Cargando…
Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
PURPOSE: Glenoid component malposition is associated with poor function and early failure of both anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Glenoid positioning is challenging particularly in the setting of bone loss or deformity. Recently, the use of computer assistance has been shown to red...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4857532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27186057 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.180717 |
_version_ | 1782430668392759296 |
---|---|
author | Dallalana, Richard James McMahon, Ryan A. East, Ben Geraghty, Liam |
author_facet | Dallalana, Richard James McMahon, Ryan A. East, Ben Geraghty, Liam |
author_sort | Dallalana, Richard James |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Glenoid component malposition is associated with poor function and early failure of both anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Glenoid positioning is challenging particularly in the setting of bone loss or deformity. Recently, the use of computer assistance has been shown to reduce implantation error. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in cases of anatomic and reverse shoulder replacement in vivo. METHODS: Twenty patients underwent total shoulder arthroplasty using a computed tomography (CT)-based patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) system, ten anatomic and ten reverse. Preoperative three-dimensional digital templating of glenoid component position was undertaken and surgery then performed using a custom-made guide. Postoperative CT scans were used to compare final implanted component position to the preoperatively planned position in the same patient. RESULTS: Final component position and orientation closely reflected the preoperatively templated position. Mean deviation in the glenoid version from planned was 1.8° ±1.9° (range, 0.1°–7.3°). Mean deviation in inclination was 1.3° ±1.0° (range, 0.2°–4.5°). Mean deviation in position on the glenoid face was 0.5 ± 0.3 mm (range, 0.0–1.3 mm) in the anteroposterior plane and 0.8 ± 0.5 mm (range, 0.0–1.9 mm) in the superoinferior plane. Actual achieved version was within 7° of neutral in all cases except for one where it was deliberately planned to be outside of this range. CONCLUSION: PSI in both anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty is highly accurate in guiding glenoid component implantation in vivo. The system can reliably correct bony deformity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4857532 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48575322016-05-16 Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty Dallalana, Richard James McMahon, Ryan A. East, Ben Geraghty, Liam Int J Shoulder Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Glenoid component malposition is associated with poor function and early failure of both anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Glenoid positioning is challenging particularly in the setting of bone loss or deformity. Recently, the use of computer assistance has been shown to reduce implantation error. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in cases of anatomic and reverse shoulder replacement in vivo. METHODS: Twenty patients underwent total shoulder arthroplasty using a computed tomography (CT)-based patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) system, ten anatomic and ten reverse. Preoperative three-dimensional digital templating of glenoid component position was undertaken and surgery then performed using a custom-made guide. Postoperative CT scans were used to compare final implanted component position to the preoperatively planned position in the same patient. RESULTS: Final component position and orientation closely reflected the preoperatively templated position. Mean deviation in the glenoid version from planned was 1.8° ±1.9° (range, 0.1°–7.3°). Mean deviation in inclination was 1.3° ±1.0° (range, 0.2°–4.5°). Mean deviation in position on the glenoid face was 0.5 ± 0.3 mm (range, 0.0–1.3 mm) in the anteroposterior plane and 0.8 ± 0.5 mm (range, 0.0–1.9 mm) in the superoinferior plane. Actual achieved version was within 7° of neutral in all cases except for one where it was deliberately planned to be outside of this range. CONCLUSION: PSI in both anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty is highly accurate in guiding glenoid component implantation in vivo. The system can reliably correct bony deformity. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4857532/ /pubmed/27186057 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.180717 Text en Copyright: © 2016 International Journal of Shoulder Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dallalana, Richard James McMahon, Ryan A. East, Ben Geraghty, Liam Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty |
title | Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty |
title_full | Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty |
title_short | Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty |
title_sort | accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4857532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27186057 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.180717 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dallalanarichardjames accuracyofpatientspecificinstrumentationinanatomicandreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty AT mcmahonryana accuracyofpatientspecificinstrumentationinanatomicandreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty AT eastben accuracyofpatientspecificinstrumentationinanatomicandreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty AT geraghtyliam accuracyofpatientspecificinstrumentationinanatomicandreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty |