Cargando…

Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials

Genomic selection in crop breeding introduces modeling challenges not found in animal studies. These include the need to accommodate replicate plants for each line, consider spatial variation in field trials, address line by environment interactions, and capture nonadditive effects. Here, we propose...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oakey, Helena, Cullis, Brian, Thompson, Robin, Comadran, Jordi, Halpin, Claire, Waugh, Robbie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Genetics Society of America 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4856083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26976443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.027524
_version_ 1782430454226354176
author Oakey, Helena
Cullis, Brian
Thompson, Robin
Comadran, Jordi
Halpin, Claire
Waugh, Robbie
author_facet Oakey, Helena
Cullis, Brian
Thompson, Robin
Comadran, Jordi
Halpin, Claire
Waugh, Robbie
author_sort Oakey, Helena
collection PubMed
description Genomic selection in crop breeding introduces modeling challenges not found in animal studies. These include the need to accommodate replicate plants for each line, consider spatial variation in field trials, address line by environment interactions, and capture nonadditive effects. Here, we propose a flexible single-stage genomic selection approach that resolves these issues. Our linear mixed model incorporates spatial variation through environment-specific terms, and also randomization-based design terms. It considers marker, and marker by environment interactions using ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction to extend genomic selection to multiple environments. Since the approach uses the raw data from line replicates, the line genetic variation is partitioned into marker and nonmarker residual genetic variation (i.e., additive and nonadditive effects). This results in a more precise estimate of marker genetic effects. Using barley height data from trials, in 2 different years, of up to 477 cultivars, we demonstrate that our new genomic selection model improves predictions compared to current models. Analyzing single trials revealed improvements in predictive ability of up to 5.7%. For the multiple environment trial (MET) model, combining both year trials improved predictive ability up to 11.4% compared to a single environment analysis. Benefits were significant even when fewer markers were used. Compared to a single-year standard model run with 3490 markers, our partitioned MET model achieved the same predictive ability using between 500 and 1000 markers depending on the trial. Our approach can be used to increase accuracy and confidence in the selection of the best lines for breeding and/or, to reduce costs by using fewer markers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4856083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Genetics Society of America
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48560832016-05-05 Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials Oakey, Helena Cullis, Brian Thompson, Robin Comadran, Jordi Halpin, Claire Waugh, Robbie G3 (Bethesda) Genomic Selection Genomic selection in crop breeding introduces modeling challenges not found in animal studies. These include the need to accommodate replicate plants for each line, consider spatial variation in field trials, address line by environment interactions, and capture nonadditive effects. Here, we propose a flexible single-stage genomic selection approach that resolves these issues. Our linear mixed model incorporates spatial variation through environment-specific terms, and also randomization-based design terms. It considers marker, and marker by environment interactions using ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction to extend genomic selection to multiple environments. Since the approach uses the raw data from line replicates, the line genetic variation is partitioned into marker and nonmarker residual genetic variation (i.e., additive and nonadditive effects). This results in a more precise estimate of marker genetic effects. Using barley height data from trials, in 2 different years, of up to 477 cultivars, we demonstrate that our new genomic selection model improves predictions compared to current models. Analyzing single trials revealed improvements in predictive ability of up to 5.7%. For the multiple environment trial (MET) model, combining both year trials improved predictive ability up to 11.4% compared to a single environment analysis. Benefits were significant even when fewer markers were used. Compared to a single-year standard model run with 3490 markers, our partitioned MET model achieved the same predictive ability using between 500 and 1000 markers depending on the trial. Our approach can be used to increase accuracy and confidence in the selection of the best lines for breeding and/or, to reduce costs by using fewer markers. Genetics Society of America 2016-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4856083/ /pubmed/26976443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.027524 Text en Copyright © 2016 Oakey et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Genomic Selection
Oakey, Helena
Cullis, Brian
Thompson, Robin
Comadran, Jordi
Halpin, Claire
Waugh, Robbie
Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials
title Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials
title_full Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials
title_fullStr Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials
title_full_unstemmed Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials
title_short Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials
title_sort genomic selection in multi-environment crop trials
topic Genomic Selection
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4856083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26976443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.027524
work_keys_str_mv AT oakeyhelena genomicselectioninmultienvironmentcroptrials
AT cullisbrian genomicselectioninmultienvironmentcroptrials
AT thompsonrobin genomicselectioninmultienvironmentcroptrials
AT comadranjordi genomicselectioninmultienvironmentcroptrials
AT halpinclaire genomicselectioninmultienvironmentcroptrials
AT waughrobbie genomicselectioninmultienvironmentcroptrials