Cargando…
Once-daily maraviroc versus tenofovir/emtricitabine each combined with darunavir/ritonavir for initial HIV-1 treatment
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of maraviroc along with darunavir/ritonavir, all once daily, for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 infected individuals. DESIGN: MODERN was a multicentre, double-blind, noninferiority, phase III study in HIV-1 infected, antiretr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4856180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26854810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001058 |
_version_ | 1782430463215796224 |
---|---|
author | Stellbrink, Hans-Jürgen Le Fevre, Eric Carr, Andrew Saag, Michael S. Mukwaya, Geoffrey Nozza, Silvia Valluri, Srinivas Rao Vourvahis, Manoli Rinehart, Alex R. McFadyen, Lynn Fichtenbaum, Carl Clark, Andrew Craig, Charles Fang, Annie F. Heera, Jayvant |
author_facet | Stellbrink, Hans-Jürgen Le Fevre, Eric Carr, Andrew Saag, Michael S. Mukwaya, Geoffrey Nozza, Silvia Valluri, Srinivas Rao Vourvahis, Manoli Rinehart, Alex R. McFadyen, Lynn Fichtenbaum, Carl Clark, Andrew Craig, Charles Fang, Annie F. Heera, Jayvant |
author_sort | Stellbrink, Hans-Jürgen |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of maraviroc along with darunavir/ritonavir, all once daily, for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 infected individuals. DESIGN: MODERN was a multicentre, double-blind, noninferiority, phase III study in HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral-naive adults with plasma HIV-1 RNA at least 1000 copies/ml and no evidence of reduced susceptibility to study drugs. METHODS: At screening, participants were randomized 1 : 1 to undergo either genotypic or phenotypic tropism testing. Participants with CCR5-tropic HIV-1 were randomized 1 : 1 to receive maraviroc 150 mg once daily or tenofovir/emtricitabine once daily each with darunavir/ritonavir once daily for 96 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml (Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm) at Week 48. A substudy evaluated bone mineral density, body fat distribution and serum bone turnover markers. RESULTS: Seven hundred and ninety-seven participants were dosed (maraviroc, n = 396; tenofovir/emtricitabine, n = 401). The Data Monitoring Committee recommended early study termination due to inferior efficacy in the maraviroc group. At Week 48, the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml was 77.3% for maraviroc and 86.8% for tenofovir/emtricitabine [difference of −9.54% (95% confidence interval: −14.83 to −4.24)]. More maraviroc participants discontinued for lack of efficacy, which was not associated with non-R5 tropism or resistance. Discontinuations for adverse events, Category C events, Grade 3/4 adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: A once-daily nucleos(t)ide-sparing two-drug regimen of maraviroc and darunavir/ritonavir was inferior to a three-drug regimen of tenofovir/emtricitabine and darunavir/ritonavir in antiretroviral-naive adults. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4856180 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48561802016-05-23 Once-daily maraviroc versus tenofovir/emtricitabine each combined with darunavir/ritonavir for initial HIV-1 treatment Stellbrink, Hans-Jürgen Le Fevre, Eric Carr, Andrew Saag, Michael S. Mukwaya, Geoffrey Nozza, Silvia Valluri, Srinivas Rao Vourvahis, Manoli Rinehart, Alex R. McFadyen, Lynn Fichtenbaum, Carl Clark, Andrew Craig, Charles Fang, Annie F. Heera, Jayvant AIDS Clinical Science OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of maraviroc along with darunavir/ritonavir, all once daily, for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 infected individuals. DESIGN: MODERN was a multicentre, double-blind, noninferiority, phase III study in HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral-naive adults with plasma HIV-1 RNA at least 1000 copies/ml and no evidence of reduced susceptibility to study drugs. METHODS: At screening, participants were randomized 1 : 1 to undergo either genotypic or phenotypic tropism testing. Participants with CCR5-tropic HIV-1 were randomized 1 : 1 to receive maraviroc 150 mg once daily or tenofovir/emtricitabine once daily each with darunavir/ritonavir once daily for 96 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml (Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm) at Week 48. A substudy evaluated bone mineral density, body fat distribution and serum bone turnover markers. RESULTS: Seven hundred and ninety-seven participants were dosed (maraviroc, n = 396; tenofovir/emtricitabine, n = 401). The Data Monitoring Committee recommended early study termination due to inferior efficacy in the maraviroc group. At Week 48, the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml was 77.3% for maraviroc and 86.8% for tenofovir/emtricitabine [difference of −9.54% (95% confidence interval: −14.83 to −4.24)]. More maraviroc participants discontinued for lack of efficacy, which was not associated with non-R5 tropism or resistance. Discontinuations for adverse events, Category C events, Grade 3/4 adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: A once-daily nucleos(t)ide-sparing two-drug regimen of maraviroc and darunavir/ritonavir was inferior to a three-drug regimen of tenofovir/emtricitabine and darunavir/ritonavir in antiretroviral-naive adults. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-05-15 2016-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4856180/ /pubmed/26854810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001058 Text en Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Clinical Science Stellbrink, Hans-Jürgen Le Fevre, Eric Carr, Andrew Saag, Michael S. Mukwaya, Geoffrey Nozza, Silvia Valluri, Srinivas Rao Vourvahis, Manoli Rinehart, Alex R. McFadyen, Lynn Fichtenbaum, Carl Clark, Andrew Craig, Charles Fang, Annie F. Heera, Jayvant Once-daily maraviroc versus tenofovir/emtricitabine each combined with darunavir/ritonavir for initial HIV-1 treatment |
title | Once-daily maraviroc versus tenofovir/emtricitabine each combined with darunavir/ritonavir for initial HIV-1 treatment |
title_full | Once-daily maraviroc versus tenofovir/emtricitabine each combined with darunavir/ritonavir for initial HIV-1 treatment |
title_fullStr | Once-daily maraviroc versus tenofovir/emtricitabine each combined with darunavir/ritonavir for initial HIV-1 treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Once-daily maraviroc versus tenofovir/emtricitabine each combined with darunavir/ritonavir for initial HIV-1 treatment |
title_short | Once-daily maraviroc versus tenofovir/emtricitabine each combined with darunavir/ritonavir for initial HIV-1 treatment |
title_sort | once-daily maraviroc versus tenofovir/emtricitabine each combined with darunavir/ritonavir for initial hiv-1 treatment |
topic | Clinical Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4856180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26854810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001058 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stellbrinkhansjurgen oncedailymaravirocversustenofoviremtricitabineeachcombinedwithdarunavirritonavirforinitialhiv1treatment AT lefevreeric oncedailymaravirocversustenofoviremtricitabineeachcombinedwithdarunavirritonavirforinitialhiv1treatment AT carrandrew oncedailymaravirocversustenofoviremtricitabineeachcombinedwithdarunavirritonavirforinitialhiv1treatment AT saagmichaels oncedailymaravirocversustenofoviremtricitabineeachcombinedwithdarunavirritonavirforinitialhiv1treatment AT mukwayageoffrey oncedailymaravirocversustenofoviremtricitabineeachcombinedwithdarunavirritonavirforinitialhiv1treatment AT nozzasilvia oncedailymaravirocversustenofoviremtricitabineeachcombinedwithdarunavirritonavirforinitialhiv1treatment AT vallurisrinivasrao oncedailymaravirocversustenofoviremtricitabineeachcombinedwithdarunavirritonavirforinitialhiv1treatment AT vourvahismanoli oncedailymaravirocversustenofoviremtricitabineeachcombinedwithdarunavirritonavirforinitialhiv1treatment AT rinehartalexr oncedailymaravirocversustenofoviremtricitabineeachcombinedwithdarunavirritonavirforinitialhiv1treatment AT mcfadyenlynn oncedailymaravirocversustenofoviremtricitabineeachcombinedwithdarunavirritonavirforinitialhiv1treatment AT fichtenbaumcarl oncedailymaravirocversustenofoviremtricitabineeachcombinedwithdarunavirritonavirforinitialhiv1treatment AT clarkandrew oncedailymaravirocversustenofoviremtricitabineeachcombinedwithdarunavirritonavirforinitialhiv1treatment AT craigcharles oncedailymaravirocversustenofoviremtricitabineeachcombinedwithdarunavirritonavirforinitialhiv1treatment AT fangannief oncedailymaravirocversustenofoviremtricitabineeachcombinedwithdarunavirritonavirforinitialhiv1treatment AT heerajayvant oncedailymaravirocversustenofoviremtricitabineeachcombinedwithdarunavirritonavirforinitialhiv1treatment |