Cargando…

Antibiotic-treated versus germ-free rodents for microbiota transplantation studies

We recently investigated the applicability of antibiotic-treated recipient mice for transfer of different gut microbiota profiles. With this addendum we elaborate on perspectives and limitations of using antibiotics as an alternative to germ-free (GF) technology in microbial transplantation studies,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lundberg, Randi, Toft, Martin F., August, Benjamin, Hansen, Axel K., Hansen, Camilla H. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4856451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26744774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2015.1127463
_version_ 1782430511227994112
author Lundberg, Randi
Toft, Martin F.
August, Benjamin
Hansen, Axel K.
Hansen, Camilla H. F.
author_facet Lundberg, Randi
Toft, Martin F.
August, Benjamin
Hansen, Axel K.
Hansen, Camilla H. F.
author_sort Lundberg, Randi
collection PubMed
description We recently investigated the applicability of antibiotic-treated recipient mice for transfer of different gut microbiota profiles. With this addendum we elaborate on perspectives and limitations of using antibiotics as an alternative to germ-free (GF) technology in microbial transplantation studies, and we speculate on the housing effect. It is possible to transfer host phenotypes via fecal transplantation to antibiotic-treated animals, but problems with reproducibility, baseline values, and antibiotic resistance genes should be considered. GF animals maintained in isolators still seem to be the best controlled models for long-term microbial transplantation, but antibiotic-treated recipients are also commonly utilized. We identify a need for systematic experiments investigating the stability of microbial transplantations by addressing 1) the recipient status as either GF, antibiotic-treated or specific pathogen free and 2) different levels of protected housing systems. In addition, the developmental effect of microbes on host physiological functions should be evaluated in the different scenarios.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4856451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48564512016-05-17 Antibiotic-treated versus germ-free rodents for microbiota transplantation studies Lundberg, Randi Toft, Martin F. August, Benjamin Hansen, Axel K. Hansen, Camilla H. F. Gut Microbes Addenda We recently investigated the applicability of antibiotic-treated recipient mice for transfer of different gut microbiota profiles. With this addendum we elaborate on perspectives and limitations of using antibiotics as an alternative to germ-free (GF) technology in microbial transplantation studies, and we speculate on the housing effect. It is possible to transfer host phenotypes via fecal transplantation to antibiotic-treated animals, but problems with reproducibility, baseline values, and antibiotic resistance genes should be considered. GF animals maintained in isolators still seem to be the best controlled models for long-term microbial transplantation, but antibiotic-treated recipients are also commonly utilized. We identify a need for systematic experiments investigating the stability of microbial transplantations by addressing 1) the recipient status as either GF, antibiotic-treated or specific pathogen free and 2) different levels of protected housing systems. In addition, the developmental effect of microbes on host physiological functions should be evaluated in the different scenarios. Taylor & Francis 2016-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4856451/ /pubmed/26744774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2015.1127463 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.
spellingShingle Addenda
Lundberg, Randi
Toft, Martin F.
August, Benjamin
Hansen, Axel K.
Hansen, Camilla H. F.
Antibiotic-treated versus germ-free rodents for microbiota transplantation studies
title Antibiotic-treated versus germ-free rodents for microbiota transplantation studies
title_full Antibiotic-treated versus germ-free rodents for microbiota transplantation studies
title_fullStr Antibiotic-treated versus germ-free rodents for microbiota transplantation studies
title_full_unstemmed Antibiotic-treated versus germ-free rodents for microbiota transplantation studies
title_short Antibiotic-treated versus germ-free rodents for microbiota transplantation studies
title_sort antibiotic-treated versus germ-free rodents for microbiota transplantation studies
topic Addenda
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4856451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26744774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2015.1127463
work_keys_str_mv AT lundbergrandi antibiotictreatedversusgermfreerodentsformicrobiotatransplantationstudies
AT toftmartinf antibiotictreatedversusgermfreerodentsformicrobiotatransplantationstudies
AT augustbenjamin antibiotictreatedversusgermfreerodentsformicrobiotatransplantationstudies
AT hansenaxelk antibiotictreatedversusgermfreerodentsformicrobiotatransplantationstudies
AT hansencamillahf antibiotictreatedversusgermfreerodentsformicrobiotatransplantationstudies