Cargando…

Cardiac Troponin I as Compared to Troponin T for the Detection of Myocardial Damage in Horses

BACKGROUND: Different cardiac troponin I (cTnI) assays give different results. Only 1 manufacturer has marketed troponin T (cTnT) assays. Therefore, cTnT often is preferred for detection of myocardial infarction in human patients. Studies of cTnT in horses are limited. OBJECTIVES: To compare a cTnI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Der Vekens, N., Decloedt, A., Ven, S., De Clercq, D., van Loon, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4858065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25619522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.12530
_version_ 1782430744180686848
author Van Der Vekens, N.
Decloedt, A.
Ven, S.
De Clercq, D.
van Loon, G.
author_facet Van Der Vekens, N.
Decloedt, A.
Ven, S.
De Clercq, D.
van Loon, G.
author_sort Van Der Vekens, N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Different cardiac troponin I (cTnI) assays give different results. Only 1 manufacturer has marketed troponin T (cTnT) assays. Therefore, cTnT often is preferred for detection of myocardial infarction in human patients. Studies of cTnT in horses are limited. OBJECTIVES: To compare a cTnI and a high‐sensitive cTnT assay (hs‐cTnT) in horses. ANIMALS: Cardiac troponin I and cTnT were determined in 35 healthy horses (group 1), 23 horses suspected to have primary myocardial damage (group 2a), and 41 horses with secondary myocardial damage caused by structural heart disease (group 2b). METHODS: All cTnI samples were analyzed at laboratory A (limit of detection [LOD]: 0.03 ng/mL), whereas cTnT samples were analyzed at 2 laboratories with the same hs‐cTnT assay (laboratory B, LOD: 10.0 pg/mL; laboratory C, LOD: 4.0 pg/mL). RESULTS: The median cTnI concentration in group 2a (0.90 ng/mL; range, 0.03–58.27 ng/mL) was significantly higher (P < .001) than in group 1 (0.03 ng/mL; range, 0.03–0.09 ng/mL) or group 2b (0.05 ng/mL; range, 0.03–30.92 ng/mL), and the optimal cut‐off for detection of primary myocardial damage was 0.095 ng/mL (sensitivity: 90.5%, specificity: 100%). Using an LOD of 10.0 pg/mL for all cTnT samples, a cut‐off value of 10.5 pg/mL was found, but sensitivity was low (42.9%). When only samples analyzed at laboratory C (n = 58) were included, a cut‐off of 6.6 pg/mL was found (sensitivity: 81%, specificity: 100%). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Despite large quantitative differences, cTnI and cTnT are both useful for detection of myocardial damage in horses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4858065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48580652016-06-22 Cardiac Troponin I as Compared to Troponin T for the Detection of Myocardial Damage in Horses Van Der Vekens, N. Decloedt, A. Ven, S. De Clercq, D. van Loon, G. J Vet Intern Med Standard Articles BACKGROUND: Different cardiac troponin I (cTnI) assays give different results. Only 1 manufacturer has marketed troponin T (cTnT) assays. Therefore, cTnT often is preferred for detection of myocardial infarction in human patients. Studies of cTnT in horses are limited. OBJECTIVES: To compare a cTnI and a high‐sensitive cTnT assay (hs‐cTnT) in horses. ANIMALS: Cardiac troponin I and cTnT were determined in 35 healthy horses (group 1), 23 horses suspected to have primary myocardial damage (group 2a), and 41 horses with secondary myocardial damage caused by structural heart disease (group 2b). METHODS: All cTnI samples were analyzed at laboratory A (limit of detection [LOD]: 0.03 ng/mL), whereas cTnT samples were analyzed at 2 laboratories with the same hs‐cTnT assay (laboratory B, LOD: 10.0 pg/mL; laboratory C, LOD: 4.0 pg/mL). RESULTS: The median cTnI concentration in group 2a (0.90 ng/mL; range, 0.03–58.27 ng/mL) was significantly higher (P < .001) than in group 1 (0.03 ng/mL; range, 0.03–0.09 ng/mL) or group 2b (0.05 ng/mL; range, 0.03–30.92 ng/mL), and the optimal cut‐off for detection of primary myocardial damage was 0.095 ng/mL (sensitivity: 90.5%, specificity: 100%). Using an LOD of 10.0 pg/mL for all cTnT samples, a cut‐off value of 10.5 pg/mL was found, but sensitivity was low (42.9%). When only samples analyzed at laboratory C (n = 58) were included, a cut‐off of 6.6 pg/mL was found (sensitivity: 81%, specificity: 100%). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Despite large quantitative differences, cTnI and cTnT are both useful for detection of myocardial damage in horses. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-01-25 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4858065/ /pubmed/25619522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.12530 Text en Copyright © 2015 by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine
spellingShingle Standard Articles
Van Der Vekens, N.
Decloedt, A.
Ven, S.
De Clercq, D.
van Loon, G.
Cardiac Troponin I as Compared to Troponin T for the Detection of Myocardial Damage in Horses
title Cardiac Troponin I as Compared to Troponin T for the Detection of Myocardial Damage in Horses
title_full Cardiac Troponin I as Compared to Troponin T for the Detection of Myocardial Damage in Horses
title_fullStr Cardiac Troponin I as Compared to Troponin T for the Detection of Myocardial Damage in Horses
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac Troponin I as Compared to Troponin T for the Detection of Myocardial Damage in Horses
title_short Cardiac Troponin I as Compared to Troponin T for the Detection of Myocardial Damage in Horses
title_sort cardiac troponin i as compared to troponin t for the detection of myocardial damage in horses
topic Standard Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4858065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25619522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.12530
work_keys_str_mv AT vandervekensn cardiactroponiniascomparedtotroponintforthedetectionofmyocardialdamageinhorses
AT decloedta cardiactroponiniascomparedtotroponintforthedetectionofmyocardialdamageinhorses
AT vens cardiactroponiniascomparedtotroponintforthedetectionofmyocardialdamageinhorses
AT declercqd cardiactroponiniascomparedtotroponintforthedetectionofmyocardialdamageinhorses
AT vanloong cardiactroponiniascomparedtotroponintforthedetectionofmyocardialdamageinhorses