Kuo-Liang
Chen, Yi-Shing
Chang, Pey-Jium
Tung, Shui-Yi
Chang, Te-Sheng
Huang, Hao-Chun
Shen, Chein-Heng
Hsieh, Yung-Yu
Wu, Cheng-Shyong
author_facet Chen, Wei-Ming
Wei, Kuo-Liang
Chen, Yi-Shing
Chang, Pey-Jium
Tung, Shui-Yi
Chang, Te-Sheng
Huang, Hao-Chun
Shen, Chein-Heng
Hsieh, Yung-Yu
Wu, Cheng-Shyong
author_sort Chen, Wei-Ming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tissue sampling for biliary stricture is important for differential diagnosis and further treatment. This study aims to assess the differences of transpapillary biliary biopsy for malignant biliary strictures between cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer. METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2013, we retrospectively studied 79 patients who suffered from biliary strictures and received transpapillary forceps biopsy after sphincterotomy for tissue sampling. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of forceps biopsy were calculated in all cases for both cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer patients. Possible factors that distinguish malignant strictures from benign strictures and which could affect the accuracy of tissue sampling were analyzed. RESULTS: There are 65 malignant and 14 benign biliary stricture patients enrolled. The malignant group has a significantly higher serum bilirubin level than the benign group, but age, clinical presentation, level of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, and alkaline phosphatase are not. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of forceps biopsy for biliary stricture are 53.85, 100, 100, and 31.82 %, respectively. The cholangiocarcinoma group has a higher sensitivity (73.53 versus 29.17 %, p < 0.001), older age, lower CA 19-9 level, and more common hepatic duct strictures than the pancreatic group. The age, serum CEA, CA 19-9 and the alkaline phosphatase level, serum bilirubin level >10 mg/dL, tissue sampling ≧3 are not significant factors affecting diagnostic accuracy in forceps biopsy for pancreatobiliary strictures. There is neither major bleeding nor perforation in our study. CONCLUSIONS: Transpapillary forceps biopsy of biliary strictures after sphincterotomy for tissue sampling is safe and a significantly higher sensitive method in cholangiocarcinoma but not in pancreatic cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4855757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48557572016-05-05 Transpapillary biliary biopsy for malignant biliary strictures: comparison between cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer Chen, Wei-Ming Wei, Kuo-Liang Chen, Yi-Shing Chang, Pey-Jium Tung, Shui-Yi Chang, Te-Sheng Huang, Hao-Chun Shen, Chein-Heng Hsieh, Yung-Yu Wu, Cheng-Shyong World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Tissue sampling for biliary stricture is important for differential diagnosis and further treatment. This study aims to assess the differences of transpapillary biliary biopsy for malignant biliary strictures between cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer. METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2013, we retrospectively studied 79 patients who suffered from biliary strictures and received transpapillary forceps biopsy after sphincterotomy for tissue sampling. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of forceps biopsy were calculated in all cases for both cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer patients. Possible factors that distinguish malignant strictures from benign strictures and which could affect the accuracy of tissue sampling were analyzed. RESULTS: There are 65 malignant and 14 benign biliary stricture patients enrolled. The malignant group has a significantly higher serum bilirubin level than the benign group, but age, clinical presentation, level of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, and alkaline phosphatase are not. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of forceps biopsy for biliary stricture are 53.85, 100, 100, and 31.82 %, respectively. The cholangiocarcinoma group has a higher sensitivity (73.53 versus 29.17 %, p < 0.001), older age, lower CA 19-9 level, and more common hepatic duct strictures than the pancreatic group. The age, serum CEA, CA 19-9 and the alkaline phosphatase level, serum bilirubin level >10 mg/dL, tissue sampling ≧3 are not significant factors affecting diagnostic accuracy in forceps biopsy for pancreatobiliary strictures. There is neither major bleeding nor perforation in our study. CONCLUSIONS: Transpapillary forceps biopsy of biliary strictures after sphincterotomy for tissue sampling is safe and a significantly higher sensitive method in cholangiocarcinoma but not in pancreatic cancer. BioMed Central 2016-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4855757/ /pubmed/27142076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0883-8 Text en © Chen et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Chen, Wei-Ming
Wei, Kuo-Liang
Chen, Yi-Shing
Chang, Pey-Jium
Tung, Shui-Yi
Chang, Te-Sheng
Huang, Hao-Chun
Shen, Chein-Heng
Hsieh, Yung-Yu
Wu, Cheng-Shyong
Transpapillary biliary biopsy for malignant biliary strictures: comparison between cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer
title Transpapillary biliary biopsy for malignant biliary strictures: comparison between cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer
title_full Transpapillary biliary biopsy for malignant biliary strictures: comparison between cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer
title_fullStr Transpapillary biliary biopsy for malignant biliary strictures: comparison between cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer
title_full_unstemmed Transpapillary biliary biopsy for malignant biliary strictures: comparison between cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer
title_short Transpapillary biliary biopsy for malignant biliary strictures: comparison between cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer
title_sort transpapillary biliary biopsy for malignant biliary strictures: comparison between cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27142076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0883-8
work_keys_str_mv AT chenweiming transpapillarybiliarybiopsyformalignantbiliarystricturescomparisonbetweencholangiocarcinomaandpancreaticcancer
AT weikuoliang transpapillarybiliarybiopsyformalignantbiliarystricturescomparisonbetweencholangiocarcinomaandpancreaticcancer
AT chenyishing transpapillarybiliarybiopsyformalignantbiliarystricturescomparisonbetweencholangiocarcinomaandpancreaticcancer
AT changpeyjium transpapillarybiliarybiopsyformalignantbiliarystricturescomparisonbetweencholangiocarcinomaandpancreaticcancer
AT tungshuiyi transpapillarybiliarybiopsyformalignantbiliarystricturescomparisonbetweencholangiocarcinomaandpancreaticcancer
AT changtesheng transpapillarybiliarybiopsyformalignantbiliarystricturescomparisonbetweencholangiocarcinomaandpancreaticcancer
AT huanghaochun transpapillarybiliarybiopsyformalignantbiliarystricturescomparisonbetweencholangiocarcinomaandpancreaticcancer
AT shencheinheng transpapillarybiliarybiopsyformalignantbiliarystricturescomparisonbetweencholangiocarcinomaandpancreaticcancer
AT hsiehyungyu transpapillarybiliarybiopsyformalignantbiliarystricturescomparisonbetweencholangiocarcinomaandpancreaticcancer
AT wuchengshyong transpapillarybiliarybiopsyformalignantbiliarystricturescomparisonbetweencholangiocarcinomaandpancreaticcancer