Cargando…
After low and high dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy followed by IMRT radiotherapy for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer
BACKGROUND: The study aimed to compare urinary symptoms in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer after a combination of either low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy along with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (LDR-ISBT + IMRT or HDR-ISBT + IMRT). METHODS: From...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27142069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2329-7 |
_version_ | 1782430418305286144 |
---|---|
author | Nakamura, Satoshi Murakami, Naoya Inaba, Koji Wakita, Akihisa Kobayashi, Kazuma Takahashi, Kana Okamoto, Hiroyuki Umezawa, Rei Morota, Madoka Sumi, Minako Igaki, Hiroshi Ito, Yoshinori Itami, Jun |
author_facet | Nakamura, Satoshi Murakami, Naoya Inaba, Koji Wakita, Akihisa Kobayashi, Kazuma Takahashi, Kana Okamoto, Hiroyuki Umezawa, Rei Morota, Madoka Sumi, Minako Igaki, Hiroshi Ito, Yoshinori Itami, Jun |
author_sort | Nakamura, Satoshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The study aimed to compare urinary symptoms in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer after a combination of either low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy along with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (LDR-ISBT + IMRT or HDR-ISBT + IMRT). METHODS: From June 2009 to April 2014, 16 and 22 patients were treated with LDR-ISBT + IMRT and HDR-ISBT + IMRT, respectively. No patient from these groups was excluded from this study. The prescribed dose of LDR-ISBT, HDR-ISBT, and IMRT was 115 Gy, 20 Gy in 2 fractions, and 46 Gy in 23 fractions, respectively. Obstructive and irritative urinary symptoms were assessed by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) examined before and after treatments. After ISBT, IPSS was evaluated in the 1st and 4th weeks, then every 2–3 months for the 1st year, and every 6 months thereafter. RESULTS: The median follow-up of the patients treated with LDR-ISBT + IMRT and HDR-ISBT + IMRT was 1070.5 days and 1048.5 days, respectively (p = 0.321). The IPSS-increment in the LDR-ISBT + IMRT group was greater than that in the HDR-ISBT + IMRT between 91 and 180 days after ISBT (p = 0.015). In the LDR-ISBT + IMRT group, the IPSS took longer time to return to the initial level than in the HDR-ISBT + IMRT group (in LDR-ISBT + IMRT group, the recovery time was 90 days later). The dose to urethra showed a statistically significant association with the IPSS-increment in the irritative urinary symptoms (p = 0.011). Clinical outcomes were comparable between both the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both therapeutic modalities are safe and well suited for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer; however, it took patients longer to recover from LDR-ISBT + IMRT than from HDR-ISBT + IMRT. It is possible that fast dose delivery induced early symptoms and early recovery, while gradual dose delivery induced late symptoms and late recovery. Urethral dose reductions were associated with small increments in IPSS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4855811 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48558112016-05-05 After low and high dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy followed by IMRT radiotherapy for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer Nakamura, Satoshi Murakami, Naoya Inaba, Koji Wakita, Akihisa Kobayashi, Kazuma Takahashi, Kana Okamoto, Hiroyuki Umezawa, Rei Morota, Madoka Sumi, Minako Igaki, Hiroshi Ito, Yoshinori Itami, Jun BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The study aimed to compare urinary symptoms in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer after a combination of either low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy along with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (LDR-ISBT + IMRT or HDR-ISBT + IMRT). METHODS: From June 2009 to April 2014, 16 and 22 patients were treated with LDR-ISBT + IMRT and HDR-ISBT + IMRT, respectively. No patient from these groups was excluded from this study. The prescribed dose of LDR-ISBT, HDR-ISBT, and IMRT was 115 Gy, 20 Gy in 2 fractions, and 46 Gy in 23 fractions, respectively. Obstructive and irritative urinary symptoms were assessed by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) examined before and after treatments. After ISBT, IPSS was evaluated in the 1st and 4th weeks, then every 2–3 months for the 1st year, and every 6 months thereafter. RESULTS: The median follow-up of the patients treated with LDR-ISBT + IMRT and HDR-ISBT + IMRT was 1070.5 days and 1048.5 days, respectively (p = 0.321). The IPSS-increment in the LDR-ISBT + IMRT group was greater than that in the HDR-ISBT + IMRT between 91 and 180 days after ISBT (p = 0.015). In the LDR-ISBT + IMRT group, the IPSS took longer time to return to the initial level than in the HDR-ISBT + IMRT group (in LDR-ISBT + IMRT group, the recovery time was 90 days later). The dose to urethra showed a statistically significant association with the IPSS-increment in the irritative urinary symptoms (p = 0.011). Clinical outcomes were comparable between both the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both therapeutic modalities are safe and well suited for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer; however, it took patients longer to recover from LDR-ISBT + IMRT than from HDR-ISBT + IMRT. It is possible that fast dose delivery induced early symptoms and early recovery, while gradual dose delivery induced late symptoms and late recovery. Urethral dose reductions were associated with small increments in IPSS. BioMed Central 2016-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4855811/ /pubmed/27142069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2329-7 Text en © Nakamura et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nakamura, Satoshi Murakami, Naoya Inaba, Koji Wakita, Akihisa Kobayashi, Kazuma Takahashi, Kana Okamoto, Hiroyuki Umezawa, Rei Morota, Madoka Sumi, Minako Igaki, Hiroshi Ito, Yoshinori Itami, Jun After low and high dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy followed by IMRT radiotherapy for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer |
title | After low and high dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy followed by IMRT radiotherapy for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer |
title_full | After low and high dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy followed by IMRT radiotherapy for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | After low and high dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy followed by IMRT radiotherapy for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | After low and high dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy followed by IMRT radiotherapy for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer |
title_short | After low and high dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy followed by IMRT radiotherapy for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer |
title_sort | after low and high dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy followed by imrt radiotherapy for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27142069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2329-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakamurasatoshi afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer AT murakaminaoya afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer AT inabakoji afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer AT wakitaakihisa afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer AT kobayashikazuma afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer AT takahashikana afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer AT okamotohiroyuki afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer AT umezawarei afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer AT morotamadoka afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer AT sumiminako afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer AT igakihiroshi afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer AT itoyoshinori afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer AT itamijun afterlowandhighdoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyfollowedbyimrtradiotherapyforintermediateandhighriskprostatecancer |