Cargando…

After low and high dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy followed by IMRT radiotherapy for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to compare urinary symptoms in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer after a combination of either low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy along with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (LDR-ISBT + IMRT or HDR-ISBT + IMRT). METHODS: From...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakamura, Satoshi, Murakami, Naoya, Inaba, Koji, Wakita, Akihisa, Kobayashi, Kazuma, Takahashi, Kana, Okamoto, Hiroyuki, Umezawa, Rei, Morota, Madoka, Sumi, Minako, Igaki, Hiroshi, Ito, Yoshinori, Itami, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27142069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2329-7
_version_ 1782430418305286144
author Nakamura, Satoshi
Murakami, Naoya
Inaba, Koji
Wakita, Akihisa
Kobayashi, Kazuma
Takahashi, Kana
Okamoto, Hiroyuki
Umezawa, Rei
Morota, Madoka
Sumi, Minako
Igaki, Hiroshi
Ito, Yoshinori
Itami, Jun
author_facet Nakamura, Satoshi
Murakami, Naoya
Inaba, Koji
Wakita, Akihisa
Kobayashi, Kazuma
Takahashi, Kana
Okamoto, Hiroyuki
Umezawa, Rei
Morota, Madoka
Sumi, Minako
Igaki, Hiroshi
Ito, Yoshinori
Itami, Jun
author_sort Nakamura, Satoshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The study aimed to compare urinary symptoms in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer after a combination of either low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy along with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (LDR-ISBT + IMRT or HDR-ISBT + IMRT). METHODS: From June 2009 to April 2014, 16 and 22 patients were treated with LDR-ISBT + IMRT and HDR-ISBT + IMRT, respectively. No patient from these groups was excluded from this study. The prescribed dose of LDR-ISBT, HDR-ISBT, and IMRT was 115 Gy, 20 Gy in 2 fractions, and 46 Gy in 23 fractions, respectively. Obstructive and irritative urinary symptoms were assessed by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) examined before and after treatments. After ISBT, IPSS was evaluated in the 1st and 4th weeks, then every 2–3 months for the 1st year, and every 6 months thereafter. RESULTS: The median follow-up of the patients treated with LDR-ISBT + IMRT and HDR-ISBT + IMRT was 1070.5 days and 1048.5 days, respectively (p = 0.321). The IPSS-increment in the LDR-ISBT + IMRT group was greater than that in the HDR-ISBT + IMRT between 91 and 180 days after ISBT (p = 0.015). In the LDR-ISBT + IMRT group, the IPSS took longer time to return to the initial level than in the HDR-ISBT + IMRT group (in LDR-ISBT + IMRT group, the recovery time was 90 days later). The dose to urethra showed a statistically significant association with the IPSS-increment in the irritative urinary symptoms (p = 0.011). Clinical outcomes were comparable between both the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both therapeutic modalities are safe and well suited for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer; however, it took patients longer to recover from LDR-ISBT + IMRT than from HDR-ISBT + IMRT. It is possible that fast dose delivery induced early symptoms and early recovery, while gradual dose delivery induced late symptoms and late recovery. Urethral dose reductions were associated with small increments in IPSS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4855811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48558112016-05-05 After low and high dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy followed by IMRT radiotherapy for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer Nakamura, Satoshi Murakami, Naoya Inaba, Koji Wakita, Akihisa Kobayashi, Kazuma Takahashi, Kana Okamoto, Hiroyuki Umezawa, Rei Morota, Madoka Sumi, Minako Igaki, Hiroshi Ito, Yoshinori Itami, Jun BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The study aimed to compare urinary symptoms in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer after a combination of either low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy along with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (LDR-ISBT + IMRT or HDR-ISBT + IMRT). METHODS: From June 2009 to April 2014, 16 and 22 patients were treated with LDR-ISBT + IMRT and HDR-ISBT + IMRT, respectively. No patient from these groups was excluded from this study. The prescribed dose of LDR-ISBT, HDR-ISBT, and IMRT was 115 Gy, 20 Gy in 2 fractions, and 46 Gy in 23 fractions, respectively. Obstructive and irritative urinary symptoms were assessed by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) examined before and after treatments. After ISBT, IPSS was evaluated in the 1st and 4th weeks, then every 2–3 months for the 1st year, and every 6 months thereafter. RESULTS: The median follow-up of the patients treated with LDR-ISBT + IMRT and HDR-ISBT + IMRT was 1070.5 days and 1048.5 days, respectively (p = 0.321). The IPSS-increment in the LDR-ISBT + IMRT group was greater than that in the HDR-ISBT + IMRT between 91 and 180 days after ISBT (p = 0.015). In the LDR-ISBT + IMRT group, the IPSS took longer time to return to the initial level than in the HDR-ISBT + IMRT group (in LDR-ISBT + IMRT group, the recovery time was 90 days later). The dose to urethra showed a statistically significant association with the IPSS-increment in the irritative urinary symptoms (p = 0.011). Clinical outcomes were comparable between both the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both therapeutic modalities are safe and well suited for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer; however, it took patients longer to recover from LDR-ISBT + IMRT than from HDR-ISBT + IMRT. It is possible that fast dose delivery induced early symptoms and early recovery, while gradual dose delivery induced late symptoms and late recovery. Urethral dose reductions were associated with small increments in IPSS. BioMed Central 2016-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4855811/ /pubmed/27142069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2329-7 Text en © Nakamura et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nakamura, Satoshi
Murakami, Naoya
Inaba, Koji
Wakita, Akihisa
Kobayashi, Kazuma
Takahashi, Kana
Okamoto, Hiroyuki
Umezawa, Rei
Morota, Madoka
Sumi, Minako
Igaki, Hiroshi
Ito, Yoshinori
Itami, Jun
After low and high dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy followed by IMRT radiotherapy for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer
title After low and high dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy followed by IMRT radiotherapy for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer
title_full After low and high dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy followed by IMRT radiotherapy for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer
title_fullStr After low and high dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy followed by IMRT radiotherapy for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed After low and high dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy followed by IMRT radiotherapy for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer
title_short After low and high dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy followed by IMRT radiotherapy for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer
title_sort after low and high dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy followed by imrt radiotherapy for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27142069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2329-7
work_keys_str_mv AT nakamurasatoshi afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer
AT murakaminaoya afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer
AT inabakoji afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer
AT wakitaakihisa afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer
AT kobayashikazuma afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer
AT takahashikana afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer
AT okamotohiroyuki afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer
AT umezawarei afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer
AT morotamadoka afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer
AT sumiminako afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer
AT igakihiroshi afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer
AT itoyoshinori afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer
AT itamijun afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer