Cargando…
Antibiotic-treated versus germ-free rodents for microbiota transplantation studies
We recently investigated the applicability of antibiotic-treated recipient mice for transfer of different gut microbiota profiles. With this addendum we elaborate on perspectives and limitations of using antibiotics as an alternative to germ-free (GF) technology in microbial transplantation studies,...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4856451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26744774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2015.1127463 |
_version_ | 1782430511227994112 |
---|---|
author | Lundberg, Randi Toft, Martin F. August, Benjamin Hansen, Axel K. Hansen, Camilla H. F. |
author_facet | Lundberg, Randi Toft, Martin F. August, Benjamin Hansen, Axel K. Hansen, Camilla H. F. |
author_sort | Lundberg, Randi |
collection | PubMed |
description | We recently investigated the applicability of antibiotic-treated recipient mice for transfer of different gut microbiota profiles. With this addendum we elaborate on perspectives and limitations of using antibiotics as an alternative to germ-free (GF) technology in microbial transplantation studies, and we speculate on the housing effect. It is possible to transfer host phenotypes via fecal transplantation to antibiotic-treated animals, but problems with reproducibility, baseline values, and antibiotic resistance genes should be considered. GF animals maintained in isolators still seem to be the best controlled models for long-term microbial transplantation, but antibiotic-treated recipients are also commonly utilized. We identify a need for systematic experiments investigating the stability of microbial transplantations by addressing 1) the recipient status as either GF, antibiotic-treated or specific pathogen free and 2) different levels of protected housing systems. In addition, the developmental effect of microbes on host physiological functions should be evaluated in the different scenarios. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4856451 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48564512016-05-17 Antibiotic-treated versus germ-free rodents for microbiota transplantation studies Lundberg, Randi Toft, Martin F. August, Benjamin Hansen, Axel K. Hansen, Camilla H. F. Gut Microbes Addenda We recently investigated the applicability of antibiotic-treated recipient mice for transfer of different gut microbiota profiles. With this addendum we elaborate on perspectives and limitations of using antibiotics as an alternative to germ-free (GF) technology in microbial transplantation studies, and we speculate on the housing effect. It is possible to transfer host phenotypes via fecal transplantation to antibiotic-treated animals, but problems with reproducibility, baseline values, and antibiotic resistance genes should be considered. GF animals maintained in isolators still seem to be the best controlled models for long-term microbial transplantation, but antibiotic-treated recipients are also commonly utilized. We identify a need for systematic experiments investigating the stability of microbial transplantations by addressing 1) the recipient status as either GF, antibiotic-treated or specific pathogen free and 2) different levels of protected housing systems. In addition, the developmental effect of microbes on host physiological functions should be evaluated in the different scenarios. Taylor & Francis 2016-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4856451/ /pubmed/26744774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2015.1127463 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted. |
spellingShingle | Addenda Lundberg, Randi Toft, Martin F. August, Benjamin Hansen, Axel K. Hansen, Camilla H. F. Antibiotic-treated versus germ-free rodents for microbiota transplantation studies |
title | Antibiotic-treated versus germ-free rodents for microbiota transplantation studies |
title_full | Antibiotic-treated versus germ-free rodents for microbiota transplantation studies |
title_fullStr | Antibiotic-treated versus germ-free rodents for microbiota transplantation studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Antibiotic-treated versus germ-free rodents for microbiota transplantation studies |
title_short | Antibiotic-treated versus germ-free rodents for microbiota transplantation studies |
title_sort | antibiotic-treated versus germ-free rodents for microbiota transplantation studies |
topic | Addenda |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4856451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26744774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2015.1127463 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lundbergrandi antibiotictreatedversusgermfreerodentsformicrobiotatransplantationstudies AT toftmartinf antibiotictreatedversusgermfreerodentsformicrobiotatransplantationstudies AT augustbenjamin antibiotictreatedversusgermfreerodentsformicrobiotatransplantationstudies AT hansenaxelk antibiotictreatedversusgermfreerodentsformicrobiotatransplantationstudies AT hansencamillahf antibiotictreatedversusgermfreerodentsformicrobiotatransplantationstudies |