Cargando…
Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials
Genomic selection in crop breeding introduces modeling challenges not found in animal studies. These include the need to accommodate replicate plants for each line, consider spatial variation in field trials, address line by environment interactions, and capture nonadditive effects. Here, we propose...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Genetics Society of America
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4856083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26976443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.027524 |
_version_ | 1782430454226354176 |
---|---|
author | Oakey, Helena Cullis, Brian Thompson, Robin Comadran, Jordi Halpin, Claire Waugh, Robbie |
author_facet | Oakey, Helena Cullis, Brian Thompson, Robin Comadran, Jordi Halpin, Claire Waugh, Robbie |
author_sort | Oakey, Helena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genomic selection in crop breeding introduces modeling challenges not found in animal studies. These include the need to accommodate replicate plants for each line, consider spatial variation in field trials, address line by environment interactions, and capture nonadditive effects. Here, we propose a flexible single-stage genomic selection approach that resolves these issues. Our linear mixed model incorporates spatial variation through environment-specific terms, and also randomization-based design terms. It considers marker, and marker by environment interactions using ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction to extend genomic selection to multiple environments. Since the approach uses the raw data from line replicates, the line genetic variation is partitioned into marker and nonmarker residual genetic variation (i.e., additive and nonadditive effects). This results in a more precise estimate of marker genetic effects. Using barley height data from trials, in 2 different years, of up to 477 cultivars, we demonstrate that our new genomic selection model improves predictions compared to current models. Analyzing single trials revealed improvements in predictive ability of up to 5.7%. For the multiple environment trial (MET) model, combining both year trials improved predictive ability up to 11.4% compared to a single environment analysis. Benefits were significant even when fewer markers were used. Compared to a single-year standard model run with 3490 markers, our partitioned MET model achieved the same predictive ability using between 500 and 1000 markers depending on the trial. Our approach can be used to increase accuracy and confidence in the selection of the best lines for breeding and/or, to reduce costs by using fewer markers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4856083 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Genetics Society of America |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48560832016-05-05 Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials Oakey, Helena Cullis, Brian Thompson, Robin Comadran, Jordi Halpin, Claire Waugh, Robbie G3 (Bethesda) Genomic Selection Genomic selection in crop breeding introduces modeling challenges not found in animal studies. These include the need to accommodate replicate plants for each line, consider spatial variation in field trials, address line by environment interactions, and capture nonadditive effects. Here, we propose a flexible single-stage genomic selection approach that resolves these issues. Our linear mixed model incorporates spatial variation through environment-specific terms, and also randomization-based design terms. It considers marker, and marker by environment interactions using ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction to extend genomic selection to multiple environments. Since the approach uses the raw data from line replicates, the line genetic variation is partitioned into marker and nonmarker residual genetic variation (i.e., additive and nonadditive effects). This results in a more precise estimate of marker genetic effects. Using barley height data from trials, in 2 different years, of up to 477 cultivars, we demonstrate that our new genomic selection model improves predictions compared to current models. Analyzing single trials revealed improvements in predictive ability of up to 5.7%. For the multiple environment trial (MET) model, combining both year trials improved predictive ability up to 11.4% compared to a single environment analysis. Benefits were significant even when fewer markers were used. Compared to a single-year standard model run with 3490 markers, our partitioned MET model achieved the same predictive ability using between 500 and 1000 markers depending on the trial. Our approach can be used to increase accuracy and confidence in the selection of the best lines for breeding and/or, to reduce costs by using fewer markers. Genetics Society of America 2016-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4856083/ /pubmed/26976443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.027524 Text en Copyright © 2016 Oakey et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Genomic Selection Oakey, Helena Cullis, Brian Thompson, Robin Comadran, Jordi Halpin, Claire Waugh, Robbie Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials |
title | Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials |
title_full | Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials |
title_fullStr | Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials |
title_short | Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials |
title_sort | genomic selection in multi-environment crop trials |
topic | Genomic Selection |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4856083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26976443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.027524 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oakeyhelena genomicselectioninmultienvironmentcroptrials AT cullisbrian genomicselectioninmultienvironmentcroptrials AT thompsonrobin genomicselectioninmultienvironmentcroptrials AT comadranjordi genomicselectioninmultienvironmentcroptrials AT halpinclaire genomicselectioninmultienvironmentcroptrials AT waughrobbie genomicselectioninmultienvironmentcroptrials |