Cargando…

A randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of a combination of formoterol and ciclesonide with ciclesonide alone in asthma subjects with moderate-to-severe airflow limitation

CONTEXT: The combination of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) is widely used in the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma uncontrolled by ICS alone. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new ICS-LABA combination inhaler containing Formoterol (F) and Cicleso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salvi, Sundeep S, Vaidya, Abhijit J, Kodgule, Rahul R, Gogtay, Jaideep A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4857562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27185990
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-2113.180803
_version_ 1782430671127445504
author Salvi, Sundeep S
Vaidya, Abhijit J
Kodgule, Rahul R
Gogtay, Jaideep A
author_facet Salvi, Sundeep S
Vaidya, Abhijit J
Kodgule, Rahul R
Gogtay, Jaideep A
author_sort Salvi, Sundeep S
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: The combination of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) is widely used in the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma uncontrolled by ICS alone. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new ICS-LABA combination inhaler containing Formoterol (F) and Ciclesonide (C). SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group fashion, multi-centric study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 169 asthma patients received Ciclesonide 80 μg once daily during a 4-week run-in period, after which, they were randomized to receive either C (80 μg) or a combination of F (4.5 μg) and C (80 μg) (FC) both delivered through a hydro-fluro-alkane pressurized-metered-dose inhaler as 1 puff twice daily, for 6 weeks. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Inter-group differences were compared using t-test for independent samples at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: From baseline, the improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 s at 1, 3, and 6 weeks was significantly higher in the FC group compared to Group C (110 ml vs. 40 ml, 140 ml vs. 20 ml, and 110 ml vs. 40 ml, respectively, all P < 0.05). From baseline, the improvements in mean morning peak expiratory flow at 1, 3, and 6 weeks was significantly higher in the FC group compared to Group C (17 L/min vs.−3 L/min, 22 L/min vs. 3 L/min, and 30 ml vs. 8 L/min respectively, all P < 0.05). The changes in symptom scores were similar in both the groups. The adverse events in the FC group were not significantly different from those in the C group. CONCLUSIONS: FC provides better improvement than C alone in terms of lung function and symptoms without increased risk of adverse events in asthma patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4857562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48575622016-05-16 A randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of a combination of formoterol and ciclesonide with ciclesonide alone in asthma subjects with moderate-to-severe airflow limitation Salvi, Sundeep S Vaidya, Abhijit J Kodgule, Rahul R Gogtay, Jaideep A Lung India Original Article CONTEXT: The combination of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) is widely used in the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma uncontrolled by ICS alone. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new ICS-LABA combination inhaler containing Formoterol (F) and Ciclesonide (C). SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group fashion, multi-centric study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 169 asthma patients received Ciclesonide 80 μg once daily during a 4-week run-in period, after which, they were randomized to receive either C (80 μg) or a combination of F (4.5 μg) and C (80 μg) (FC) both delivered through a hydro-fluro-alkane pressurized-metered-dose inhaler as 1 puff twice daily, for 6 weeks. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Inter-group differences were compared using t-test for independent samples at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: From baseline, the improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 s at 1, 3, and 6 weeks was significantly higher in the FC group compared to Group C (110 ml vs. 40 ml, 140 ml vs. 20 ml, and 110 ml vs. 40 ml, respectively, all P < 0.05). From baseline, the improvements in mean morning peak expiratory flow at 1, 3, and 6 weeks was significantly higher in the FC group compared to Group C (17 L/min vs.−3 L/min, 22 L/min vs. 3 L/min, and 30 ml vs. 8 L/min respectively, all P < 0.05). The changes in symptom scores were similar in both the groups. The adverse events in the FC group were not significantly different from those in the C group. CONCLUSIONS: FC provides better improvement than C alone in terms of lung function and symptoms without increased risk of adverse events in asthma patients. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4857562/ /pubmed/27185990 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-2113.180803 Text en Copyright: © Lung India http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Salvi, Sundeep S
Vaidya, Abhijit J
Kodgule, Rahul R
Gogtay, Jaideep A
A randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of a combination of formoterol and ciclesonide with ciclesonide alone in asthma subjects with moderate-to-severe airflow limitation
title A randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of a combination of formoterol and ciclesonide with ciclesonide alone in asthma subjects with moderate-to-severe airflow limitation
title_full A randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of a combination of formoterol and ciclesonide with ciclesonide alone in asthma subjects with moderate-to-severe airflow limitation
title_fullStr A randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of a combination of formoterol and ciclesonide with ciclesonide alone in asthma subjects with moderate-to-severe airflow limitation
title_full_unstemmed A randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of a combination of formoterol and ciclesonide with ciclesonide alone in asthma subjects with moderate-to-severe airflow limitation
title_short A randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of a combination of formoterol and ciclesonide with ciclesonide alone in asthma subjects with moderate-to-severe airflow limitation
title_sort randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of a combination of formoterol and ciclesonide with ciclesonide alone in asthma subjects with moderate-to-severe airflow limitation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4857562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27185990
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-2113.180803
work_keys_str_mv AT salvisundeeps arandomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofacombinationofformoterolandciclesonidewithciclesonidealoneinasthmasubjectswithmoderatetosevereairflowlimitation
AT vaidyaabhijitj arandomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofacombinationofformoterolandciclesonidewithciclesonidealoneinasthmasubjectswithmoderatetosevereairflowlimitation
AT kodgulerahulr arandomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofacombinationofformoterolandciclesonidewithciclesonidealoneinasthmasubjectswithmoderatetosevereairflowlimitation
AT gogtayjaideepa arandomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofacombinationofformoterolandciclesonidewithciclesonidealoneinasthmasubjectswithmoderatetosevereairflowlimitation
AT salvisundeeps randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofacombinationofformoterolandciclesonidewithciclesonidealoneinasthmasubjectswithmoderatetosevereairflowlimitation
AT vaidyaabhijitj randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofacombinationofformoterolandciclesonidewithciclesonidealoneinasthmasubjectswithmoderatetosevereairflowlimitation
AT kodgulerahulr randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofacombinationofformoterolandciclesonidewithciclesonidealoneinasthmasubjectswithmoderatetosevereairflowlimitation
AT gogtayjaideepa randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofacombinationofformoterolandciclesonidewithciclesonidealoneinasthmasubjectswithmoderatetosevereairflowlimitation