Cargando…

Cognitive load and autonomic response patterns under negative priming demand in depersonalization‐derealization disorder

Previous studies have yielded evidence for cognitive processing abnormalities and alterations of autonomic functioning in depersonalization‐derealization disorder (DPRD). However, multimodal neuroimaging and psychophysiology studies have not yet been conducted to test for functional and effective co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lemche, Erwin, Sierra‐Siegert, Mauricio, David, Anthony S., Phillips, Mary L., Gasston, David, Williams, Steven C.R., Giampietro, Vincent P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26791018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13183
_version_ 1782430437954551808
author Lemche, Erwin
Sierra‐Siegert, Mauricio
David, Anthony S.
Phillips, Mary L.
Gasston, David
Williams, Steven C.R.
Giampietro, Vincent P.
author_facet Lemche, Erwin
Sierra‐Siegert, Mauricio
David, Anthony S.
Phillips, Mary L.
Gasston, David
Williams, Steven C.R.
Giampietro, Vincent P.
author_sort Lemche, Erwin
collection PubMed
description Previous studies have yielded evidence for cognitive processing abnormalities and alterations of autonomic functioning in depersonalization‐derealization disorder (DPRD). However, multimodal neuroimaging and psychophysiology studies have not yet been conducted to test for functional and effective connectivity under cognitive stress in patients with DPRD. DPRD and non‐referred control subjects underwent a combined Stroop/negative priming task, and the neural correlates of Stroop interference effect, negative priming effect, error rates, cognitive load span and average amplitude of skin conductance responses were ascertained for both groups. Evoked haemodynamic responses for basic Stroop/negative priming activations were compared. For basic Stroop to neutral contrast, patients with DPRD differed in the location (inferior vs. superior lobule) of the parietal region involved, but showed similar activations in the left frontal region. In addition, patients with DPRD also co‐activated the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (BA9) and posterior cingulate cortex (BA31), which were also found to be the main between‐group difference regions. These regions furthermore showed connectivity with frequency of depersonalization states. Evoked haemodynamic responses drawn from regions of interest indicated significant between‐group differences in 30–40% of time points. Brain‐behaviour correlations differed mainly in laterality, yet only slightly in regions. A reversal of autonomic patterning became evident in patients with DPRD for cognitive load spans, indicating less effective arousal suppression under cognitive stress – patients with DPRD showed positive associations of cognitive load with autonomic responses, whereas controls exhibit respective inverse association. Overall, the results of the present study show only minor executive cognitive peculiarities, but further support the notion of abnormalities in autonomic functioning in patients with DPRD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4855951
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48559512016-06-22 Cognitive load and autonomic response patterns under negative priming demand in depersonalization‐derealization disorder Lemche, Erwin Sierra‐Siegert, Mauricio David, Anthony S. Phillips, Mary L. Gasston, David Williams, Steven C.R. Giampietro, Vincent P. Eur J Neurosci Cognitive Neuroscience Previous studies have yielded evidence for cognitive processing abnormalities and alterations of autonomic functioning in depersonalization‐derealization disorder (DPRD). However, multimodal neuroimaging and psychophysiology studies have not yet been conducted to test for functional and effective connectivity under cognitive stress in patients with DPRD. DPRD and non‐referred control subjects underwent a combined Stroop/negative priming task, and the neural correlates of Stroop interference effect, negative priming effect, error rates, cognitive load span and average amplitude of skin conductance responses were ascertained for both groups. Evoked haemodynamic responses for basic Stroop/negative priming activations were compared. For basic Stroop to neutral contrast, patients with DPRD differed in the location (inferior vs. superior lobule) of the parietal region involved, but showed similar activations in the left frontal region. In addition, patients with DPRD also co‐activated the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (BA9) and posterior cingulate cortex (BA31), which were also found to be the main between‐group difference regions. These regions furthermore showed connectivity with frequency of depersonalization states. Evoked haemodynamic responses drawn from regions of interest indicated significant between‐group differences in 30–40% of time points. Brain‐behaviour correlations differed mainly in laterality, yet only slightly in regions. A reversal of autonomic patterning became evident in patients with DPRD for cognitive load spans, indicating less effective arousal suppression under cognitive stress – patients with DPRD showed positive associations of cognitive load with autonomic responses, whereas controls exhibit respective inverse association. Overall, the results of the present study show only minor executive cognitive peculiarities, but further support the notion of abnormalities in autonomic functioning in patients with DPRD. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-02-15 2016-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4855951/ /pubmed/26791018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13183 Text en © 2016 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cognitive Neuroscience
Lemche, Erwin
Sierra‐Siegert, Mauricio
David, Anthony S.
Phillips, Mary L.
Gasston, David
Williams, Steven C.R.
Giampietro, Vincent P.
Cognitive load and autonomic response patterns under negative priming demand in depersonalization‐derealization disorder
title Cognitive load and autonomic response patterns under negative priming demand in depersonalization‐derealization disorder
title_full Cognitive load and autonomic response patterns under negative priming demand in depersonalization‐derealization disorder
title_fullStr Cognitive load and autonomic response patterns under negative priming demand in depersonalization‐derealization disorder
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive load and autonomic response patterns under negative priming demand in depersonalization‐derealization disorder
title_short Cognitive load and autonomic response patterns under negative priming demand in depersonalization‐derealization disorder
title_sort cognitive load and autonomic response patterns under negative priming demand in depersonalization‐derealization disorder
topic Cognitive Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26791018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13183
work_keys_str_mv AT lemcheerwin cognitiveloadandautonomicresponsepatternsundernegativeprimingdemandindepersonalizationderealizationdisorder
AT sierrasiegertmauricio cognitiveloadandautonomicresponsepatternsundernegativeprimingdemandindepersonalizationderealizationdisorder
AT davidanthonys cognitiveloadandautonomicresponsepatternsundernegativeprimingdemandindepersonalizationderealizationdisorder
AT phillipsmaryl cognitiveloadandautonomicresponsepatternsundernegativeprimingdemandindepersonalizationderealizationdisorder
AT gasstondavid cognitiveloadandautonomicresponsepatternsundernegativeprimingdemandindepersonalizationderealizationdisorder
AT williamsstevencr cognitiveloadandautonomicresponsepatternsundernegativeprimingdemandindepersonalizationderealizationdisorder
AT giampietrovincentp cognitiveloadandautonomicresponsepatternsundernegativeprimingdemandindepersonalizationderealizationdisorder