Cargando…

The Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Impairment on Asynchronous Glimpsing of Speech

In a previous study with normal-hearing listeners, we evaluated consonant identification masked by two or more spectrally contiguous bands of noise, with asynchronous square-wave modulation applied to neighboring bands. Speech recognition thresholds were 5.1–8.5 dB better when neighboring bands were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ozmeral, Erol J., Buss, Emily, Hall, Joseph W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4856319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27144601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154920
_version_ 1782430486192193536
author Ozmeral, Erol J.
Buss, Emily
Hall, Joseph W.
author_facet Ozmeral, Erol J.
Buss, Emily
Hall, Joseph W.
author_sort Ozmeral, Erol J.
collection PubMed
description In a previous study with normal-hearing listeners, we evaluated consonant identification masked by two or more spectrally contiguous bands of noise, with asynchronous square-wave modulation applied to neighboring bands. Speech recognition thresholds were 5.1–8.5 dB better when neighboring bands were presented to different ears (dichotic) than when all bands were presented to one ear (monaural), depending on the spectral width of the frequency bands. This dichotic advantage was interpreted as reflecting masking release from peripheral spread of masking from neighboring frequency bands. The present study evaluated this effect in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss, a population more susceptible to spread of masking. Speech perception (vowel-consonant-vowel stimuli, as in /aBa/) was measured in the presence of fluctuating noise that was either modulated synchronously across frequency or asynchronously. Hearing-impaired listeners (n = 9) and normal-hearing controls were tested at either the same intensity (n = 7) or same sensation level (n = 8). Hearing-impaired listeners had mild-to-moderate hearing loss and symmetrical, flat audiometric thresholds. While all groups of listeners performed better in the dichotic than monaural condition, this effect was smaller for the hearing-impaired (3.5 dB) and equivalent-sensation-level controls (3.3 dB) than controls tested at the same intensity (11.0 dB). The present study is consistent with the idea that dichotic presentation can improve speech-in-noise listening for hearing-impaired listeners, and may be enhanced when combined with amplification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4856319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48563192016-05-07 The Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Impairment on Asynchronous Glimpsing of Speech Ozmeral, Erol J. Buss, Emily Hall, Joseph W. PLoS One Research Article In a previous study with normal-hearing listeners, we evaluated consonant identification masked by two or more spectrally contiguous bands of noise, with asynchronous square-wave modulation applied to neighboring bands. Speech recognition thresholds were 5.1–8.5 dB better when neighboring bands were presented to different ears (dichotic) than when all bands were presented to one ear (monaural), depending on the spectral width of the frequency bands. This dichotic advantage was interpreted as reflecting masking release from peripheral spread of masking from neighboring frequency bands. The present study evaluated this effect in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss, a population more susceptible to spread of masking. Speech perception (vowel-consonant-vowel stimuli, as in /aBa/) was measured in the presence of fluctuating noise that was either modulated synchronously across frequency or asynchronously. Hearing-impaired listeners (n = 9) and normal-hearing controls were tested at either the same intensity (n = 7) or same sensation level (n = 8). Hearing-impaired listeners had mild-to-moderate hearing loss and symmetrical, flat audiometric thresholds. While all groups of listeners performed better in the dichotic than monaural condition, this effect was smaller for the hearing-impaired (3.5 dB) and equivalent-sensation-level controls (3.3 dB) than controls tested at the same intensity (11.0 dB). The present study is consistent with the idea that dichotic presentation can improve speech-in-noise listening for hearing-impaired listeners, and may be enhanced when combined with amplification. Public Library of Science 2016-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4856319/ /pubmed/27144601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154920 Text en © 2016 Ozmeral et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ozmeral, Erol J.
Buss, Emily
Hall, Joseph W.
The Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Impairment on Asynchronous Glimpsing of Speech
title The Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Impairment on Asynchronous Glimpsing of Speech
title_full The Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Impairment on Asynchronous Glimpsing of Speech
title_fullStr The Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Impairment on Asynchronous Glimpsing of Speech
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Impairment on Asynchronous Glimpsing of Speech
title_short The Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Impairment on Asynchronous Glimpsing of Speech
title_sort effects of sensorineural hearing impairment on asynchronous glimpsing of speech
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4856319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27144601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154920
work_keys_str_mv AT ozmeralerolj theeffectsofsensorineuralhearingimpairmentonasynchronousglimpsingofspeech
AT bussemily theeffectsofsensorineuralhearingimpairmentonasynchronousglimpsingofspeech
AT halljosephw theeffectsofsensorineuralhearingimpairmentonasynchronousglimpsingofspeech
AT ozmeralerolj effectsofsensorineuralhearingimpairmentonasynchronousglimpsingofspeech
AT bussemily effectsofsensorineuralhearingimpairmentonasynchronousglimpsingofspeech
AT halljosephw effectsofsensorineuralhearingimpairmentonasynchronousglimpsingofspeech